The problem of genesis and development of the palace as an institution in ancient Qin
EDN: EBTMTL
Abstract
The main task of this study is to determine the time of the emergence of the palace institution in the ancient Kingdom of Qin during the Spring and Autumn period (8th–5th centuries BCE) within a broader framework regarding the genesis of statehood in Qin. Here the main obstacle lies in distinguishing the moment of the emergence of Qin’s ruling clan, as well as the genesis of Qin’s main ethnic groups and archaeological culture that existed on Qin’s territory, from the moment of state formation as opposed to the other two, since all three of these phenomena emerged at different times. Thus, the task is to distinguish state institutions from those created and accompanied by kinship relations, to separate clan institutions from the political ones. The first political institution of statehood that can be reliably distinguished from kinship institutions is the palace, which is why it is important to determine the moment of its emergence and to describe the early stages of its development. The study concludes that the palace institution appeared in Qin no earlier than 697 BCE, and by 620 BCE its development entered a phase of specialization whereby its temple functions were separated from its palace functions.
Keywords
Qin,
antiquity,
ancient China,
Spring and Autumn period,
palace,
separation of temple from palace,
statehood,
institutions,
Sima Qian
Supporting agencies: The article is a part of the RANEPA state assignment research programme.
About the Author
M. S. Tseluyko
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration ; Institute of Asian and African Studies,
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim Sergeevich Tseluyko, Junior Research Fellow, Center for Oriental Studies, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Institute for Social Sciences; Senior Lecturer, Institute of Asian and African Studies
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
125009, Moscow, Mokhovaya Str., 1
References
1. Deopik, D. V., & Ul’ianov, M. Iu. (2016). Neolit istoricheskogo regiona Vostochnaia Aziia. Pozdnii neolit [Neolithic period of the historical region of East Asia. Late Neolithic]. In A. P. Derevianko (Ed.). Istoriia Kitaia s drevneishikh vremen do nachala XXI v., Vol. 1: Drevneishaia i drevniaia istoriia (po arkheologicheskim dannym). Ot paleolita do V v. do n. e. (pp. 151–302). Nauka — Vostochnaia literatura. (In Russian).
2. Grinin, L. E. (2006). Rannee gosudarstvo i ego analogi [Early state and its analogues]. In L. E. Grinin et al. (Eds.). Rannee gosudarstvo, ego al’ternativy i analogi (pp. 85–163). Uchitel’. (In Russian).
3. Grinin, L. E. (2012) Rannie gosudarstva i ikh analogi v politogeneze: tipologii i sopostavitel’nyi analiz [Early states and their analogues in politogenesis: Typologies and comparative analysis]. In V. A. Popov (Ed.). Rannie formy politicheskikh sistem (pp. 9–98) MAE RAN. (In Russian).
4. Huntington, S. P. (1973). Political order in changing societies. Yale Univ. Press.
5. Komissarov, S. A., & Khachaturian, O. A. (2016). Istoriia i kul’tura gosudarstva Tsin’ v period Chun’tsiu. Material’naia kul’tura [History and culture of the Qin State during the Spring and Autumn Period. Material culture]. In A. P. Derevianko (Ed.). Istoriia Kitaia s drevneishikh vremen do nachala XXI v., Vol. 1: Drevneishaia i drevniaia istoriia (po arkheologicheskim dannym). Ot paleolita do V v. do n. e. (pp. 863–872). Nauka — Vostochnaia literatura. (In Russian).
6. Kriukov, V. M. (2000). Tekst i ritual: Opyt interpretatsii drevnekitaiskoi epigrafiki epokhi In’- Chzhou [Experience in the interpretation of ancient Chinese epigraphy of the Yin-Zhou era]. Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli. (In Russian).
7. Kriukov, V. M. (2012). Ritual’naia kommunikatsiia v drevnem Kitae [Ritual communication in ancient China]. Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli. (In Russian).
8. Li, Feng (2017). A study of the bronze vessels and sacrificial remains of the early Qin state from Lixian, Gansu. In E. L. Shaughnessy (Ed.). Imprints of kinship: Studies of recently discovered bronze inscriptions from ancient China (pp. 209–234). The Chinese Univ. Press.
9. Li, Xueqin (1980). Qin guo wenwude xin renshi [New understanding of Qin state artifacts]. Wenwu, 1980(9), 25–31. (In Chinese).
10. Li, Xueqin (1981). Lun duo yu ding de shidai ji yiyi [On the dating and meaning of Duo Yu ding]. Renwen zazhi, 1981(6), 87–92, 129. (In Chinese).
11. Ma, Liangmin, & Lin, Xianting (1966). Haiyang zuizi qian chunqiu mu shixi [An analysis of the Haiang Zuizi Early Spring and Autumn period tomb]. Kaogu, 1966(9), 11–13. (In Chinese).
12. Shuowen jiezi = Xu Shen’s etymological dictionary (2005) (modern ed.). Social Sciences Academic Press. (In Chinese).
13. Teng, Mingyu (2003). Qin wenhua: cong fengjian guo dao diguode kaogu guancha [Qin culture in archaeological perspective: from a feudal state to great empire]. Beijing xuefan chubanshe. (In Chinese).
14. Tseluiko, M. S. (2019). Politicheskie instituty drevnei Vostochnoi Azii epokhi Chun’tsiu (VIII–V veka do n. e.): mezhdu vnutrennei i vneshnei politikoi [Political institutions of the ancient East Asia in the Chunqiu Period (VII–V B. C.) between the internal and external politics]. Vestnik Universiteta Dmitriia Pozharskogo, 2019(3, no. 15), 205–223. (In Russian).
15. Tseluiko, M. S. (2021). Nadpis’ na sosude Bu Tsi gui i vozniknovenie tsin’skogo gosudarstva [The Bu Qi Gui inscription and genesis of the Qin State]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Ser. Istoriia, filologiia, 20(10), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-10-57-71. (In Russian).
16. Ul’ianov, M. Iu., Bashkeev, V. V., & Tseluiko, M. S. (2012). Podkhody k issledovaniiu politicheskikh protsessov v opisanii drevnei i srednevekovoi istorii Kitaia i stran IugoVostochnoi Azii [Approaches to the study of political processes in the description of ancient and medieval history of China and Southeast Asian countries]. In A. M. Feofanov (Ed.). Otgolosok proshedshego v budushchem: Sbornik nauchnykh statei prepodavatelei i aspirantov Istoricheskogo fakul’teta (pp. 41–71). Izd-vo PSTGU. (In Russian).
17. Wang, Entian (1989). Ba Chuguo bingqi wangzi Fan ge [The Chu state weapon — prince Fan’s halberd]. Jianghan kaogu, 1989(4), 85–86, 95. (In Chinese).
18. Xie, Su (2023). Dui zhoudai zongmiaolei jisi yicunde kaocha [A study of the remains of Zhou Dynasty ancestral temple rituals]. Nanfang wenwu, 2023(3), 115–125. (In Chinese).
19. Yan, Yabo (2022). Cong yu ding, xia xiang pu e guo tongqi kan xizhou de zuxing [Examining Western Zhou clan punishments through the Guo bronze vessels Yu Ding, Xia xiang pu from E state]. Chutu wenxian yu falv shi shi yanjiu, 2022(2), 162–169. (In Chinese).
20. Yu, Shengwu (1963). “E jun qijie” kaoshi [An analysis of the “E Jun Qi Jie”]. Kaogu, 1963(8), 442–447, 10. (In Chinese).
21. Zaoqi Qin wenhua yanjiu ketizu [Early Qin Culture Problem Research Team] (2008). Gansu Lixian san zuo zhoudai Chengzhi diaocha baogao [Survey report on three Zhou Dynasty sites in Lixian, Gansu]. Gudai wenming, 2008(7), 323–362. (In Chinese).
22. Zhao, Huacheng (2014). New explorations of early Qin culture. In Yu. Pines (Ed.). Birth of an empire: The State of Qin revisited (pp. 53–70). Univ. of California Press.
23. Zheng, Nan (2020). Qin liu qian duchengde yuanyin he yingxiang [The reasons and impact of Qin six relocations of the capital]. Hebei beifang xueyuan xuebao (shehui kexue ban), 2020(6, no. 36), 27–30, 36. (In Chinese).
Review
For citations:
Tseluyko M.S. The problem of genesis and development of the palace as an institution in ancient Qin. Shagi / Steps. 2025;11(3):84-102. (In Russ.) EDN: EBTMTL
Views:
12
Email this article 