Kang Youwei, the development of the political space of the West and the concept of freedom (treatise “An Essay on National Salvation through Material Upbuilding”)
EDN: GQTZRL
Abstract
The article examines the political doctrine of Kang Youwei (1858–1927), as set out in his treatise Wu zhi jiu guo lun (“An Essay on National Salvation through Material Upbuilding”), written in Canada in 1905 and published in 1908. While in exile after 1899 and declaring himself a modern-day Confucius, Kang Youwei carefully studied the history of the West and the political systems of contemporary European countries and the United States. The main content of the treatise is a search for the source of the power of Western imperialist powers in order to apply this experience to China. Kang Youwei came to the conclusion that Western countries “became powerful thanks to phenomenal progress in science and technology; China must achieve the same level of progress in order to survive and prosper.” There are two main reasons for the West’s superiority over China: national science and the “doctrine of the material.” By “material” Kang Youwei meant modern industrial technologies and the social realities of a globalizing world. At the center of Kang Youwei’s concept is the idea of freedom, which, like all others, he considered historically relative and dependent on the political system of the “current century.” The Chinese thinker claimed that the liberal concept of freedom imposed by Western imperialists is a product of the “feudal-slave system in Europe,” while the Chinese social system provides the vast majority of the population with basic rights and freedoms that are not suppressed by the state. The Western concept of freedom is legal, not philosophical and ideological, and contradicts human nature as interpreted by Chinese philosophical teachings. Speaking about the French Revolution, Kang Youwei emphasized that it liberated the people from oppression by the monarch but did not contribute to the ethical development of ordinary people. In China, the first thinker to raise the issue of social freedoms was Confucius, who also formulated the golden rule of morality. However, the availability of rights and freedoms is limited by the era of social development: Confucius lived in the Era of Chaos, and his teaching is adapted to its realities, determined by the flow of Tao. The Japanese adaptation of the Western interpretation of freedom during the Meiji Revolution was a great mistake of Japanese reformers and may be repeated in China, turning the country onto a path of development not dictated by the nature of Chinese society.
About the Authors
D. E. MartynovRussian Federation
Dmitry Evgenyevich Martynov, Dr. Sci. (History) Professor, Department of Chinese and Asian-Pacific Studies
420111, Kazan, Pushkin Str., 1/55
Yu. A. Martynova
Russian Federation
Yulia Aleksandrovna Martynova, Cand. Sci. (History) Associate Professor, Department of Chinese and Asian-Pacific Studies
420111, Kazan, Pushkin Str., 1/55
Liqiu Liu
China
Liu Liqiu, Cand. Sci. (History) Associate Professor, School of Foreign Studies, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
210094, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, Xuanwu, Xiaolingwei Str., 200
References
1. Bernal, M. (1976). Chinese Socialism to 1907. Cornell Univ. Press.
2. Borokh, L. N. (2001). Konfutsianstvo i evropeiskaia mysl’ na rubezhe XIX–XX vekov: Lian Tsichao: teoriia obnovleniia naroda [Confucianism and European thought at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries: Liang Qichao: theory of people’s renewal]. Vostochnaia literatura RAN. (In Russian).
3. Dong, Conglin (2020). Kang Youwei de “Wu zhi jiu guo lun” jiexi [The analysis of Kang Youwei’s “Theory of Material Salvation of the Nation”]. Anhui shixue, 1, 22–28. (In Chinese).
4. Fung, E. S. K. (2006). The idea of freedom in modern China revisited: Plural conceptions and dual responsibilities. Modern China, 32(4), 453–482.
5. Hsiao, Kung-chuan (1975). A modern China and a new world: K’ang Yu-wei, reformer and utopian, 1858–1927. Univ. of Washington Press.
6. Huang, P. C. (1993). “Public sphere” / “civil society” in China? The third realm between state and society. Modern China, 19(2), 216–240.
7. Kobzev, A. I. (2010) Ti — iun [Ti — yong (Substance and Function)]. In V. S. Stepin et al. (Eds.). Novaia filosofskaia entsiklopediia (Vol. 4, pp. 65–66). Mysl’. (In Russian).
8. Levenson, J. R. (1965). Confucian China and its modern fate: A trilogy. Univ. of California Press.
9. Ma, Honglin (1998). Kang Youwei pingzhuan [A critical biography of Kang Youwei]. Nanjing daxue chubanshe. (In Chinese).
10. Nathan, A. J. (1985). Chinese democracy. Knopf.
11. Oleynikov, I. V., & Kormich, P. S. (2018). Termin i poniatie “demokratiia” v politicheskoi zhizni Kitaia pervoi treti XX veka [The term and the concept of “democracy” in the political life of China in the first third of the XX century]. Idei i idealy, 2(2, no. 36), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2018-2.2-41-58. (In Russian).
12. Shan, Shilian (2011). “Wenming” yu “wuming” zhi bianzheng — Kang Youwei “Wu zhi jiu guo lun” de yiyi [The dialectic between “civilization” and “military wisdom” — The significance of Kang Youwei’s “Essay on National Salvation through Material Upbuilding”]. Xueshu yanjiu, 10, 33–40. (In Chinese).
13. Tang, Zhijun (1998). Kang Youwei zhuan [Kang Youwei biography]. Taiwan shanwu yinshuguan. (In Chinese).
14. Zhang, Yaoxin, & Liu, Yuanzhe (2013). Kang Youwei da zhuan [Biography of Kang Youwei]. Huazhong keji daxue chubanshe. (In Chinese).
Review
For citations:
Martynov D.E., Martynova Yu.A., Liu L. Kang Youwei, the development of the political space of the West and the concept of freedom (treatise “An Essay on National Salvation through Material Upbuilding”). Shagi / Steps. 2025;11(3):103-124. (In Russ.) EDN: GQTZRL