Recalling or constructing the past? The image of the Egyptian “world empire” in the Classical and the Byzantine traditions

The Сlassical motif of the great Egyptian king-conqueror who ruled in the remote past was usually analyzed regarding the alleged scale of his conquests (e. g. the outcome of his assault on Scythia) but the presentation of their purpose and the organization of his possessions remained untouched. The earliest account of the king Sesostris by Herodotus (II.102–110) tells virtually nothing about that. Pompeius Trogus, deriving his evidence from some earlier source, made a telling remark that the Egyptian king Vesosis and his Scythian counterpart Tanaus sought not power (imperium) for themselves but rather glory for their peoples, unlike the Assyrian king Ninus, who craved territorial dominion and made the conquered lands his permanent possession (Iust. I.1.7). Diodorus Siculus, probably reproducing the work on Egypt by Hecataeus of Abdera (late 4th century BC), ascribed to the Egyptian conqueror Sesoosis a rather mild treatment of subdued peoples, levying on them regular tribute and using the labour of prisoners of war (Diod. I.55.10–12, 56.2). At the same time Diodorus tells a story of the king’s habit to place the subdued rulers four-in-hand under the yoke in his chariot (Ibid. 58.1–2); this motif obviously extrapolates the Assyrian practice onto reminiscences of Egypt’s past and is eventually known in Roman and Byzantine tradition. In addition, Roman authors compare the Egyptian empire of the past with the contemporary Roman and Parthian empires (Tac. Ann. II.60.3; cf. Strabo XVII.1.46). It seems that the earlier tradition preserved real memories of Egyptian possessions of the 2nd millennium BC as a sphere of influence distinct from the centralized empires of the 1st millennium BC, but in Roman times they were likened to such states.

1. Ball, J. (1939). Contributions to the geography of Egypt. Government Press; Bulaq.

2. Berlev, O. D. (1978). Drevneishee opisanie sotsial’noi organizatsii Egipta [The most ancient description of the ancient Egyptian social organization]. In M. A. Dandamaev (Ed.). Problemy sotsial’nykh otnoshenii i form zavisimosti na drevnem Vostoke (pp. 26–34). Nauka — Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury. (In Russian).

3. Bongard-Levin, G. M. (Ed.). (1988). Istoriia drevnego Vostoka: Zarozhdenie drevneishikh klassovykh obshchestv i pervye ochagi rabovladel’cheskoi tsivilizatsii [The history of ancient Orient: Genesis of the earliest stratified societies and the first centers of the slave-owning civilization], Pt. 2: Peredniaia Aziia. Egipet [Near East. Egypt]. Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury izdatel’stva “Nauka”. (In Russian).

4. Broze, M. (1989). La princesse de Bakhtan: Essai d’analyse stylistique. Fondation égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.

5. Forichon, S. (2018 / 2019). Sesostris’ chariot in a Roman circus? A new interpretation of a scene depicted on an imperial oil lamp. The Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 63 / 64, 237–252.

6. Grajetski, W. (2006). The Middle Kingdom of ancient Egypt: History, archaeology and society. Duckworth.

7. Hagendahl, H. (1941). Orosius und Justinus. Ein Beitrag zur iustinischen Textgeschichte. Wettergren & Kerber.

8. Hasel, G. F. (1979). The four world empires of Daniel 2 against its Near Eastern environment. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 12, 17–30.

9. Ivanchik, A. I. (2005). Nakanune kolonizatsii: Severnoe Prichernomor’e i stepnye kochevniki VIII–VII vv. do n. e. v antichnoi literaturnoi traditsii: fol’klor, literatura i istoriia [On the eve of colonization: The North Black Sea area and steppe nomads in the 8th–7th centuries B. C. in Сlassical narratives: Folklore, fiction and history]. Paleograf. (In Russian).

10. Ladynin, I. A. (2005). Antichnyi topos “vladychestva nad Aziei” i kontseptsiia nepreryvnoi nadregional’noi gosudarstvennosti na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke v I tys. do n. e. [The classical topos of ‘the kingship of Asia’ and the concept of continuous multiregional monarchy in the Near and Middle East, first millennium B. C.]. In M. M. Dandamaeva et al. (Eds.). Edubba vechna i postoianna: Materialy konferentsii, posviashchennoi 90-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia Igoria Mikhailovicha D’iakonova (pp. 151–160). Izdatel’stvo Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha. (In Russian).

11. Ladynin, I. A. (2011). The Near Eastern empires of the First Millennium B. C. in terms of Ancient Egyptian texts: The Name Stt / Stt. Scripta antiqua. Voprosy drevnei istorii, filologii, iskusstva i material’noi kul’tury, 1, 128–153.

12. Ladynin, I. A. (2017). “Snova pravit Egipet!” Nachalo ellinisticheskogo vremeni v kontseptsiiakh i konstruktakh pozdneegipetskikh istoriografii i propagandy [“Egypt rules again!” The start of Hellenistic time in the concepts and constructs of late Egyptian historiography and propaganda]. Izdatel’stvo RKhGA. (In Russian).

13. Ladynin, I. A. (2019). Eshche raz o letoschislenii ot Menofrisa (K istorii nauchnoi problemy i poisku ee resheniia) [Once again on the time-reckoning “after Menophris” (A history of a scholarly problem and a search of its solution)]. Vestnik drevnei istorii, 79(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032103910005032-8. (In Russian).

14. Ladynin, I. A. (2021). Ot Meotidy do Nila: voina egiptian so skifami v traditsiiakh Gekateia Abderskogo i Pompeia Troga [From Maeotis to the Nile: The war between Egyptians and Scythians in the traditions of Hecataeus of Abdera and Pompeius Trogus]. The Journal of Science and Education “ISTORIYA”, 12(12-1, no. 110). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840018592-0. (In Russian).

15. Ladynin, I. A. (2024). Tsar’ Ramses i Baktriia. Ob odnom motive pozdneegipetskogo istoriopisaniia [King Ramesses and Bactria: A motif of the late Egyptian history writing]. Vestnik drevnei istorii, 84(1), 5–26. (In Russian).

16. Ladynin, I. A. (2025). Kanaly Sesostrisa: eshche raz o sledakh siuzheta porazheniia egipetskogo tsaria skifami u Gerodota [Sesostris’ canals: Once again on the story of Egyptian king defeated by the Scythians indicated in Herodotus’ narrative]. Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia, 29(1), 1039–1048.

17. Ladynin, I. A., & Nemirovsky, A. A. (2023). Proiskhozhdenie i veroiatnaia istoricheskaia osnova antichnoi traditsii o porazhenii legendarnogo egipetskogo tsaria-zavoevatelia ot skifov [Origin and Probable historical basis of ancient tradition about the defeat of the legendary Egyptian conqueror-king from the Scythians]. Scripta antiqua. Voprosy drevnei istorii, filologii, iskusstva i material’noi kul’tury, 11, 11–48. (In Russian).

18. Nemirovsky, A. A. (2001). U istokov drevneevreiskogo etnogeneza: vetkhozavetnoe predanie o patriarkhakh i etnopoliticheskaia istoriia Blizhnego Vostoka [At the start of the ancient Hebrew ethnogenesis: The Old Testament tale of the patriarchs and the ethnopolitical history of the Near East] (n. p.). (In Russian).

19. Obsomer, Cl. (1989). Les campagnes de Sésostris dans Hérodote. Connaissance de l’Égypte ancienne.

20. Oellig, M. (2023). Die Sukzession von Weltreichen: Zu den antiken Wurzeln einer geschichtsmächtigen Idee. Franz Steiner.

21. Perrin, A. B., & Stuckenbruck, L. T. (Eds.) (2021). Four kingdom motifs before and beyond the Book of Daniel. Brill.

22. Pizzone, A. (2017). The Historiai of John Tzetzes: a Byzantine ‘Book of Memory’? Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 41(2), 182–207.

23. Pongratz-Leisten, B. (1997). The interplay of military strategy and cultic practice in Assyrian politics. In S. Parpola, & R. M. Whiting (Eds.). Assyria 1995: Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Symposium of the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki, September 7–11, 1995 (pp. 245–252). Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project.

24. Römer, C. (2017). The Nile in the Fayum: Strategies of dominating and using the water resources of the river in the oasis in the Middle Kingdom and the Graeco-Roman period. In H. Willems, & J.-M. Dahms (Eds.). The Nile: Natural and cultural landscape in Egypt (pp. 171–191). Transcript.

25. Rung, E. V., & Venidiktova, E. A. (2023). Metafora iarma v Drevnem mire: ot simvola imperskogo gospodstva do simvola podchineniia [The yoke as a metaphor in the ancient world: From symbolizing imperial domination to signifying subjugation]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta, Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki, 165(4–5), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.4-5.54-65. (In Russian).

26. Sedov, A. V. (Ed.). (2004). Istoriia drevnego Vostoka: Ot rannikh gosudarstvennykh obrazovanii do drevnikh imperii [The history of ancient Orient: From the early polities to the ancient empires]. Izdatel’skaia firma “Vostochnaia literatura” RAN. (In Russian).

27. Seel, O. (1955). Die Praefatio des Pompeius Trogus. Universitätsbund.

28. Waters, M. (2017). Ctesias’ Persica and its Near Eastern context. The Univ. of Wisconsin Press.