Neo-Renaissance in the works of T. Mann
EDN: NEDVOW
Abstract
One of the most striking modernization projects in the literature of European decadence was Neo-Renaissance, which was seen as an opportunity for a profound “reassessment of values” and a tool for overcoming the cultural crisis of modernity. Similar to the Weimar classical era, the Neo-Renaissance project modernized modernity through an appeal to the forms of old culture. Along with
this cultural epoch in their theories, the main ideologists of the Neo-Renaissance were F. Nietzsche, H. Ibsen, and in Russia — D. Merezhkovsky, all of whom saw it as an unfulfilled attempt at a great cultural synthesis, the embodiment of the ancient utopia of the “Third Kingdom”. In his search for a synthetic culture, T. Mann also turns to the theme of the Renaissance. His first attempt at developing this topic was his early novel Gladius Dei (1901), in which the neo-Renaissance aestheticism of modern culture is criticized from the standpoint of Christian spiritualism. In his drama Fiorenza (1904) T. Mann continues his artistic exploration of Renaissance themes in light of the question of the essence of art. The question of the authenticity of art is examined using the essay “On the Erotic in Michelangelo” (1950) as an example.
Keywords
About the Author
A. L. VolskiyRussian Federation
Alexey Lvovich Volskiy Dr. Sci. (Philology) Professor, Department of Foreign Literatures
191186, Saint Petersburg, Moika River Emb., 48
References
1. Admoni, V., & Sil’man, T. (1960). Tomas Mann: Ocherk tvorchestva [Thomas Mann: An essay on his creative work]. Sovetskii pisatel’. (In Russian).
2. Apt, S. (1986). V iskusstve i zhizni [In art and life]. In S. Apt (Trans., Ed., Intro.). Mann T. Khudozhnik i obshchestvo: Stat’i i pis’ma (pp. 5–20). Raduga. (In Russian).
3. Febvre, L. (1953). Combats pour l’histoire. Armand Colin.
4. Fridlender, G. M. (1995). D. S. Merezhkovskii i Genrik Ibsen (U istokov religiozno-filosofskikh idei Merezhkovskogo) [D. S. Merezhkovsky and Henrik Ibsen (At the origins of Merezhkovsky’s religious and philosophical ideas)]. In G. M. Fridlender. Pushkin. Dostoevskii. Serebrianyi vek (pp. 411–434). Nauka. (In Russian).
5. Magomedova, D. M. (1993). D. S. Merezhkovskii i ego roman “Iulian Otstupnik” [D. S. Merezhkovsky and his novel Julian the Apostate]. In D. S. Merezhkovskii. Smert’ bogov. Iulian Otstupnik (pp. 3–14). Khudozhestvennaia literatura. (In Russian).
6. Miller-Budnitskaia, R. M. (1935). Gibel’ tsivilizatsii. Filosofiia kul’tury T. Manna [The death of civilization. Philosophy of culture by T. Mann]. Literaturnyi kritik, 1935(6), 130–148. (In Russian).
7. Rasch, W. (1986). Die literarische Décadence um 1900. Beck.
Review
For citations:
Volskiy A.L. Neo-Renaissance in the works of T. Mann. Shagi / Steps. 2026;12(2):244–257. (In Russ.) EDN: NEDVOW
JATS XML




































