Snakes, “land snails” and Hesiod: Commentary on Nic. Ther. 153
EDN: MJGMNT
Abstract
The article offers a comprehensive interpretation of verse 153 of Nicander of Colophon’s didactic poem Theriaca, in which the seps — one of the varieties of poisonous snakes — is compared to a snail. The passage is analyzed both in the context of the passage about the seps (145–156) and in relation to the literary tradition of Greek didactic epic poetry. Analysis of this comparison shows the inconsistency of its generally accepted interpretation, based on the fact that the snake and the snail are similar in color. On the contrary, the author of the article suggests that the passage in question in Nicander’s Theriaca is more likely to be influenced by a different kind of external resemblance rather than color — for example, the texture of the skin of both animals or the coiled shape of the snail’s shell and of the body of the snake. Furthermore, the author reveals the Hesiodic subtext in the comparison of the snake to the snail, and points out that Nicander creates it by means of a reference to Hesiod’s ‘Works and Days’. This reference is based on the descriptive designation of the snail, which in its manner is strongly reminiscent of the so-called ‘kennings’ in Hesiod’s didactic poem.
About the Author
A. M. MalomudRussian Federation
Anna Mikhailovna Malomud, PhD Senior Lecturer, Department of General History, Faculty of History and Philology, Institute for Social Sciences; Research Fellow, Laboratory for Commentary on Ancient Texts
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
121069, Moscow, Povarskaya Str., 25a, Bld. 1
References
1. Ercolani, А. (Intro., Trans., & Comment.) (2010). Esiodo. Opere e giorni. Carocci.
2. Gow, A. S. F., & Scholfield, A. F. (Ed., Trans., & Notes) (1953). Nicander. The poems and poetical fragments. [Cambridge] Univ. Press.
3. Jacques, J.-M. (Ed., & Trans.) (2002). Nicandre. Œuvres, Vol. 2: Les thériaques. Fragments iologiques antérieurs à Nicandre. Les Belles Lettres.
4. Magnelli, E. (2006). Nicander’s chronology: A literary approach. In M. A. Harder, R. F. Regtuit, & G. C. Wakker (Eds.). Beyond the canon (pp. 185–204). Peeters.
5. Malomud, A. М. (2024). Hellenistic poets on the origin of the Nile: A poetic commentary on a geographical problem. Shagi /Steps, 10(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-154-162.
6. Malomud, A. M. (2025). “Neumolimyi iad”: Nikandr Kolofonskii i Anita iz Tegei [“Relentless venom”: Nicander of Colophon and Anyte of Tegea]. Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia, 29(2), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp2306901529071. (In Russian).
7. Overduin, F. (2015). Nicander of Colophon’s Theriaca: A literary commentary. Brill.
8. Overduin, F. (2019). In the realm of the two-headed snake: Pragmatics and aesthetics of mirabilia in Nicander’s Theriaca and Alexipharmaca. In G. Kazantzidis (Ed.). Medicine and paradoxography in the ancient world (pp. 73–94). De Gruyter.
9. Spatafora, G. (Intro., Trans., & Comment.) (2007). Nicandro. Theriaká e Alexiphármaka. Carocci.
10. Waern, I. (1951). ΓΗΣ ΟΣΤΕΑ: The kenning in pre-Christian Greek poetry. Almqvist & Wiksell.
11. Wilson, K. D. (2015). Signs in the song: Scientific poetry in the Hellenistic period (Diss., University of Pennsylvania).
Review
For citations:
Malomud A.M. Snakes, “land snails” and Hesiod: Commentary on Nic. Ther. 153. Shagi / Steps. 2026;12(1):173-180. (In Russ.) EDN: MJGMNT
JATS XML




































