The figures of David and Herod the Great in light of the idea of kingly power in the Second Temple Period
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-3-119-136
Abstract
This article is dedicated to an analysis of the influence of King David’s image on the image of Herod the Great. As yet no studies have focused on the comparison of these two historical figures and on uncovering the connections between them, as well as on the degree of influence that one of them had on the other. The author assumes that in the Second Temple Period the history of David became a myth by which kingly power was legitimized. Through a parallel comparison of characteristic passages from David’s and Herod’s biographies the answers to several questions are given: whether the resemblance between the two life stories was accidental or not; why the image of David was chosen for the description of Herod’s history; which religious motives could have influenced this choice. The author claims, using Sunden’s role theory, that Herod turned out to be similar to the biblical king not only owing to the ingenuity of the chroniclers, but also due to the possibility of his self-identification with the image from the Old Testament. The religious traditions of Jewish society influenced not only the Jerusalem cult and the literature of that period, but also the political sphere.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-311-90023
About the Author
A. Iu. Sgonnova
St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandra Iu. Sgonnova - Postgraduate Student, Junior Researcher, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies.
127051, Moscow, Likhov Pereulok, 6, Tel.: +7 (495) 536-93-13
References
1. Alter, R. (2000). The David story: A translation with commentary of 1 and 2 Samuel. W. W. Norton.
2. Astapova, O. (2020). Istoki sakralizatsii vlasti. Sviashchennaia vlast’ v drevnikh tsarstvakh Egipta, Mesopotamii, Izrailia [The origins of sacralisation of state power. Sacred power in ancient kingdoms of Egypt, Mesopotamia and Israel]. RIPOL klassik. (In Russian).
3. Davies, P. R. (1992). In search of “Ancient Israel”. JSOT Press.
4. Elazar, D. J., & Cohen, S. A. (1989). The Jewish polity: Jewish political organization from Biblical times to the present. Indiana Univ. Press.
5. Feldman, L. H. (1998). Josephus’ interpretation of the Bible. Univ. of California Press. Garbini, G. (2009). Myth and history in the Bible. Bloomsbury.
6. Garfinkel, Y. (2018). In the footsteps of King David: Revelations from an Ancient Biblical city. Thames & Hudson.
7. Grabbe, L. L. (2010). Introduction to Second Temple Judaism: History and religion of the Jews
8. in the time of Nehemiah, the Maccabees, Hillel and Jesus. T&T Clark International.
9. Grant, M. (1971). Herod the Great. American Heritage Press.
10. Gunn, D. M. (1989). The story of King David: Genre and interpretation. JSOT Press, Dept. of Biblical Studies, Univ. of Sheffield.
11. Holm, N. G. (1987). Sundén’s role theory and glossolalia. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26(3), 383–389.
12. Knohl, I. (2000). The Messiah before Jesus: The suffering servant of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Univ. of California Press.
13. Meletinskii, E. M. (Ed.) (1991). Mifologicheskii slovar’ [Mythological dictionary]. Sovetskaia entsiklopediia. (In Russian).
14. Miller, V. (2019). A king and a fool? The succession narrative as a satire. Brill.
15. Propp, V. Ia. (2001). Morfologiia volshebnoi skazki [Morphology of the folktale]. Labirint. (In Russian).
16. Sanders, E. P. (1992). Judaism: Practice and Belief, 63 BCE – 66 CE. SCM Press.
17. Seleznev, M. G. (2017). Βασιλεύς i ἄρχων v Septuaginte: grecheskie ekvivalenty Evreiskogo Slova “tsar’” i otnoshenie k tsarskoi vlasti v iudaizme III v. do n. e. [Βασιλεύς and ἄρχων in the Septuagint: Greek translations of the Hebrew word “king” and the attitude towards kings in the Egyptian Diaspora of the 3rd century]. Shagi / Steps, 3(4), 47–63. (In Russian).
18. Sgonnova, A. (2019). Messiia, tsar’, prorok: sviashchennicheskoe mirovozzrenie v knige Iosifa Flaviia “Iudeiskaia voina” i v mezhzavetnoi literature [Messiah, king, prophet: Priestly ideology in the Jewish War by Josephus Flavius and in intertestamental literature]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, Ser. 1, Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 81, 105–118. (In Russian).
19. Shalev, M. (2005). The First and Second Book of Samuel. In Revelations: Personal responses to the books of the Bible (pp. 71–88). Canongate.
20. Shmaina-Velikanova, A. (2010). Kniga Rufi kak simvolicheskaia povest’ [Book of Ruth as symbolic tale]. Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy. (In Russian).
21. Sundén, H. (1966). Die Religion und die Rollen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung der Frömmigkeit (pp. 1–22). Alfred Töpelmann. (In German).
22. Veinberg, I. P. (2004). Drevneevreiskoe gosudarstvo: ideia i real’nost’ [Kingdom of Israel:
23. Idea and reality]. In E. A. Grantovskii, & T. V. Stepugina (Eds.). Gosudarstvo na Drevnem Vostoke (pp. 300–310). Vostochnaia literatura. (In Russian).
24. Veviurko, I. S. (2018). Septuaginta: drevnegrecheskii tekst Vetkhogo Zaveta v istorii religioznoi mysli [The Septuagint: The Ancient Greek text of the Old Testament in the history of religious thought]. Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
25. Vikhnovich, V. L. (Ed., Intro., Comment.). (2010). Kniga Iroda: Antologiia [Herod’s Book: An anthology]. OOO “Izdatel’stvo “Pal’mira””. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Sgonnova A.I. The figures of David and Herod the Great in light of the idea of kingly power in the Second Temple Period. Shagi / Steps. 2022;8(3):119-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-3-119-136
Views:
61
Email this article 