Oral stories about the rescue of Jews during the Holocaust: Folklore, reality and media
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-14-35
Abstract
How are oral histories about the past “selected” into tradition? In this article the mechanisms of this selection are discussed using in-depth interviews collected in 2000–2023. The topic of the stories is the Holocaust in the occupied part of the Soviet Union and the saving of Jews by other Soviet citizens. According to our hypothesis, stories that can gain a foothold in tradition may pass through some special “filters”. They must correspond to the worldview formed by Soviet, post-Soviet and Western media and ideology (in other words they need to fit into the social framework of memory of the Holocaust). They must also have an understandable and memorable structure similar to folk fables and memorates. In addition, when remembering the Holocaust people often talk about traumatic experiences and violence, so there is a specific way to talk about these complicated topics. Stories that do not pass through these “filters” usually cannot gain a foothold in tradition — so they may be told only by eyewitnesses. On the other hand, stories that have the features described above are being told not only among eyewitnesses of events, but also among young people. They become part of family memory and of local memory.
Keywords
About the Author
E. A. ZakrvskayaRussian Federation
Ekaterina Α. Zakrevskaya, Junior Researcher; Cand. Sci. Student, Centre for Typological and Semiotic Folklore Studies
119334, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, Bld. 32А
125047, Moscow, Miusskaya Sq., 6
References
1. Belova, O. V. (2012). Legendy o voine. Arkhetipy v sovremennykh fol’klornykh narrativakh [Folk legends about the war. Archetypes in modern folk stories]. In D. A. Redin (Ed.). Problemy istorii Rossii, Vol. 10: Istoricheskii istochnik i istoricheskii kontekst (pp. 227–235) (n. p.). (In Russian).
2. Belyanin S. V., & Zakrevskaya, E. A. (2022) “Ty budesh’ khleb brat’, a ia budu palkoi bit’”: sotsial’nye funktsii narrativov o maroderstve [“If you take the bread, I will beat you with a stick”: Social functions of narratives about looting]. Vestnik RGGU, Ser. Literaturovedenie. Iazykoznanie. Kul’turologiia, 2022(4, no. 2), 236–257. https://doi. org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-236-257. (In Russian).
3. Belyanin S. V., & Zakrevskaya, E. A. (2023) Kak istoriia stanovitsia fol’klorom: mekhanizmy fol’klorizatsii v rasskazakh o voine i Kholokoste [How history becomes folklore: Folklorization mechanisms of war and Holocaust stories]. Fol’klor: struktura, tipologiia, semiotika, 6(3), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-3-61-87. (In Russian).
4. Bernstein, S. (2019). Ambiguous homecoming: Retribution, exploitation and social tensions during repatriation to the USSR, 1944–1946. Past & Present, 242(1), 193–226.
5. Bit-Yunan, Yu. G. (2020). Roman V. S. Grossmana “Zhizn’ i sud’ba” v otsenke konservativnoi otechestvennoi kritiki 1980-kh gg. [V. Grossman’s novel “Life and Fate” reviewed by conservative Soviet critics in the 1980s] Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Literaturovedenie. Iazykoznanie. Kul’turologiia, 2020(6), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-6-12-25. (In Russian).
6. Bogatyrev, P. G., & Iakobson [= Jakobson], R. O. (1971). Fol’klor kak osobaia forma tvorchestva [Folklore as a specific form of creativity]. In P. G. Bogatyrev. Voprosy narodnogo tvorchestva (pp. 369–383). Iskusstvo. (In Russian).
7. Dymshits, V., & Begun, I. (Eds.) (1999). Gorskie evrei: Istoriia, etnografiia, kul’tura [Mountain Jews: History, ethnography, culture]. DAAT; Znanie. (In Russian).
8. Exeler, F. (2016). What did you do during the war? Personal responses to the aftermath of Nazi occupation. Kritika, 17(4), 805–835. https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2016.0050.
9. Gerasimova, I. (2016). Marsh zhizni. Kak spasali dolginovskikh evreev [March of life. How the Jews from Dolginovo were saved]. Corpus (AST). (In Russian).
10. Halbwachs, M. (1925). Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Librairie Félix Alcan.
11. Heimo, A., & Peltonen, U. M. (2017). Memories and histories, public and private: After the Finnish Civil War. In K. Hodgkin, & S. Radstone (Eds.). Memory, history, nation: Contested pasts (pp. 42–56). Routledge.
12. Koposov, N. (2011). Pamiat’ strogogo rezhima: Istoriia i politika v Rossii [Memory of a strict regime: History and politics in Russia]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
13. Kostyrchenko, G. V. (2012). Tainaia politika Khrushcheva: vlast’, intelligentsiia, evreiskii vopros [Khrushev’s secret policy: Power, Intelligentsia, Jewish question]. Mezhdunarodne otnosheniia. (In Russian).
14. Kostyrchenko, G. V. (2020) Tainaia politika: ot Brezhneva do Gorbacheva [The secret policy from Brezhnev to Gorbachev], Pt. 1: Vlast’ — Evreiskii vopros — Intelligentsiia [Power — Jewish question — Intelligentsia]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. (In Russian).
15. Levkievskaia, E. E. (1997). Narod bezmolvstvuet? Sovetskoe bogoborchestvo glazami russkogokrest’ianina [Are the people silent? Soviet theomachism through the eyes of a Russian peasant] Rodina, 1997(8), 96–101. (In Russian).
16. Levy, D., & Sznaider, N. (2002). Memory unbound: The Holocaust and the formation of cosmopolitan memory. Sage Publication.
17. Lord, A. B. (2000). The singer of tales. Harvard Univ. Press.
18. Lun’kova, E. S. (2020). Russko-belorusskie dialektnye sootvetstviia (na materiale smolenskikh, vitebskikh i mogilevskikh govorov) [Russian-Belarusian dialect correspondences (on the material of Smolensk, Vitebsk and Mogilev dialects)]. In A. F. Zhuravlev (Ed.). Issledovaniia po slavianskoi dialektologii (Vol. 21–22, pp. 35–56). (In Russian).
19. Mitsel’, M. (2007). Zapret na uvekovechenie pamiati kak sposob zamalchivaniia Kholokosta: praktika KPU v otnoshenii Bab’ego Iara [Ban on memorialization as a way to silence the memory of the Holocaust: The CPU practice of managing commemorative practices in Babi Yar]. Golokost i suchastnist’, 2007(1), 9–30. (In Russian).
20. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (2006). Ukazateli fol’klornykh siuzhetov i motivov: k voprosu o sovremennom sostoianii problemy [Indexes for motifs and types in folk stories today]. In A. V. Rafaeva (Ed.). Problemy strukturno-semanticheskikh ukazatelei (pp. 31–37). RGGU. (In Russian).
21. Rebrova, I. (2020). Re-constructing grassroots Holocaust memory: The case of the North Caucasus. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
22. Rozenblat, E. (2011). Spasenie evreev v Belarusi v gody Kholokosta: pravedniki i pravednye [Saving the Jews during the Holocaust: Righteous Among the Nations and the righteous]. In V. V. Mochalova (Ed.). Kholokost: novye issledovaniia i materialy: Materialy XVIII Mezhdunarodnoi ezhegodnoi konferentsii po iudaike (Vol. 4, pp. 69–86) (n. p.). (In Russian).
23. Rozenblat E., & Elenskaia, I. (2009) Pamiat’ o Kholokoste v Zapadnykh oblastiakh Belorussii [Memory about the Holocaust in the western regions of Belarus]. In O. V. Belova (Ed.). Istoriia — mif — fol’klor v evreiskoi i slavianskoi kul’turnoi traditsii (pp. 153–179) (n. p.). (In Russian).
24. Shternshis, A. (2017). When Sonia met Boris: An oral history of Jewish life under Stalin. Oxford Univ. Press.
25. Welzer, H. (2010). Re-narrations: How pasts change in conversational remembering. Memory Studies, 3(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698009348279.
26. Zakrevskaya, E. A. (2023). Fol’klornye modeli v ustnykh istoriiakh ob okkupatsii: stsenarii narrativizatsii i sposoby kombinatsii motivov [Folk models in stories about the occupation during the Great Patriotic War. Narrativization scenarios and he ways of combining motifs]. Fol’klor: struktura, tipologiia, semiotika, 6(2), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-2-69-96. (In Russian).
27. Zeltser, A. (2018). Unwelcome memory: Holocaust monuments in the Soviet Union. Yad Vashem.
28. Zombory, M. (2020). The anti-communist moment: competitive victimhood in European politics. Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest, 2020(2–3), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.3917/receo1.512.0021.
Review
For citations:
Zakrvskaya E.A. Oral stories about the rescue of Jews during the Holocaust: Folklore, reality and media. Shagi / Steps. 2024;10(3):14-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-14-35