From Lemmings in the Internet to New Valiant Protesters: Dysphemism shkolota and the representati on of adolescent participati on in the public sphere
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-163-184
Abstract
In the late 2010s, one can observe intensification of debates about adolescents as political subjects among the various Russian media platforms. Adolescents became an object of close attention of political actors and institutions, journalists, pop artists and ordinary internet users. This process is very noticeable in the shifts of semantics of the dysphemism shkolota (originally a disparaging definition of elementary and middle school students). The article aims to give an overview of the change in the meaning of shkolota as the «commonplace» of imagination and representation of teenagers. To find out what shkolota means, I conducted an analysis of publications and comments on LiveJournal, a social media platform and the birthplace of shkolota. A symbolic path was traced from the «Lemmings in the Internet» to «New Valiant Protesters» within twelve years. In considering the semantic boundaries and the context of shkolota in publications and comments on the LiveJournal platform and correlating them with the socio-political context of Russia, I describe the process of transformation of the dysphemism as a simultaneous expansion of adolescent participation visibility in the public sphere and the deconstruction of the image of the passive, defenseless (primarily against adult manipulation) and dangerous adolescent in public rhetoric. Analysis of how shkolota was reshaped turns out to be a method that allows us to consider from a new perspective the public rhetoric about children in contemporary Russia.
Keywords
About the Author
I. V. PrusRussian Federation
Irina V. Prus – MA Student, Department of Anthropology
191187, St. Petersburg, Gagarinskaya Str., 6/1, A
Тел.: +7 (812) 386-76-36
References
1. boyd, d. (2011). White flight in networked publics? How race and class shaped American teen engagement with MySpace and Facebook. In L. Nakamura, & P. A. Chow-White (Eds.). Race after the Internet (pp. 203–222). Routledge.
2. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Harvard Univ. Press.
3. Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2005). Reflections on youth, from the past to the postcolony. In F. De Boeck, & A. Honwana. (Eds.). Makers & Breakers: Children & Youth in Postcolonial Africa (pp. 19–30). Africa World Press.
4. Erpyleva, S. (2014a). “Na mitingi ia ne khodil, menia roditeli ne otpuskali”: vzroslenie, zavisimost’ i samostoiatel’nost’ v depolitizirovannom kontekste [“I didn’t go to rallies, my parents didn’t let me go”: Growing up, dependence and independence in a depoliticized context]. In S. Erpyleva, & A. Magun (Eds.). Politika apolitichnykh: Grazhdanskie dvizheniia v Rossii 2011–2013 godov (pp. 107–140). Novoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russian).
5. Erpyleva, S. (2014b). Protesty podrostkov v Rossii i Evrope: k voprosu o vospitanii politicheskoi samostoiatel’nosti v demokraticheskikh soobshchestvakh [Protests of teenagers in Russia and Europe: On the question of the education of political independence in democratic communities]. In M. Nozhenko, & E. Belokurova (Eds.). Sdelano v Evrope: vzgliad rossiiskikh issledovatelei (pp. 127–144). Norma. (In Russian).
6. Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming… Law & Society Review, 15(3 / 4), 631–654.
7. Fufaeva, I. (2018, June 5). Dobrota, milota, adminota, politota, ili Novaia zhizn’ starogo suffiksa [Dobrota, milota, adminota, politota or the New life of the old suffix]. Troitskii variant, 10. (In Russian).
8. Galiamina, Iu. E. (2015). Diskursivnaia bor’ba za vlast’: rol’ rechevykh etiketok [Discursive struggle for power: the role of verbal labels]. In A. S. Arkhipova, S. Iu. Nekliudov, D. S. Nikolaev, & N. N. Rychkova (Eds.). Antropologiia vlasti: fol’klornye teksty, sotsial’nye praktiki: Materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoi shkoly-konferentsii po fol’kloristike, sotsiolingvistike i kul’turnoi antropologii (pp. 224–225). RGGU. (In Russian).
9. Gornyi, E. (2009). Russkii LiveJournal: vliianie kul’turnoi identichnosti na razvitie virtual’nogo soobshchestva [Russian LiveJournal: The impact of cultural identity on the development of a virtual community]. In, N. Konradovа, K. Toibiner, & E. Shmidt (Eds.). Control + Shift: Publichnoe i lichnoe v russkom internete (pp. 109–130). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
10. Hemment, J. (2015). Youth politics in Putin’s Russia: Producing patriots and entrepreneurs. Indiana Univ. Press.
11. Howard, R. G. (2012). How counterculture helped put the “vernacular” in vernacular webs. In T. J. Blank (Ed.). Folk culture in the digital age: The emergent dynamics of human interaction (pp. 25–45). Utah State Univ. Press.
12. Kirchik, O. (2009). P’er Burd’e [Pierre Bourdieu]. In E. Kozievskaia, V. Kurennoi, & E. Iatsenko (Eds.). Mysliashchaia Rossiia: Istoriia i teoriia intelligentsii i intellektualov (pp. 314– 333). Avanti. (In Russian).
13. Kukulin, I. (2021). The culture of ban: Pop culture, social media and securitization of youth politics in today’s Russia. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(2), 177–190.
14. Kustarev, A. (2012). Sotsionimy: kreativnyi klass [Socionyms: The creative class]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2012(3), 3–10. (In Russian).
15. L’vovskii, S. (2010). Pod znakom iuvenal’noi iustitsii [Under the sign of juvenile justice]. Pro et Contra, 14(1–2), 20–41. (In Russian).
16. Miltner, K. M., & Gerrard, Y. (2022). “Tom had us all doing front-end web development”: a nostalgic (re)imagining of Myspace. Internet Histories, 6(1–2), 48–67.
17. Paisova, E., & Dement’eva, A. (2010). Khomiachki protestuiut, i eto khorosho [The hamsters are protesting, and that is good]. Iskusstvo kino, 2010(1), 16–21. (In Russian).
18. Radchenko, D., & Arkhipova, A. (2018). Ukrop i vatnik: “iazyk vrazhdy” rossiisko-ukrainskogo konflikta kak napadenie i zashchita [“Ukrop” and “vatnik”: “hate speech” of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict as an attack and defense]. Ab Imperio, 2018(1), 191–220. (In Russian).
19. Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science, 179(4070), 250–258.
20. Turkova, K. (Interviewer) (2021, January 28). Aleksandra Arkhipova: “Poslanie Naval’nogo doshlo do ochen’ mnogikh” [Navalny’s message reached a lot of people]. Golos Ameriki. https://www.golosameriki.com/a/arkhipova-poslaniye-navalnogo-doshlo-do-ochenmnogih/5754872.html. (In Russian).
21. Zhelnina, A. (2014). “Ia v eto ne lezu”: vospriiatie “lichnogo” i “obshchestvennogo” sredi rossiiskoi molodezhi nakanune vyborov [“I don’t get involved”: Perception of “personal” and “public” among Russian youth on the eve of elections]. In S. Erpyleva, & A. Magun (Eds.). Politika apolitichnykh: Grazhdanskie dvizheniia v Rossii 2011–2013 godov (pp. 143–180). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
22. Zhurzhenko, T. (2004). Staraia ideologiia novoi sem’i: demograficheskii natsionalizm Rossii i Ukrainy [The old ideology of the new family: Demographic nationalism of Russia and Ukraine]. In S. Ushakin (Ed.). Semeinye uzy: Modeli dlia sborki (pp. 268–296). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
23. Zhurzhenko, T. (2008). Gendernye rynki Ukrainy: Politicheskaia ekonomiia natsional’nogo stroitel’stva [Gendered markets of Ukraine: Political economy of nation-building]. EGU. (In Russian).
24. Zvereva, V. (2012). Setevye razgovory. Kul’turnye kommunikatsii v Runete [Net conversations: Cultural communication on Russian-speaking Internet]. Dept. of Foreign Languages, Univ. of Bergen. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Prus I.V. From Lemmings in the Internet to New Valiant Protesters: Dysphemism shkolota and the representati on of adolescent participati on in the public sphere. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(1):163-184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-163-184