The phenomenon of autohagiography: On the question of the replacement of subjectivity in Christian mysticism
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-94-116
Abstract
The article attempts to comprehend the phenomenon of religious consciousness. The aim is to describe, as an immanent experience, psychotechnics (work on oneself) — that which understands itself and describes itself in its own language with the help of metaphysical concepts. The introduction considers the so-called “Eulogy” of Moscow priest Alexei Mechev, previously analyzed by P. A. Florensky and V. N. Toporov. What is incomprehensible and intriguing about the “Eulogy” is that it is composed to himself and by himself in the most commendable way (and by no means in a humble tone, as one would expect) and essentially is a glorification of oneself as a saint. In parts I and II of the article, the same phenomenon is examined on the basis of works of 14thcentury German mystics: the autobiography “Vita” by the Constance mystic Heinrich Suso (1295/1297–1366) and the diary notes of the Zurich visionary Elsbeth von Oye (d. 1341/1342), which have survived in the original. In both the first and the second case, attention is paid to the phenomenon of double voicing, when statements endowed with performative power and devoid of any doubt about their complete, unconditional rightness are adjacent to the most derogatory and humble self-assessments. This is what the replacement of subjectivity looks like: as the human subjectivity of the charismatic is eliminated, the subjectivity of God, the divine “spark” unfolds in him: the emanation of God that is in him, which. however, is of another nature than the charismatic, in relation to which the charismatic himself acts as an instrument. Setting itself no limits, the imperative and categorical discovery of a “spark” in a humble charismatic corresponds to the glorification of oneself in Father A. Mechev’s “Eulogy”, which is emphasized in the Conclusion and explicated in several findings.
Keywords
About the Author
M. Yu. ReutinRussian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Reutin, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Leading Researcher, Center for Studies in History and Literature, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Institute for Social Sciences
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
Tel.: +7 (499) 956-96-47
References
1. Averintsev, S. S. (1977). Poetika rannevizantiiskoi literatury [Poetics of early Byzantine literature]. Nauka. (In Russian).
2. Beutin, W. (1997–1999). Anima. Untersuchungen zur Frauenmystik des Mittelalters (3 Vols.). Peter Lang. (In German).
3. Florenskii, P. (1997). Rassuzhdeniia na sluchai konchiny ottsa Alekseia Mecheva [Reflections on the death of Father Alexei Mechev]. In S. Fomin (Ed.). “Pastyr’ dobryi”: Zhizn’ i trudy moskovskogo startsa protoiereia Alekseia Mecheva (pp. 583–602). Palomnik; TUGA. (In Russian).
4. Hasebrink, B. (2008). Elsbeth von Oye: Offenbarungen (um 1340). In C. Herberichs, & C. Kiening (Eds.). Literarische Performativität. Lekturen vormoderner Texte (pp. 259–279). Chronos. (In German).
5. Ochsenbein, P. (1986). Die Offenbarungen Elsbeths von Oye als Dokument leidensfixierter Mystik. In K. Ruh (Ed.). Abendländische Mystik im Mittelalter. Symposion Kloster Engelberg 1984 (pp. 423–442). Metzler. (In German).
6. Reutin, M. Yu. (1996). Narodnaia kul’tura Germanii: pozdnee Srednevekov’e i Vozrozhdenie [German folk culture: Late Middle Ages and Renaissance]. RGGU. (In Russian).
7. Reutin, M. Yu. (2019). “Raspiataia vozliublennaia raspiatogo Syna”. Nemetskaia mistika pozdnego Srednevekov’ia (Ocherk traditsii) [“The crucified beloved of the crucified Son”. German mysticism of the late Middle Ages (Essay on tradition)]. In M. Yu. Reutin (Ed.). Elizabet Shtagel’. Zhitie sester obiteli Tess (pp. 339–463). Nauchno-izdatel’skii tsentr “Ladomir”; Nauka. (In Russian).
8. Reutin, M. Yu. (2020). Trikster Meletinskogo i srednevekovyi shut [Meletinsky’s Trickster and the medieval jester]. In A. V. Golubkov, I. V. Ershova, & K. A. Chekalov (Eds.). Ad virum illustrum: K 70-letiiu Mikhaila Leonidovicha Andreeva (pp. 704–725). Delo. (In Russian).
9. Ruhrberg, Chr. (1997). Verkörperte Theologie. Zum “Leben” der Сhristina von Stommeln. In A. Kuhn, & B. Lundt (Eds.). Lustgarten und Dämonenpein. Konzepte von Weiblichkeit in Mittelalter und früher Neuzeit (pp. 240–262). Edition Ebersbach. (In German).
10. Toporov, V. N. (1989). Meister Ekkhart-khudozhnik i “areopagiticheskoe” nasledstvo [Meister Eckhart the artist and “Areopagitic” heritage]. In V. P. Neroznak (Ed.). Paleobalkanistika i antichnost’ (pp. 219–252). Nauka. (In Russian).
11. Toporov, V. N. (2000). Ob odnom sluchae preodoleniia — opustosheniia svoego Ia: “Nadgrobnoe slovo ottsa Alekseia Mecheva” [On one case of overcoming-devastation of one’s I: “Eulogy of Father Alexei Mechev”]. In I. V. Stebleva (Ed.). “U vremeni v plenu”: Pamiati Sergeia Sergeevicha Tsel’nikera: Sbornik statei (pp. 148–180). Vostochnaia literatura. (In Russian).
12. Wünsche, Gr. (2008). Präseenz der Unerträglichen. Kulturelle Semantik des Schmerzes in den “Offenbarungen” Elsbeths von Oye (Inaugural Doctoral Diss., Faculty of Philology at the Albert Ludwig University). (In German).
Review
For citations:
Reutin M.Yu. The phenomenon of autohagiography: On the question of the replacement of subjectivity in Christian mysticism. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(4):94-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-94-116