The logic of myth: “Crisis” and “norm” in the archaic worldview
EDN: CAJKCX
Abstract
The present study is devoted to several groups of folklore and mythological plots and motifs seen as a representation of archaic ideas about the crisis. The latter can be interpreted both as an initial ‘deficiency’ of first creation (in the long term, as an eschatological catastrophe), and as a result of purposeful (not fully thought out?) activity of the demiurge. On the basis of an analysis of a number of cosmogonic and etiological myths, it is suggested that crisis in mythic logic proves to be one of the forms of overcoming chaos, which can however give rise to a ‘second-order’ crisis and even a ‘pendular’ crisis (when each phase of overcoming the current crisis gives rise to a new crisis). The condition of ‘cosmic imbalance’ is illustrated by myths about the pacification of ‘solar chaos’, which are widespread in world folklore. In a large number of regional versions of the myth, excessive heat (light) is the starting point of the story, which suggests that such a situation is admissible within the framework of ‘mythological logic’, and therefore, the point of reference in the construction of the story is not an initial state of equilibrium, but a certain crisis that needs to be resolved. The study (1) describes the transition from the original mythological ‘anti-norm’ to the ‘formula of the impossible’ of fairy tales; (2) examines certain object realizations of mythological representations linked to images of space and time. This analysis allows us to assert that, while the image of first creation recalls the idea of morphological incompleteness and inaccessibility of the ‘natural’ state we observe around us, the ‘non-normality’ of the other world of ‘lower’ mythology highlights its deviation from this already existing ‘naturalness’.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The article is a part of the RANEPA state assignment research programme.
About the Author
S. Yu. Nekliudov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration ; Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey Yurievich Nekliudov, Dr. Sci. (Philology), Professor Chief Researcher, Center for Theoretical Folklore Studies, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Institute for Social Sciences ; Professor, Centre for Typological and Semiotic Folklore Studies
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
125993, GSP-3, Moscow, Miusskaya Sq., 6
References
1. Anikeeva, T. A. (2007). Ustnye i knizhnye elementy v tiurkskoi traditsionnoi slovesnosti: turetskaia gorodskaia povest’ [Oral and literary elements in traditional Turkic literature: Turkish urban novels] (Cand. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, Russian State University for the Humanities). 2007. (In Russian).
2. Arkhipova, A S., & Koz’min A. V. (2010). Chego ne bylo u kitaitsev? Kommentarii k dvum mongol’skim zapisiam G. N. Potanina (skazochnye siuzhety ATU 1920H i ATU 852) [What did the Chinese not have? Commentary on two Mongolian records by G. N. Potanin (fairy tale plots ATU 1920H and ATU 852)]. In I. S. Smirnov, & N. R. Lidova (Eds.). Kitai i okrestnosti: mifologiia, fol’klor, literatura: K 75-letiiu akademika B. L. Riftina (pp. 159–183). RGGU. (In Russian).
3. Bateson, G., & Mead, M. (1942). Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York Academy of Sciences.
4. Berezkin, Yu. E. (2023). Soliarnaia mifologiia Vostochnoi Azii i drugikh regionov [The solar mythology of Eastern Asia and other regions]. Fol’klor: struktura, tipologiia, semiotika, 6(4), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-4-51-79. (In Russian).
5. Chashchin, V. P. (1979). Polovaia zrelost’ petukhov i vliianie ee na produktivnye i vosproizvoditel’nye kachestva potomstva [Puberty of roosters and its influence on productive and reproductive qualities of offspring: Industrial poultry farming and prevention of bird diseases]. In I. K. Kazankov (Ed.). Trudy Zapadno-sibirskoi zonal’noi opytnoi stantsii po ptitsevodstvu Sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo veterinarnogo instituta, Vol. 1: Promyshlennoe ptitsevodstvo i profilaktika boleznei ptits (pp. 70–74) (n. e.). (In Russian).
6. Chashchin, V. P. (1980). Sovershenstvovanie priemov otbora petukhov s tsel’iu povysheniia ikh vosproizvoditel’nykh kachestv [Improving methods of selecting roosters in order to increase their reproductive qualities] (Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Agriculture) Thesis, AllUnion Scientific Research and Technological Institute of Aviculture). (In Russian).
7. Chesnov, Ia. V. (1988). Miao-iao mifologiia [Miao-Yao mythology]. In S. A. Tokarev (Ed.). Mify narodov mira: Entsiklopediia (Vol. 2, pp. 192–193). Sovetskaia entsiklopediia. (In Russian).
8. Emel’ianov, N. V. (1990). Siuzhety iakutskikh olonkho o rodonachal’nikakh plemeni [Stories of Yakut olonkho about the ancestors of the tribe]. Nauka. (In Russian).
9. Emel’ianov, N. V. (1991). Siuzhety olonkho i etapy razvitiia iakutskogo eposa [Stories of olonkho and stages of development of the Yakut epic] (Dr. Sci. (Philology) Thesis in the form of scientific report, A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature). (In Russian).
10. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
11. Gilhodes, C. (1922). The Kachins: Religion and customs. Catholic Orphan Mission Press.
12. Ginzburg, C. (1976). Il formaggio e i vermi. Il cosmo di un mugnaio del ‘500. Einaudi.
13. Gondatti, N. L. (1888). Sledy iazychestva u inorodtsev Severo-Zapadnoi Sibiri [Traces of paganism among the indigenous peoples of North-West Siberia]. Tipografiia E. I. Potapova. (In Russian).
14. Hanson, O. (1913). The Kachins: Their customs and traditions. American Baptist Mission Press F. D. Phinney.
15. Kretov, A. (1994). Skazki rekursivnoi struktury [Fairy tales of recursive structure]. In P. Reifman (Ed.). Trudy po russkoi i slavianskoi filologii. Literaturovedenie (New Ser., Vol. 1, pp. 204–214). Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus. (In Russian).
16. Makarov, S. S. (forthcoming). Iakutskii epos olonkho: poetika ustnogo povestvovaniia [Yakut epic olonkho: poetics of oral narration] (S. Yu. Nekliudov, Ed.). IMLI RAN. (In Russian).
17. Mamonova, S. K. (2024). Russkaia fol’klornaia nebylitsa: problema genezisa, poetika i pragmatika teksta [Russian folklore fable: the problem of genesis, poetics and pragmatics of the text] (MA Thesis, Russian State University for the Humanities). (In Russian).
18. Matiushina, I. G. (1994). Magiia slova: Skal’dicheskie khulitel’nye stikhi i liubovnaia poeziia [The magic of the word. Skaldic blasphemous verses and love poetry]. Russian State University for the Humanities. (In Russian).
19. Meletinskii, E. M. (1976). Poetika mifa [Poetics of myth]. Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury izdаtel’stva “Nauka”. (In Russian).
20. Meletinskii, E. M. (2018). Mif i istoricheskaia poetika: Izbrannye stat’i. Vospominaniia [Myth and historical poetics: Selected articles. Memoirs] (3rd ed., enl.; E. S. Novik, Ed., S. Yu. Nekliudov, Intro., N. Iu. Kostenko, Bibliography). RGGU. (In Russian).
21. Meletinskii, E. M., Nekliudov S. Yu., Novik, E. S., & Segal, D. M. (2023). Struktura volshebnoi skazki [Structure of the fairy tale] (2nd ed., rev. and enl.). RGGU. (In Russian).
22. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
23. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (2015). Poetika epicheskogo povestvovaniia: prostranstvo i vremia [Poetics of epic narrative: space and time]. Forum. (In Russian).
24. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (2023). Skazochnyi siuzhet kak produkt literaturno-fol’klornogo sinteza: kazus AaTh 485A [Adventure tale plot as a product of literary and folkloric synthesis: Case AaTh 485A]. Shagi / Steps, 9(3), 30–86. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-3-30-86. (In Russian).
25. Propp, V. Ia. (1969). Morfologiia skazki [Morphology of the fairy tale] (2nd ed.). Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury izdаtel’stva “Nauka”. (In Russian).
26. Riftin, B. L. (2023). Sravnitel’nyi analiz legendy o strelke po solntsu: ot Amura do Taivania [Comparative analysis of the legend of the shooter on the sun. From the Amur to Taiwan] (A. B. Starostin, Ed.). Fol’klor: struktura, tipologiia, semiotika, 6(4), 14–50. https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-4-14-50. (In Russian).
27. Roshiianu [= Roşianu], N. (1974). Traditsionnye formuly skazki [Traditional formulas of a fairy tale]. Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury izdаtel’stva “Nauka”. (In Russian).
28. Stocks, C. de Beauvoir (1925). Folk-lore and customs of the Lap-chas of Sikhim. Journal and Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, New Ser., 21(4), 325–505.
29. Toporov, V. N. (1988). Khaos pervobytnyi [Primordial chaos]. In S. A. Tokarev (Ed.). Mify narodov mira: Entsiklopediia (Vol. 2, pp. 581–582). Sovetskaia entsiklopediia. (In Russian).
30. Toporova, T. V. (2023). Dr.-isl. ginnunga gap ‘ziianii bezdna’ v “Starshei” i “Mladshei Edde” [O.-Icel. ginnunga gap ‘abyss of yawnings’ in the Elder and Younger Edda]. Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia, 27(2), 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp230690152777. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Nekliudov S.Yu. The logic of myth: “Crisis” and “norm” in the archaic worldview. Shagi / Steps. 2025;11(3):15-40. (In Russ.) EDN: CAJKCX
Views:
10
Email this article 