Rançois Guizot vs Napoleon Bonaparte: Two “ heroes” of national history
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-2-171-186
Abstract
The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of two French politicians of the 19th century, François Guizot and Napoleon Bonaparte. At first glance, Guizot — a scholar-intellectual, a liberal, a convinced pacifist, a well-known historian and one of the most unpopular French politicians — is the complete opposite of Napoleon Bonaparte, one of the most controversial, but at the same time one of the most popular heroes of French history: an anti-liberal and authoritarian ruler, a general who tried to conquer Europe with fire and sword. However, a careful comparative analysis shows that they had a lot in common. Their destinies were inextricably linked with the Revolution, both of them attached great importance to educational policy, both understood the importance of the religious factor, and both stood at the origins of a united Europe, although they proposed to act in completely different ways. Both have had a very difficult historiographical fate. Guizot and Napoleon are also brought together by very contradictory assessments in historical science. The careers of both Napoleon and Guizot ended in a defeat. However, Guizot, a brilliant historian and pacifist, a theorist of the parliamentary regime, who tried to combine the idea of freedom with the idea of order, remained in history as an unpopular and unsuccessful minister. As for Napoleon, he triumphed even after his defeat. He may have won his most important battle, that is, the battle for historical memory. For all his ambiguity, Napoleon remains one of the main national heroes of France. These important questions are the focus of this article.
Keywords
François Guizot,
Napoleon Bonaparte,
comparative studies,
the French Revolution,
the First Empire,
the Restoration and the July Monarchy in France
Supporting agencies: The article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research programme.
About the Author
N. P. Tanshina
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliya P. Tanshina - Dr. Sci. (History), Professor, Department of General History, Institute of Social Sciences
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
Tel.: +7 (499) 956-99-99
References
1. Bovykin, D. Iu., & Chudinov, A. V. (2020). Frantsuzskaia revoliutsiia [The French Revolution]. Al’pina non-fikshn; PostNauka. (In Russian).
2. Branda, P. (2019, August 11). Napoléon, la naissance d’un mythe. La Nouvelle republique. https://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/a-la-une/napoleon-la-naissance-d-un-mythe. (In French).
3. Broglie, G. de. (1990). Guizot. Perrin. (In French).
4. Cabanel, P. (2012). Histoire des protestants en France (XVIe–XXIe siècle). Fayard. (In French). Chevallier, A. (2018). Napoléon sans Bonaparte. Les éditions du Cerf. (In French).
5. Grunberg, G. (2015). Napoléon Bonaparte. Le noir génie. CNRS Editions. (In French).
6. Gueniffey, P. (2017). Napoléon et de Gaulle. Deux héros français. Perrin. (In French). Hazareesingh, S. (2008). La légende de Napoléon. Tallandier. (In French).
7. Jourdan, А. (2004a). La Révolution, une exception française? Flammarion. (In French).
8. Jourdan, А. (2004b). Mythes et légendes de Napoleon. Un destin d’exception, entre rêve et réalité. Privat. (In French).
9. Kern, E. (2016). Napoléon. Deuх cents ans de légende. Histoire de la mémoire du Premier Empire. SOTECA. (In French).
10. Kozlov, S. (2013). Evoliutsiia frantsuzskoi obrazovatel’noi modeli v XIX veke [Evolution of the French educational model in the 19th century]. Otechestvennye zapiski, 2013(4), 60–84. (In Russian).
11. Lentz, T. (Ed.). (2005). Napoléon et l’Europe: regards sur une politique: actes du colloque organisé par la direction des Archives du ministère des Affaires éstrangères et la Fondation Napoléon, 18 et 19 novembre 2004. Fayard. (In French).
12. Lentz, T. (2015). Napoléon et la France. Vendémiaire Editions. (In French).
13. Malrauх, A. (1971). Les chênes qu’on abat. Gallimard. (In French).
14. Mastellone, S. (1957). La politique étrangère de Guizot. Revue d’histoire diplomatique 1957(4), 373–377. (In French).
15. Matveev, S. R. (2019). Svoboda i poriadok: liberal’nyi konservatizm Fransua Gizo [Freedom and order: The liberal conservatism of François Guizot]. Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. (In Russian).
16. Mauduit, Х. (2015). L’Homme qui voulait tout: Napoléon, faste et propagande. Autrement. (In French).
17. Poisson, G. (2004). L’aventure du retour des cendres. Tallandier. (In French).
18. Rémond, R. (1965). La vie politique en France depuis 1789. Vol. 1. 1789–1848. Colin. (In French).
19. Rosanvallon, P. (1985). Le moment Guizot. Gallimard. (In French).
20. Saint-Victoir, J. de. (2007). Les racines de la liberté. Le débat français oublié, 1689–1789. Perrin. (In French).
21. Sharl’, K. [= Charle, Ch.] (2005). Intellektualy vo Frantsii: vtoraia polovina XIX veka [Intellectuals in France: Second half of the 19th century]. Novoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russian).
22. Tanshina, N. P. (2015). Patsifistskaia ideia v postnapoleonovskoi Evrope: Fransua Gizo i Zhan-Zhak de Sellon [The pacifist idea in post-Napoleonic Europe: François Guizot and Jean-Jacques de Sellon]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, 2015(4), 157–172. (In Russian).
23. Tanshina, N. P. (2016). Fransua Gizo: Politicheskaia biografiia [François Guizot: Political biography]. MPGU. (In Russian).
24. Tanshina, N. P. (2021). Kniaginia Liven. Netitulovannaia koroleva evropeiskoi diplomatii [Princess Lieven. Untitled queen of European diplomacy]. Evraziia. (In Russian).
25. [Theis, L.] (2020). Entretien avec Laurent Theis: François Guizot, un libéral entre deux empires
26. (M. de Bruchard, Interviewer). Napoleon.com. https://www.napoleon.org/magazine/interviews/entretien-avec-laurent-theis-francois-guizot-un-liberal-entre-deux-empires/?fbclid=IwAR0HBn5GhFBtUxVV2Z2nmeCnWHvLzgzcyh4LkMIa12–BTE1ND0nx1sGwDnc. (In French).
27. Triomphe, P. (2002). L’Europe de François Guizot. Privat. (In French).
28. Tulare, J. (1978). Napoléon: ou, le mythe du sauveur. Fayard. (In French).
29. Vovelle, M. (Ed.) (1994). Révolution et République. L’exception française: actes du colloque de
30. Paris I, Sorbonne 21–26 septembre 1992. Éd. Kimé, 1994. (In French).
Review
For citations:
Tanshina N.P. Rançois Guizot vs Napoleon Bonaparte: Two “ heroes” of national history. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(2):171-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-2-171-186
Views:
56
Email this article 