Preview

Shagi / Steps

Advanced search

The one who declaims poems: The ritual nature of the poetic bonfire

https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-1-270-296

Abstract

This article provides research into poetic bonfires, a collective reading practice in modern Russia, for example, the Marina Tsvetaeva bonfire and the Nikolay Rubtsov bonfire. On the popular poets’ death day or birthday, readers gather to read his or her poems and sing songs in a special place related to the poet’s biography. This practice is important in the context of reading practices and the formation and maintenance of a readers / reading community. The authors interpreted through the prism of cultural anthropology collected materials such as ethnographic diaries with thick descriptions and interviews. The authors make the assumption that poetic bonfires, with their ritualistic nature, are connected with the concept of cosmos (everything has to exist in right order). The cosmology of poetic bonfires is set through the repetition of behavioral templates, for example, reading poems and making the bonfire, and by semiotization of the area where the poetic bonfire takes place through the biography of the poet and the readers’ own poetry. Legitimization of the poetic bonfire depends on these factors, but at the same time, in most cases the poetic bonfire itself is informal. Therefore, the informal status of the poetic bonfire makes it a safe space and a special emotional refuge for the participants. The rituality that characterizes poetic bonfires allows participants to unite as a whole group with their own rules and behavioral models.

About the Authors

S. S.  Levochskiy
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergey S. Levochskiy, Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) Associate Professor, Institute of Medical Sociology, Healthcare Economics and Medical Insurance

119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya Str., 8



E. F.  Levochskaia
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Elena F. Levochskaia, Cand. Sci. (Philology) Senior Researcher, Research Laboratory of Complex Historical Research

119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82



A. M.  Morozova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Anastasia M. Morozova, Student, Institute of Social Sciences

119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82



References

1. Adon’eva, S. (2009). Dukh naroda i drugie dukhi [The spirit of the nation and other spirits]. T8 Izdatel’skie Tekhnologii; Pal’mira. (In Russian).

2. Baiburin, A. K. (1993). Ritual v traditsionnoi kul’ture: Strukturno-semanticheskii analiz vostochnoslavianskikh obriadov [Ritual in traditional culture: Structural-semantic analysis of East Slavic ceremonies]. Nauka. (In Russian).

3. Bogomolov, N. A. (2019). Bardovskaia pesnia glazami literaturoveda [Bard song through the eyes of a literary critic]. Izdatel’ski tsentr “Azbukovnik”. (In Russian).

4. Dzhagalov, R. (2009). Avtorskaia pesnia kak zhanrovaia laboratoriia “sotsializma s chelovecheskim litsom” [Authorʼs song as a genre laboratory of “socialism with a human face”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 100, 204–215. (In Russian).

5. Kriuchkov, P. M. (2011). Delo o Dome [The House case]. Voprosy literatury, 2011(3), 368– 439. (In Russian).

6. Kukulin, I. (2012). Zarifmovannoe soobshchestvo [The rhymed community]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012(2, no. 114), 255–260. (In Russian).

7. Leach, E. (1976). Culture and communication. The logic by which symbols are connected. An introduction to the use of structuralist analysis in social anthropology. Cambridge Univ. Press.

8. Levochskiy, S. S., Levochskaia (Yugai), E. F., & Kupriianova, A. S. (2022). Ia / my — Rubtsov: povsednevnye praktiki prisvoeniia poezii [I/we — Rubtsov: Everyday practices of appropriating poetry]. Shagi / Steps, 8(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-2-233-253. (In Russian).

9. Levochskiy, S. S., Levochskaia, E. F., & Savitskaia, Ia. A. (2023). Antropologiia literaturnykh sobranii (2020–2022) [The anthropology of literary meetings (2020–2022)]. Novyi mir, 2023(1), 150–178. (In Russian).

10. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (2000). Struktura i funktsiia mifa [The structure and functions of myth]. In K. Aimermakher, F. Bomsdorf, & G. Bordiukov (Eds.). Mify i mifologiia v sovremennoi Rossii (pp. 17–38). AIRO-XX. (In Russian).

11. Reddy, W. M. (2001). The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. Cambridge Univ. Press.

12. Rosenwein, B. H. (2002). Worrying about emotions in history. The American Historical Review, 107(3), 821–845.

13. Shevelenko, I. D. (2002). Literaturnyi put’ Tsvetaevoi: Ideologiia — poetika — identichnost’ avtora v kontekste epokhi [The literature journey of Tsvetaeva: Ideology — poetics — identity of the author in in the context of her epoch]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

14. Venediktova, T. D. (2018). Literatura kak opyt, ili Burzhuaznyi chitatel’ kak kul’turnyi geroi [Literature as experience, or the Bourgeois reader as cultural hero]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

15. Warner, L. W. (1959). The living and the dead. Yale Univ. Press.

16. Yugai, E. F., & Bogatyreva, I. S. (2021). “Mudrets v poezii i durynda v zhizni”: Samoprezentatsiia sovremennogo poeta v povsednevnosti [“A sage in poetry, a fool in life”: Selfrepresentation of the contemporary poet in everyday life]. Shagi / Steps, 7(1), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2021-7-1-239-275. (In Russian).

17. Zelenin, D. K. (1909). Narodnyi obychai “gret’ pokoinikov”. (Iz XVIII t. Sbornika Khar’kovskogo Istoriko-Filologicheskogo Obshchestva, izdannogo v chest’ professora N. F. Sumtsova) [Folk custom to “warm the dead”. From the 18th volume of the Collection of the Kharkov Historical and Philological Society, published in honor of Professor N. F. Sumtsov)]. Tipografiia “Pechatnoe delo”. (In Russian).

18. Zorin, A. L. (2016). Poiavlenie geroia: Iz istorii russkoi emotsional’noi kul’tury kontsa XVIII — nachala XIX veka [The rise of a hero: From the history of Russian emotional culture, late 18th century and early 19th century]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

19. Zorin, A. L., & Nemzer, A. S. (1989). Paradoksy chuvstvitel’nosti [Paradoxes of sensitivity]. In A. A. Il’in-Tomich (Ed.). “Stolet’ia ne sotrut…”: Russkie klassiki i ikh chitateli (pp. 7–54). Kniga. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Levochskiy S.S., Levochskaia E.F., Morozova A.M. The one who declaims poems: The ritual nature of the poetic bonfire. Shagi / Steps. 2024;10(1):270-296. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-1-270-296

Views: 93


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-9410 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1765 (Online)