Projectional images in theatre: Modes of (media)presence
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-3-258-276
Abstract
The article examines the phenomenon of (media)presence as a projectional embodiment of objects in theatre. The aim is to describe techniques of using projectional surfaces and devices in performances, using as material Western European productions of the 2000s and 2010s. We attempt to identify and elucidate the modes of presence through the use of projectional images in theatre. The theoretical and methodological framework employed in the article includes a set of ideas at the intersection of theatre, visual, and media studies. Such a framework makes it possible to define performance as a visual event — the act of looking, and to shift the focus from technological artifacts to the processes of mediation of presence by projectional images. We introduce the concept of “(media) presence” as relevant for a productive description of the phenomenon. (Media)presence is the effect of being in the perceptual field of objects of perception, when their physical absence is compensated for by the presence of their screen substitutes. The use of projectional technologies in theatre allows one to achieve the effect of (media)presence through mediation of “life” performances. The ways in which directors utilize projectional surfaces and devices activate several modes of performative embodiment of perceptional objects through projectional images: “absent”, “composite” and “augmented” (media)presence. The text offers a complex analysis of practices of using projectional images in contemporary theatre aimed at achieving the effect of (media)presence.
Keywords
projectional images,
projectional technologies in theatre,
screen,
mediated performances,
media tools in theatre,
presence,
liveness,
spectacularity,
embodiment
Supporting agencies: The investigation presents and improves ideas, first proposed in the master’s thesis “Modes of (Media)Presence in Contemporary Theatre”, defended by the author of the article at the NRU HSE in 2021.
About the Author
P. V. Baulina
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Polina V. Baulina - MA in Cultural Studies PhD Student, Doсtoral School of Arts and Design, Faculty of Communications, Media and Design
115054, Moscow, Malaya Pionerskaya Str., 12
Tel.: +7 (495) 621-87-11
References
1. Auslander, Ph. (1999). Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. Routledge.
2. Auslander, Ph. (2012). Digital liveness: A historico-philosophical perspective. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, 34(3), 3–11.
3. Belting, H. (2005). Image, body, medium: A new approach to iconology. Critical Inquiry, 31(2), 302–319.
4. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. A. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
5. Causey, M. (2006). Theatre and performance in digital culture: From simulation to embeddedness. Routledge.
6. Dixon, S. (2007). Digital performance: A history of new media in theater, dance, performance art, and installation. MIT Press.
7. Couldry, N. (2004). Liveness, “reality”, and the mediated habitus from television to the mobile phone. The Communication Review, 7(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490886952.
8. Fischer-Lichte, E. (2004). Ästhetik des Performativen. Suhrkamp. (In German).
9. Fischer-Lichte, E (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics (S. I. Jain, Trans.). Routledge.
10. Fischer-Lichte, E. (2012). Appearing as embodied mind — defining a weak, a strong and a radical concept of presence. In G. Giannachi, N. Kaye, & M. Shanks (Eds.). Archaeologies of presence (pp. 103–118). Routledge.
11. Frosh, P. (2012). Indifferent looks: Visual inattention and the composition of strangers. In G. Rose (Ed.). Visuality / materiality: Images, objects and practices (pp. 171–190). Routledge.
12. Frosh, P. (2019). The poetics of digital media. Polity.
13. Giannachi, G. (2004). Virtual theatres: An introduction. Routledge.
14. Lehmann, H. (2005). Postdramatisches Theater (New ed., reprint. ed.). Verlag der Autoren.
15. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x.
16. Noё, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Harvard Univ. Press.
17. Oliszewski, A., Fine, D., & Roth, D. (2018). Digital media, projection design, and technology for theatre. Routledge.
18. Sermon, P., Dixon, S., Popat Taylor, S., Packer, R., & Gill, S. (2021). A Telepresence Stage: Or how to create theatre in a pandemic — project report. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 18(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2021.2015562.
Review
For citations:
Baulina P.V. Projectional images in theatre: Modes of (media)presence. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(3):258-276. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-3-258-276
Views:
68
Email this article 