Royal counselors and nobles in Hincmar of Reims’s political concept
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-2-68-87
Abstract
This article is devoted to the role of royal counselors and nobles in Hincmar of Reims’s political concept. The study is based on political instructions of the prelate of Reims, such as “De regis persona et regio ministerio” and “De ordine palatii”, as well as the letters of the archbishop and his compilation of the Annals of St Bertin. Analysis of Hincmar’s texts shows that royal power was based on harmony between the king, the nobility, and the clergy. Drawing attention to contemporary events, the prelate of Reims criticizes both representatives of the nobility in the Kingdom of the West Franks, and the kings who indulge them. In Hincmar’s opinion, the only way for a king to rule virtuously and rightfully is to rely on the advice of just and wise counselors. The virtues of the royal inner circle are the same as the virtues of the king: justice, mercy, wisdom, piety, humility. The Reims prelate envisions a bishop as the ideal royal advisor. Moreover, since the priest is responsible to the Lord for the king’s deeds, he must strictly observe the fulfilment of king’s duties. In this regard, Hincmar constructs the office of an apocrisiarius-archcapellan, an envoy from the Frankish episcopate, who would supervise all church affairs at court and guide the king’s ethics as well.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research programme.
About the Author
N. A. Fedonnikov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Fedonnikov - PhD Student, Senior Lecturer, World History Department, Institute for Social Science
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
Тел.: +7 (499) 956-99-99
References
1. Airlie, S. (2017). Power and its problems in Carolingian Europe. Routledge.
2. Anton, H. H. (1968). Fürstenspiegel und Herrscherethos in der Karolingerzeit. Ludwig Röhrscheid Verlag. (In German).
3. Bachrach, B. (2002). Charlemagne and the Carolingian general staff. The Journal of Military History, 66(2), 313–357.
4. Bloch, M. L. (1924). Les rois thaumaturges: étude sur le caractère surnaturel attribué à la puissance royale, particulièrement en France et en Angleterre. Librairie Istra. (In French).
5. Brühl, C. (1964). Hinkmariana I. Hinkmar und die Verfasserschaft des Traktats “De ordine palatii”. In F. Baethgen, & H. Grundmann (Eds.). Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters (Vol. 20, pp. 48–54). Bohlau. (In German).
6. Brunner, H. (1906). Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte (Vol. 1). Duncker & Humblot. (In German).
7. Devisse, J. (1976). Hincmar, Archevêque de Reims (845–882). Droz. (In French).
8. Duby, G. (1972). L’histoire des systèmes de valeurs. History and Theory, 11(1), 15–25. (In French).
9. Dumézil, B. (2010). Écrire pour le bien de tous. Définition et éloge du bien commun dans les correspondances de l’époque mérovingienne. Revue française d’histoire des idées politiques, 32, 231–243. (In French).
10. Estey, F. N. (1947). The meaning of placitum and mallum in the capitularies. Speculum, 22(3), 435–439
11. Fustel de Coulanges, N. D. (1905). La cité antique: étude sur le culte, droit, les institutions de la Grèce et de Rome. Hachette. (In French).
12. Ganshof, F. L. (1971). The institutional framework of the Frankish monarchy: a survey of its general characteristics. In F. L. Ganshof (Ed.). The Carolingians and the Frankish monarchy (pp. 86–110). Cornell Univ. Press.
13. Guizot, F. P. G. (1846) Histoire de la civilisation en France, depuis la chute de l’Empire romain. (Vol. 2). Didier. (In French).
14. Jong, M. de. (2009). The penitential state: Authority and atonement in the age of Louis the Pious, 814–840. Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Latowsky, A. A. (2013). Emperor of the world: Charlemagne and the construction of imperial authority, 800–1229. Cornell Univ. Press.
16. Le Jan, R. (2006). Élites et révoltes à l’époque carolingienne: crise des élites ou crise des modèles? In F. Bougard, L. Feller, & R. Le Jan (Eds.). Les élites au haut Moyen Age: Crises et renouvellements (pp. 403–423). Brepols Publishers. (In French).
17. Le Jan, R. (2011). Les élites carolingiennes et le roi au milieu du IXe siècle: statut et fidélité. In B. Matthias, & D. Stefanie (Eds.). Reiche und Namen im Frühen Mittelalter (pp. 335–346). Brill. (In French).
18. Liu, Y. (2015). Admonition, episcopal authority and the uses of the Carolingian past. Hincmar’s De Ordine Palatii in context. Journal of Ancient Civilizations, 30, 150–169.
19. Löwe, H. (1972). Hinkmar von Reims und der Apocrisiar. Beiträge zur Interpretation von “De ordine palatii”. In Festschrift für Hermann Heimpel zum 70. Geburtstag (Vol. 3, pp. 197– 225). Göttingen. (In German).
20. McKitterick, R. (1977). The Frankish Church and the Carolingian reforms, 789–895. Royal Historical Society.
21. McKitterick, R. (1996). Unity and diversity in the Carolingian church. Studies in Church History, 32, 59–82.
22. Moesch, S. (2020). Augustine and the art of ruling in the Carolingian imperial period: Political discourse in Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims. Routledge.
23. Nelson, J. L. (1986). Politics and ritual in early medieval Europe. The Hambledon Press.
24. Nelson, J. L. (1991). The Annals of St-Bertin: Ninth-century histories, Volume I. In J. L. Nelson (Ed.). The Annals of St-Bertin (pp. 1–19). Manchester Univ. Press.
25. Petrushevskiι, D. M. (1913). Ocherki iz istorii srednevekovogo obshchestva i gosudarstva [Essays on the history of medieval society and state]. Nauchnoe slovo. (In Russian).
26. Prichard, J. C. (1849). The life and times of Hincmar, Archbishop of Rheims. Littlemore.
27. Rosenthal, T. J. (1964). The public assembly in the time of Louis the Pious. Traditio, 20, 25–40.
28. Schrörs, H. (1884). Hinkmar, Erzbischof von Reims. Sein Leben und seine Schriften. Herder. (In German).
29. Sidorov, A. I. (2000). Blizhnii krug frankskogo korolia v pervoi polovine IX veka: povedencheskie idealy i kul’turnaia praktika (po materialam khroniki Nitharda) [The inner circle of the Frankish king in the first half of the 9th century: Behavioral ideals and cultural practice (based on Nithard’s Chronicle)]. In A. I. Sidorov, & M. A. Timofeev (Eds.). Srednevekovaia Еvropa: Problemy ideologii i politiki: K 70-letiiu prof. I. A. Dvoretskoi (pp. 80–102). V. Iu. Sekachev. (In Russian).
30. Sidorov, A. I. (2003). Organizatsiia vlasti vo frankskom korolevstve v VIII–IX vv. [Organization of power in the Frankish kingdom in the 8th–9th centuries]. In A. A. Svanidze (Ed.). Srednie veka (Vol. 64, pp. 3–34). Nauka. (In Russian).
31. Starostin, D. N. (2014). Khinkmar Reimskii i struktura korolevstva frankov v kontse IX v. [Hinkmar of Reims and the structure of the Frankish kingdom at the end of the 9th century]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, Ser. 2: Istoriia, 2014(2), 52–58. (In Russian).
32. Stone, R., & West, Ch. (Eds.) (2015). Hincmar of Rheims: Life and work. Manchester Univ. Press.
33. Thierry, J. N. A. (1840). Lettres sur l’histoire de France. Société typographique Belge. (In French).
34. Ullman, W. (1969). The Carolingian Renaissance and the idea of kingship: The Birkbeck lectures 1968–9. Methuen.
35. Waitz, G. (1860). Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte (Vol. 3). Ernst Homann. (In German). С. 3–34.
Review
For citations:
Fedonnikov N.A. Royal counselors and nobles in Hincmar of Reims’s political concept. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(2):68-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-2-68-87
Views:
50
Email this article 