Providence as history in Kleist’s prose (On a path to the realistic novella)
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-2-254-266
Abstract
Heinrich von Kleist’s novellas are characterized by a caleidoscopic alternation of the lands and the eras, where and when over and over again take place natural and (or) historical disasters. The heroes of these novellas, who find themselves in the sphere of such disasters, intuitively perceive providential intervention in their life and follow it in their behavior. In the novella “Michael Kohlhaas” (1808 / 1810) the land and the folk show themselves as the epically unified subject of national history, and the basis of the historical disasters are the irreversible social transformations. As for Providence, which shows itself as a chain of incidents, it becomes the symbolic sign of these transformations. This makes the narrator a hypostasis of the author’s figure. Unlike the narrator, this “author” can not only discern providential intervention in the described events but also can understand its historical underpinnings and dialectic. Together, the author, the narrator and “providential” history as their common subject are clearing the path to the realistic novella of the coming 19th century, when the social logic of life and of history was freed from the “providential” shell.
About the Author
A. I. Ivanitskiy
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander I. Ivanitskiy - Dr. Sci. (Philology) Leading Researcher, Institute for Higher Humanitarian Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities.
125047, GSP-3, Miusskaya Sq., 6
Tel.: +7 (495) 250-61-18
References
1. Клейст 1969 — Клейст Г. ф. Драмы. Новеллы / Пер. с нем. М.: Худ. лит., 1969.
2. Немецкая романтическая повесть 1935 — Немецкая романтическая повесть: В 2 т. / Под общ. ред. М. Лифшица. М.; Л.: Academia, 1935.
3. Belyi, Al. (2009). O Pushkine, Kleiste i nedopisannom “Dubrovskom” [About Pushkin, Kleist and unfinished “Dubrovskii”]. Novyi mir, 2009(11), 160–174. (In Russian).
4. Bent, M. I. (1999). A. S. Pushkin i G. fon Kleist: shest’ fragmentov k sravnitel’noi istorii literatury [Pushkin and H. von Kleist: Six fragments for a comparative history of the literature]. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo universiteta, Ser. Filologiia, 1999(1), 69–79. (In Russian).
5. Berkovskii, N. Ia. (2001). Romantizm v Germanii [Romanticism in Germany]. Azbuka-Klassika. (In Russian).
6. Dutoit, Th. (1994). Rape, Crypt and Fantasm: Kleist’s “Marquise of O…”. Mosaic, 27(3), 45–64.
7. Gaderer, R. (2011). “Michael Kohlhaas” (1808/10): Schriftverkehr — Bürokratie -- Querulanz. Zeitschrift fur deutsche Philologie, 130(4), 531–544. (In German).
8. Gurevich, A. Ia. (1989). Kul’tura i obshchestvo srednevekovoi Evropy glazami sovremennikov (Exempla XIII veka) [The culture and the society of Medieval Europe in the contemporaries perception]. Iskusstvo. (In Russian).
9. Hamacher, W. (1985). Das Beben der Darstellung. In D. E. Wellbery (Ed.). Positionen der Literaturwissenschaft: Acht Modellanalysen am Beispiel von Kleist “Das Erdbeben in Chili” (pp. 149–173). Beck. (In German).
10. Huff, St. (1982). Kleist and expectant virgins: The meaning of ‘O’ in “Die Marquise von O…”. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 81(3), 367–375.
11. Ivanitskii, A. I. (2019). Lokal’nye khronotopy v proze Genrikha fon Kleista — stseny promysla, roka i istorii [Local chronotopes in Heinrich von Kleist’s prose as scenes of providence, fate and history]. In N. E. Tropkina (Ed.). Vostok — Zapad: prostranstvo lokal’nogo teksta v literature i fol’klore: Sbornik nauchnykh statei k 70-letiiu professora A. Kh. Gol’denberga (pp. 350–357). Nauchnoe izdatel’stvo VGSPU “Peremena”. (In Russian).
12. Kittler, Fr. (1985). Ein Erdbeben in Chili und Preussen. In D. E. Wellbery (Ed.). Positionen der Literaturwissenschaft: Acht Modellanalysen am Beispiel von Kleist “Das Erdbeben in Chili” (pp. 24–38). Beck. (In German).
13. Koch, F. (1958). Heinrich von Kleist. Bewusstsein und Wirklichkeit. J. B. Metzler. (In German).
14. Kreutzer, H. J. (1989). “...aber niemand bedarf ihrer...” Hölderlin, Kleist, Arminius und die Zeitgeschichte. In B. Böschenstein, & G. Kurz (Eds.). Hoelderlin-Jahrbuch, 1988–1989, 60–73. J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). (In German).
15. Loch, R. (1978). Heinrich von Kleist: Leben und Werk. Reclam. (In German).
16. Maurer, K.-H. (2001). Gerechtigkeit zwischen Differenz und Identitaet in Heinrich von Kleists “Michael Kohlhaas”. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaften und Geistesgeschichte, 75(1), 123–144. (In German).
17. Meletinskii, E. M. (1990). Istoricheskaia poetika novelly [The historical poetics of the novella]. Nauka. (In Russian).
18. Mikhailov, A. V. (2000). Vvodnaia chast’ doklada “Genrikh fon Kleist i problemy romantizma” [The introductory part of the report “Heinrich von Kleist and the Problems of Romanticism”]. In A. V. Mikhailov. Obratnyi perevod. Russkaia i zapadnoevropeiskaia kul’tura: problemy vzaimosviazei (pp. 34–45). Iazyki russkoi kul’tury. (In Russian).
19. Pavlova, N. S. (2014). Ni klassik, ni romantik: Genrikh fon Kleist i ego stil’ [Neither Classic nor Romantic: Heinrich von Kleist and his style]. In E. E. Dmitrieva, A. V. Markina, & N. S. Pavlova (Eds.). Istoriia nemetskoi literatury. Novoe i noveishee vremia (pp. 463–474). Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet. (In Russian).
20. Schneider, H. J. (1985). Der Zusammensturz des Allgemeinen. In D. E. Wellbery (Ed.). Positionen der Literaturwissenschaft: Acht Modellanalysen am Beispiel von Kleists “Das Erdbeben in Chili” (pp. 110–129). Beck. (In German).
21. Serebriakov, A. A. (2007). Diskursivnye strategii v novelle Genrikha fon Kleista “Mikhael’ Kol’khaas” [Discursive strategies in Heinrich von Kleist’s novella “Michael Kohlhaas”]. In V. N. Skvortsov, & T. C. Mal’tseva (Eds.). Pushkinskie chteniia-2007: Materialy XII mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Pushkinskie chteniia” (6–7 iiunia 2007 g) (pp. 371– 378). LGU imeni A. S. Pushkina. (In Russian).
22. Stephens, A. (1999). Kleist — Sprache und Gewalt. Rombach, 1999. (In German).
23. Stierle, K.-H. (1985). Das Beben des Bewusstseins / Die narrative Struktur von Kleists ‘Das Erdbeben in Chili’. In D. E. Wellbery (Ed.). Positionen der Literaturwissenschaft: Acht Modellanalysen am Beispiel von Kleist “Das Erdbeben in Chili” (pp. 54–68). Beck. (In German).
24. Wichmann, Th. (1988). Heinrich von Kleist. J. B. Metzler. (In German).
Review
For citations:
Ivanitskiy A.I. Providence as history in Kleist’s prose (On a path to the realistic novella). Shagi / Steps. 2022;8(2):254-266. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-2-254-266
Views:
45
Email this article 