Preview

Shagi / Steps

Advanced search

Co-design: Towards a new ecological paradigm in art and design

EDN: PXIQCR

Abstract

The article examines the rethinking of nature in contemporary art and design practices. Special attention is paid to the use of living organisms, which become a design tool and change the processes of production, agriculture, food culture, medicine, clothing, and energy sources. In numerous studies, design, done in conjunction with living organisms, has been identified as a new ecological paradigm that acts as a solution to the catastrophic consequences of the industrial revolution and modern production methods. In the academic field, the morphology of the new ecological paradigm has barely been formed. The paper analyzes an approach to art and design based on mimicry of nature, its imitation, and a biointegrated approach, using living materials and processes. It is concluded that both approaches are based on the same scientific method, which implies interdisciplinary design activities and collaboration between artists, designers, biologists and representatives of the respective scientific fields. Particular attention is paid to the description of terms with the prefix bio, such as biomorphism, biomimetics, biomimicry and bionics, which are part of the bio-inspired approach. We note the essential difference between biomimetics and biomimicry and the practice of biodesign, where living organisms are used as the main component of a product. Two ways of working with the living organism are highlighted: by choosing biological raw materials of plant, animal or microbial origin, and by the participation of the living component in the functioning of the product. Thus, the article shows how artists and designers within the new ecological paradigm work with living materials and attempt to move beyond a human-centered understanding towards design with nature. The conclusion identifies a number of challenges in scaling this practice and applying product prototypes to real-world production.

About the Author

O. V. Dyachenkova
HSE University
Russian Federation

Olga Viktorovna Dyachenkova, Post-Graduate Student, Doctoral School of Arts and Design, Faculty of Creative Industries

109028, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard, 11



References

1. Baikova, E. V. (2011). Biomorfizm kak sistema obraznogo modelirovaniia v kul’ture. [Biomorphism as a system of figurative modeling in culture] (Dr. Sci. (Culture Studies) Diss., Saratov State Technical University). (In Russian).

2. Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703260853.

3. Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. Harper Collins Publishers. Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1.

4. Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

5. Chayaamor-Heil, N., Houette, T., Demirci, Ö., & Badarnah, L. (2024). The potential of co-designing with living organisms: Towards a new ecological paradigm in architecture. Sustainability, 16(2), 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020673.

6. Fayemi, P. E., Maranzana, N., Aoussat, A., & Bersano, G. (2014). Bio-inspired design characterisation and its links with problem solving tools. In D. Marjanov, M. Storga, N. Pavkovic, & N. Bojcetic (Eds.). Proceedings of the 13th International Design Conference — Design 2014. May 19–22, 2014, Dubrovnik — Croatia (Vol. 1, pp. 173–182). Sveučilišna tiskara.

7. Fisch, M. (2017). The nature of biomimicry: Toward a novel technological culture. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(5), 795–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916689599.

8. Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144.

9. Fu, K., Moreno, D., Yang, M., & Wood, K. L. (2014). Bio-inspired design: An overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy. Journal of mechanical design, 136(11), 111102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028289.

10. Fuller, R. B., & Kuromiya, K. (1989). Critical path. St. Martin’s Griffin.

11. Haddon, A. С. (1914). Evolution in art: As illustrated by the life-histories of designs. Walter Scott.

12. Hayes, S., Desha C., & Baumeister, D. (2020). Learning from nature — biomimicry innovation to support infrastructure sustainability and resilience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120287.

13. Jacobs, S. (2014). Biomimetics: A simple foundation will lead to new insight about process. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 9(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V9-N2-83-94.

14. Karana, E., Barati, B., & Giaccardi, E. (2012). Living artefacts: Conceptualizing livingness as a material quality in everyday artefacts. International Journal of Design, 14(3), 37–53.

15. Migayrou, F. (2013). Naturalizing architecture. In M. A. Brayer & F. Migayrou (Eds.). Naturaliser l’architecture = Naturalizing architecture (pp. 38–59). HYX.

16. Myers, W. (2012). Bio design: Nature. Science. Creativity. Thames and Hudson.

17. Myers, W. (2022). Emerging bioart and biodesign (E-book, G. McDowall, R. Baaklini, & X. van der Eijk, Contributions). https://www.badaward.nl/assets/site/Emerging20Bioart202620Biodesign-gecomprimeerd.pdf.

18. Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Pantheon Books.

19. Pedersen Zari, M. (2019). Regenerative urban design and ecosystem biomimicry. Routledge.

20. Pohl, G., & Nachtigall, W. (2015). Biomimetics for architecture & design: Nature — analogies — technology. Springer.

21. Shukurova, A. N. (n. d.). “Iskusstva i remesla” [Arts & Crafts]. Bol’shaia rossiiskaia entsiklopediia. https://old.bigenc.ru/fine_art/text/2022363. (In Russian).

22. Smith, R. S. H., Bader, C., Sharma, S., Kolb, D., Tang, T. C., Hosny, A., Moser, F., Weaver, J. C., Voigt, C. A., & Oxman, N. (2020). Hybrid living materials: Digital design and fabrication of 3D multimaterial structures with programmable biohybrid surfaces. Advanced Functional Materials, 30(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201907401

23. Strizhak, A. V., & Kazakova N. Yu. (2020). K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii i ispol’zovanii termina “biomorfizm” [To the question of the origin and use of the term “biomorphism”]. Dizain i tekhnologii, 78 (no. 120), 14–21. (In Russian).

24. Williams, N., & Collet, C. (2020). Biodesign and the allure of “grow-made” textiles: An interview with Carole Collet. GeoHumanities, 7(1), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2020.1816141.


Review

For citations:


Dyachenkova O.V. Co-design: Towards a new ecological paradigm in art and design. Shagi / Steps. 2025;11(2):150-163. (In Russ.) EDN: PXIQCR

Views: 130


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-9410 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1765 (Online)