Vicious priests in the texts of Late Antiquity and Early Modernity: The unity of topics and the difference of contexts
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-3-108-128
Abstract
The article considers the problem of early modern anticlericalism through the lens of topos studies. It is argued that the anticlerical description of the priest possesses the same traits in various philosophical and historical texts of the 17–18th centuries written by authors who did not share the same views even on the clergy. These traits, ambition and avarice, lead to the tyranny of the religious leaders, which is established by means of superstition and ritual (not by direct violence). Tyranny leads to the corruption of the laity, both morally and religiously. This description derives from Christian Antiquity when the predominantly rhetorical topos of the tyrant is projected onto the figure of the bishop. In patristic texts, this topos served as the cultural antimodel, as opposed to the image of the saintly bishop. The realization of this or that model depended on the qualities (vices or virtues) of the person carrying out the bishop’s duties. In the early modern texts, this topos is at the core of the image of the clergy as a whole, which is used to criticize the state of priests in general. The explanatory framework of this corrupted character of the clergy (which may vary) appears later than the stable image of vicious priests.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant № 19-78-10143, https://rscf.ru/en/project/19-78-10143. The project was organized by St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University.
About the Author
S. A. Vorontsov
St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Vorontsov - Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) Research Fellow, Ecclesiactic Institutiotns Research Laboratory, Faculty of Theology
127051, Moscow, Likhov Lane, 6, ld. 1
Tel.: +7 (495) 114-50-69
References
1. Anscombe, G. E. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(no. 124), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100037943.
2. Antonov, N. K. (2021). K voprosu ob avtorskoi strategii svt. Grigoriia Bogoslova v ego “Apologii” (Slovo 3 / Or. 2) [On the question of the author’s strategy of St. Gregory the Theologian in the “Apology for His Flight” (Or. 2)]. Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoi dukhovnoi seminarii, 35, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-5391-2021-35-31-51. (In Russian).
3. Barnett, S. J. (1999). Idol temples and crafty priests: The origins of Enlightenment anticlericalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Barnett, S. J. (2003). The Enlightenment and religion. Manchester Univ. Press.
5. Birkin, M. Yu. (2020). Durnoi episkop kak tiran v “Sententsiiakh” Isidora Sevil’skogo [Evil bishop as tyrant in Isidore of Seville’s Sententiae]. Shagi / Steps, 6(2), 259–291. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2020-6-2-259-291. (In Russian).
6. Birkin, M. Yu. (2022). Tiranicheskaia vlast’ episkopa i sotsial’noe prostranstvo: kazus Meridy kontsa VI v. [Tyrannical power of the bishop and social space: The case of Mérida in the late 6th century]. Shagi / Steps, 8(3), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-3-137-167. (In Russian).
7. Curtius, E. (1948). Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. A. Francke Verlag. (In German).
8. Daniel, S. H. (1984). John Toland: His methods, manners, and mind. McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press. Daston, L. (1998). The Nature of nature in early modern Europe. Configurations, 6, 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1998.0014.
9. Di Lauro, F. (2007). ‘The Gracious and Favouring Interposition of God’: Eusebius and Divine Providence”. In V. Barker, & F. Di Lauro (Eds.). On a panegyrical note: Studies in honour of Garry W. Trompf (pp. 205–223). Univ. of Sydney.
10. Dockter, H. (2013). Klerikerkritik im antiken Christentum. Bonn Univ. Press. (In German).
11. Dunkle, J. R. (1971). The rhetorical tyrant in Roman historiography: Sallust, Livy and Tacitus. The Classical World, 65(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/4347532.
12. Elm, S. (2015). Apology as autobiography — An episcopal genre? Emperor Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, Augustine of Hippo. In J. Stenger (Ed.). Spätantike Konzeptionen von Literatur (Vol. 2, 33–49). Winter.
13. Gaddis, M. (2005). There is no crime for those who have Christ: Religious violence in the Christian Roman Empire. Univ. of California Press.
14. Hadot, P. (1987). Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Etudes augustiniennes. (In French).
15. Henny, S. (2018). Caught in the crossfire of early modern controversy: Strabo on Moses and his corrupt successors. Intellectual History Review, 28, 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2018.1402440.
16. Iliffe, R. (1999). Those “whose business it is to Cavill”: Newton’s anti-Catholicism. In J. E. Force, & R. H. Popkin (Eds.). Newton and religion: Context, nature, and influence (pp. 97–119). Springer.
17. Kors, A. C. (1990). Atheism in France, 1650–1729. Vol. 1: The Orthodox sources of disbelief. Princeton Univ. Press.
18. Lancaster, J. A. T., & McKenzie-McHarg, A. (2018). Priestcraft: Anatomizing the anti-clericalism of early modern Europe. Intellectual History Review, 28(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2018.1402436
19. Makhov, A. E. (2008). Topos. In N. D. Tamarchenko (Ed.). Poetika: Slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i poniatii (pp. 264–266). Izdatel’stvo Kulaginoi; Intrada. (In Russian).
20. Miuller, V. K. (1971). Anglo-russkii slovar’ [English-Russian dictionary]. Sovetskaia Entsiklopediia. (In Russian).
21. Parsons, W. (1942). The Medieval theory of the tyrant. The Revue of Politics, 4(2), 129–143.
22. Pocock, J. G. A. (2010). Barbarism and religion. Vol. 5: Religion: The first triumph. Cambridge Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778438.
23. Rapp, C. (2005). Holy bishops in Late Antiquity: The nature of Christian leadership in an age of transition. Univ. of California Press.
24. Reboul, O. (1970). Kant et la religion. Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 50(2), 137–154. (In French). https://doi.org/10.3406/rhpr.1970.4010.
25. Rotenstreich, N. (1980). Hypostasis and fetishmaking: Kant’s concepts and their transformations. Kant-Studien, 71(1–4), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1980.71.1-4.60.
26. Schneewind, J. B. (1990). The misfortunes of virtue. Ethics, 101(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/293259.
27. Straw, C. (1988). Gregory the Great: Perfection in imperfection. Univ. of California Press.
28. Tabacco, R. (1985). Il tiranno nelle declamazioni di scuola in lingua latina: memoria. Accademia delle scienze. (In Italian).
Review
For citations:
Vorontsov S.A. Vicious priests in the texts of Late Antiquity and Early Modernity: The unity of topics and the difference of contexts. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(3):108-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-3-108-128
Views:
55
Email this article 