Dōgen’s discourse on determinism and free will in his late treatises
EDN: EMWYUT
Abstract
The article contains an analysis of three treatises by the Japanese Zen master Dōgen (1200–1253) from his collection “Treasury of the True Dharma Eye” (Shōbōgenzō, 13th century). The texts, Shukke Kudoky, Sanji Gō and Jinshin Inga, were written down in the last years of Dōgen’s life or shortly after his death by his closest student and successor, Kōun Ejō (1198–1280). The article discusses the opinions of followers of “critical Buddhism” (hihan-bukkyō) and other scholars about the place these treatises occupy in Dōgen’s legacy and what he argues in them. Analysis of the texts shows how Dōgen interpreted the problem of the relationship between the Buddhist concept of causality and free will. Recognizing the universal operation of the law of the interdependent emergence of things, Dōgen reserves the right of free choice for every person. He emphasizes that any person is personally responsible for their choice. A careful reading of Dōgen’s treatises also encourages modern people to think about the consequences of decisions that they make, about such a fundamental philosophical problem as the relationship between determination and free will. The article is followed by a translation of the treatise Jinshin Inga, which was earlier translated into Russian only from English, and therefore it’s the first translation of the text from the original bungo version.
Keywords
About the Author
M. V. BabkovaRussian Federation
Maya Vladimirovna Babkova, Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) Research Fellow, Center for Japanese Studies, Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Russia; Senior Research Fellow, Center for Oriental Studies, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Institute for Social Sciences
107031, Moscow, Rozhdestvenka Str., 12
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
References
1. Babkova, M. V. (2016). Nastavnik sozertsaniia Dogen: zhizn’ i sochineniia: Vmestilishche suti istinnogo Zakona [Dōgen Zenji: Life and written works: Treasury of the essence of the true dharma]. Krug’’. (In Russian).
2. Babkova, M. V., & Trubnikova, N. N. (2019). Dzenskaia obshchina glazami nastavnika Dogena [The Zen community as viewed by Dōgen Zenji]. Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. (In Russian).
3. Hakamaya, Noriaki (1990). Hihan bukkyō [Critical Buddhism]. Taizō shuppan. (In Japanese).
4. Heine, S. (1994). “Critical Buddhism” (hihan bukkyō) and the debate concerning the 75-fascicle and 12-fascicle Shōbōgenzō texts. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 21(1), 37–72.
5. Heine, S. (1997). The Dōgen canon: Dōgen’s pre-Shobogenzo writings and the question of change in his later works. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 24(1–2), 39–85.
6. Heine, S. (1999). Shifting shape, shaping text: Philosophy and folklore in the fox kōan. Univ. of Hawaii Press.
7. Heine, S. (2021). Dogen: Japan’s original Zen teacher. Shambala.
8. Kagamishima, Genryū, & Suzuki, Kakuzen (1991). Junnikanbon Shōbōgenzō-no shomondai [Different problems of 12-fascicle Shōbōgenzō]. Taizō shuppan. (In Japanese).
9. Kawamura, Kōdō (1987). “Shōbōgenzō-no” seiritsuteki kenkyū [Formative and historic studies of Shōbōgenzō]. Shunjusha. (In Japanese).
10. Putney, D. (1996). Some problems in interpretation: The early and late writings of Dōgen. Philosophy East and West, 46(4), 497–531.
11. Trubnikova, N. N. (2010). Traditsiia “iskonnoi prosvetlennosti” v iaponskoi filosofskoi mysli [Hongaku tradition in Japanese philosophical thought]. Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopediia (ROSSPEN). (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Babkova M.V. Dōgen’s discourse on determinism and free will in his late treatises. Shagi / Steps. 2025;11(3):41-62. (In Russ.) EDN: EMWYUT