“Not a woman’s business”? On the problem of traditions and continuity of generations in Russian families of women scientists
EDN: EVZOSG
Abstract
The anthropology of the academic community is an understudied topic in Soviet women’s history. This article examines it and draws on published memoirs of female contemporaries, their oral histories (recorded by the author), and periodicals. The main working hypothesis is that traditions of academic life have been preserved from generation to generation and that features have developed that have formed stable traditions and unwritten rules observed by representatives of different generations of academic workers. The author analyzes details of the lifestyle of three generations of female academics in the USSR and Russia who achieved professional recognition and had highly cited publications. The first are women born in 1917–1949; the second are children of the postwar baby boom, born in 1950–1969; the third — those born during 1970–1999. Comparison of the attitude of female scientists to their own achievements in comparison with the success of their friends who did not become scientists, the life attitudes of the daughters of contemporary female scientists with the attitudes of older generations led to the conclusion about the need to correct the hypothesis. Working with memories, analyzing subjective assessments of successes and failures one can conclude that significant transformations in the motivations of female scientists in Russia are connected with the changes in the public life of the country and in everyday life practices over the past 70 years. High motivation, focus on self-sacrifice in the name of Science among older women has been replaced by strict rationality and much less sentimentality in their daughters.
Keywords
Soviet science,
women scientists,
academic everyday life,
women’s history,
anthropology of the scientific community,
everyday practices,
professional motivation
Supporting agencies: Supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 24-78-10005 “The Female Voice of Russian Science, 1800s–1980s”.
About the Author
N. L. Pushkareva
The Russian Academy of Sciences Miklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia Lvovna Pushkareva, Dr. Sci. (History) Chief Researcher, Head of the Center for Gender Studies
119334, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 32a
References
1. [Andreenkova, A. V.] (2009). Otchet “Sovremennoe pokolenie uchenykh: tsennosti, motivatsiia, stil’ zhizni” [Report “The modern generation of scientists: values, motivation, lifestyle”] (Center for Applied Research and Programs) (n. e.). http://www.inop.ru/files/5_2_2008_195.pdf. (In Russian).
2. Berdashkevich, A. P. (2000). Rossiiskaia nauka: sostoianie i perspektivy [Russian science: state and prospects]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2000(3), 118–123. (In Russian).
3. Berger, B. M. (Ed.) (1990). Authors of their own lives: Intellectual autobiographies by twenty American sociologists. Univ. of California Press.
4. Berger, B. M. (2000). Autobiographien: Soziologie der Soziologen. In P. Alhei, M. Andrews, & J. Behrens. Biographische Sozialisation (E. M. Hoerning, Ed.) (pp. 21–32). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110510348-003.
5. Bondarev, A. V. (2014). Vklad E. S. Markariana v stanovlenie otechestvennykh kul’turogeneticheskikh issledovanii [Contribution of E. S. Markaryan to the formation of domestic cultural genetic research]. In A. V. Bondarev (Ed.). Kul’turogenez i kul’turnoe nasledie (pp. 31–55). Tsentr gumanisticheskikh initsiativ. (In Russian).
6. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Stanford Univ. Press.
7. Bude, H. (1990). Das Altern einer Generation. Die Jahrgänge 1938–1948. Suhrkamp.
8. Burko, V. A., & Vasserman, Y. M. (2022). Modernizatsionnyi sindrom i doverie kak faktory dispozitsionnoi struktury: vzaimosviaz’ v aspekte mezhpokolennykh osobennostei [Modernization syndrome and trust: interrelation in the aspect of intergenerational characteristics]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2022(3), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250017388-9. (In Russian).
9. Dolgova, E. A., & Streltsova, E. A (2019). “Dobro pozhalovat’ v klub”: polozhenie zhenshchin v sovetskoi nauke 1920-kh godov [“Welcome to the club”: position of women in Soviet science in the 1920s]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2019(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250004014-8. (In Russian).
10. Komarova, G. A. (Ed.) (2013). Antropologiia akademicheskoi zhizni: traditsii i innovatsii [Anthropology of academic life: traditions and innovations]. IEA RAN. (In Russian).
11. Komarova, G. A. (2016). Antropologiia akademicheskoi zhizni: opyt integratsii nauk [Anthropology of academic life: experience of integration of sciences]. In G. A. Komarova (Ed.). Fenomen mezhdistsiplinarnosti v otechestvennoi etnologii (pp. 224–246). IEA RAN. (In Russian).
12. Marshak, A. L., & Rozhkova, L. V. (2015). Zhiznennyi uspekh v predstavleniiakh rossiiskoi molodezhi [Success in life in the views of Russian youth]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2015(8), 157–160. (In Russian).
13. Meshcherkina, E. (1996). Vvedenie v antologiiu muzhskoi zhizni [Introduction to the anthology of men’s life]. In V. Semenova, & E. Foteeva (Eds.). Sud’by liudei: Rossiia XX vek: Biografii semei kak ob’’ekt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia (pp. 298–325). Institut sotsiologii RAN. (In Russian).
14. Polyakova, V. V., & Chernovich, E. M. (2015). Chto rossiiane dumaiut o nauchnoi kar’ere? [What do Russians think about a scientific career?]. Informatsionnyi biulleten’ [of HSE University], 2015(1). https://issek.hse.ru/data/2015/04/22/1095478449/Отношение%20россиян%20к%20карьере%20в%20сфере%20науки.pdf. (In Russian).
15. Prokhorov, A. V. (2010). Sootnoshenie korporativnoi i akademicheskoi kul’tur v sovremennom universitete [Correlation of corporate and academic cultures of modern university] // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta, Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2010(10, no. (90)), 179–184. (In Russian).
16. Proskurina (Yavorovich), M. M. (2002). Feminizatsiia nauki kak sotsiologicheskaia problema [Feminization of science as a sociological problem]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2002(3), 72–76. (In Russian).
17. Pushkareva, N. L. (2006). Zhenshchiny-uchenye v rossiiskom postsovetskom fol’klore [Women scientists in Russian post-Soviet folklore]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2006(4), P. 39–59. (In Russian).
18. Pushkareva, N. L. (2012a). Zhenshchiny-istoriki v Rossii 1810–1917 gg. [Women-historians in Russia in 1810–1917]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriia, 2012(1, no. 18), 228–245. (In Russian).
19. Pushkareva, N. L. (2012b). Nauka — ne zhenskoe delo? K istorii feminizatsii rossiiskoi nauki v nachale XXI veka [Science is not a female business? To the history of the feminization of Russian science at the beginning of the 21st century]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Ser. Istoriia, 2012(2), 105–121. (In Russian).
20. Pushkareva, N. (2016). Kogda zarplaty byli bol’shimi: material’noe pooshchrenie sovetskikh uchenykh v 1921–1953 gg. [When salaries were really big: material incentives for Soviet scientists, 1921–1953]. Rossiiskaia istoriia, 2016(6), 69–83. (In Russian).
21. Pushkareva, N. L. (2021). Trud i otdykh zhenshchin-uchenykh v sovetskoi i postsovetskoi Rossii v otsenkakh ikh samikh [Work and leisure of women scholars in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia as assessed by themselves]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2021(3), 98–105. https:// doi.org/10.31857/S086954150015498-7. (In Russian).
22. Pushkareva, N. L., & Sekenova, O. I. (2020) “Zanimalas’ khoziaistvom”: domashnie pomoshchnitsy v povsednevnoi zhizni zhenshchin-istorikov pervoi poloviny XX v. [“Doing housework”: domestic workers in everyday life of women-historians of the 1st half of the 20th century]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriia, 2020(4, no. 51), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2020-4-5-15. (In Russian).
23. Saralieva, Z. Kh.-M., & Balabanov, S. S. (2002). Vosproizvodstvo nauchno-pedagogicheskikh kadrov: gendernyi aspect [Reproduction of scientific and pedagogical personnel: a gender aspect]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2002(11, no. 223), 110–119. (In Russian).
24. Shils, E. (1981). Tradition. Univ. of Chicago Press.
25. Temnitskiy, A. L. (2018). Tsennosti zhiznennogo uspekha i ikh voploshchenie u rabotaiushchego naseleniia Rossii [Life success values and their fulfillment for Russia’s working population]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 9(3), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2018.26.3.529. (In Russian).
26. Val’kova, O. A. (2012). Gosudarstvennaia politika v sfere professional’nogo nauchnogo truda zhenshchin v Rossii: konets XIX veka — 30-e gody XX veka [State policy in the field of professional scientific work of women in Russia: the end of the 19th century — the 30s of the 20th century]. In A. N. Dmitriev (Ed.). Raspisanie peremen: Ocherki istorii obrazovaniia i nauchnoi politiki v Rossiiskoi imperii — SSSR (pp. 809–848). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
27. Vasserman, Yu. M. (2004). Analiz sotsiokul’turnykh posledstvii modernizatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva (nekotorye rezul’taty pilotazhnogo issledovaniia) [Analysis of the sociocultural consequences of the modernization of Russian society (some results of a pilot study)]. In V. N. Stegnii (Ed.). Uchenye zapiski gumanitarnogo fakul’teta (Vol. 7, pp. 225–239). PGTU. (In Russian).
28. Vozmitel, A. A (2021). Ob’’ektivnye i sub’’ektivnye kharakteristiki uspekha postsovetskoi stolichnoi molodezhi [Objective and subjective characteristics of the success of post-Soviet youth]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 12(4), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2021.12.4.751. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Pushkareva N.L. “Not a woman’s business”? On the problem of traditions and continuity of generations in Russian families of women scientists. Shagi / Steps. 2025;11(2):76-92. (In Russ.) EDN: EVZOSG
Views:
75
Email this article 