On a dramaturgical marginalium of the 1920s
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-3-238-257
Abstract
The paper analyzes anonymous handwritten corrections in a copy of a propagandist play, “Darkness” (T’ma, 1927), by T. M. Martynov. The author suggests that the anonymous editor worked in the Nizhny Novgorod Krai’s Department of Public Education (Nizhkraiono), which was responsible for overseeing theatrical work. The author distinguishes factographic, stylistic and ideological emendations. The latter include the elimination of derogatory remarks about the main character (a peasant woman) in the speech of positive characters, as well as a radical change in the ending. In the new version, the heroine’s husband does not abandon her, but only threatens to do so unless she learns to read and write, and asks the village healers for help. The author concludes that the handwritten corrections corresponded to two key tenets of the epoch. According to the first one, the peasants were not as responsible for their ignorance as was the “old regime”, and thus their misdeeds deserved indulgence (this idea, in particular, was reflected in so called agitation trials). On the other hand, criticism of the backwardness of the Soviet countryside should be accompanied by demonstration of the peasantry’s transition to a new life; this idea can be observed in numerous guides for sel’kors (‘village correspondents’). Therefore, the corrections to the play smoothed out the critical angles of the original play and suggested its approximation to the current ideological attitudes.
Keywords
propagandist theatre,
agitation trials,
1920s,
literacy propaganda,
village correspondents,
elimination of illiteracy
Supporting agencies: The article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research programme.
About the Author
M. V. Akhmetova
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria V. Akhmetova - Cand. Sci. (Philology) Senior Researcher, Center for Theoretical Folklore Studies, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
Tel.: +7 (499) 956-96-47
References
1. Amangel’dyeva, T. A. (2006). Liubimtsy v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny [Residents of Lyubim town in the years of the Great Patriotic War] (n. s.) (quoted from the site of the Lyubimsky Museum of Local Lore). http://lubim-muzey.ru/index.php/biblioteka/bibliotekamuzeya-4/329-amangeldyeva-t-a-lyubimtsy-v-gody-velikoj-otechestvennoj-vojny. (In Russian).
2. Blok, V. B., & Shul’pin, A. P. (2000). Samodeiatel’nyi teatr na rubezhe 20–30-kh godov. Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiia. TRAMy [Amateur theatre on the border of the 1920s and 1930s: Main trends of its development. TRAMs]. In S. Iu. Rumiantsev, A. L. Sokol’skaia, & L. P. Solntseva (Eds.). Samodeiatel’noe khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo v SSSR: Ocherki istorii: 1917–1932 gg. (pp. 143–169). Dmitrii Bulanin. (In Russian).
3. Fitzpatrick, Sh. (1979). Education and social mobility in the Soviet Union: 1921–1934. Cambridge Univ. Press.
4. Fomenko, A. Iu. (Ed.) (2019). Ustav i otchety Pereslavl’-Zalesskogo nauchno-prosvetitel’nogo obshchestva [Rules and resolutions of the Pereslavl-Zalessky Scientific and Educational Society]. MelanarE. (In Russian).
5. Grafova, M. (2021). “Babii bunt” v sovetskoi agitatsionnoi literature 1920-kh godov [“The country wives’ revolt” in Soviet agitational literature of the 1920s]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2021(5), 94–110. (In Russian).
6. Ivanov, K. I. (2004). Fabrika “Krasnoe ekho”: 1849–1949 gg. [‘Red Echo’ factory: 1849–1949]. Pereslavskii sovet VOOPiK. (In Russian).
7. Khodiakov, M. V. (2019). Den’gi revoliutsii i Grazhdanskoi voiny: 1917–1920 gody [Money of the Revolution and the Civil War: 1917–1920] (3rd ed.). Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
8. Khoroshkin, Ia. M. (2011). Tvorcheskii Nizhnii: k istorii stanovleniia i razvitiia tvorcheskikh organizatsii. 1918–1939 gg.: Sbornik dokumentov [The artistic Nizhny: On the history of establishment and development of artistic organizations. 1918–1939: Collection of documents]. Komitet po delam arkhivov Nizhegorodskoi oblasti. (In Russian).
9. Kostiakova, Iu. B. (2012). Rabochie i sel’skie korrespondenty: otsenka s pozitsii intelligentovedeniia (na materialakh Khakasii i Gornogo Altaia) [Worker and rural correspondents: Estimation from the positions of intelligentsia studies (based on materials of Khakassia and Mountain Altay]. Intelligentsiia i mir, 2012(3), 60–78. (In Russian).
10. Markasova, E. V. (2002). Sud’ba sel’kora: sotsial’naia mobil’nost’ v kontekste samovospriiatiia (1924–1931 gg.) [Rural correspondent’s fate: Social mobility in the context of self-perception (1924–1931)]. In S. Iu. Malysheva (Ed.). Povsednevnost’ rossiiskoi provintsii: istoriia, iazyk i prostranstvo: Materialy 3-i Vserossiiskoi letnei shkoly “Provintsial’naia kul’tura Rossii: podkhody i metody izucheniia istorii povsednevnosti”. Kazan’, iiun’-iiul’ 2002 g. (pp. 210–226) (n. p.). (In Russian).
11. Maslinskaia (Leont’eva), S. G. (2012). “Po-pionerski zhil, po-pionerski pokhoronen”: materialy k istorii grazhdanskikh pokhoron v SSSR [“Lived as a pioneer, buried as a pioneer”: Materials towards the history of civil funerals in the USSR]. Zhivaia starina, 2012(3), 49–52. (In Russian).
12. Pankrat, I. A. (2022). Osobennosti vnutrennei evoliutsii politiki likvidatsii bezgramotnosti v 1920-e gody [The features of the internal evolution of the elimination of illiteracy policy in the 1920s]. Skif: Voprosy studencheskoi nauki, 2022(1), 349–358. (In Russian).
13. Selishchev, A. M. (2003). Iazyk revoliutsionnoi epokhi. Iz nabliudenii nad russkim iazykom (1917–1926) [Language of the revolutionary epoch. From the observations on the Russian language (1917–1926)] (2nd ed., ster.; 1st ed.: 1928). URSS. (In Russian).
14. Shtamm, S. I. (1985). Upravlenie narodnym obrazovaniem v SSSR (1917–1936 gg.) (Istorikopravovoe issledovanie) [Management of public education in the USSR (1917–1936) (A historical and legal study)]. Nauka. (In Russian).
15. Shul’pin, A. P. (2000a). Krasnoarmeiskii i raboche-krest’ianskii teatr perioda grazhdanskoi voiny i voennogo kommunizma [Red Army and workers’-peasants’ theatre of the period of the Civil War and War Communism]. In S. Iu. Rumiantsev, A. L. Sokol’skaia, & L. P. Solntseva (Eds.). Samodeiatel’noe khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo v SSSR: Ocherki istorii: 1917–1932 gg. (pp. 64–97). Dmitrii Bulanin. (In Russian).
16. Shul’pin, A. P. (2000b). Samodeiatel’nyi teatr 20-kh godov [Amateur theatre of the 1920s]. In S. Iu. Rumiantsev, A. L. Sokol’skaia, & L. P. Solntseva (Eds.). Samodeiatel’noe khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo v SSSR: Ocherki istorii: 1917–1932 gg. (pp. 98–142). Dmitrii Bulanin. (In Russian).
17. Sidorchuk, I. V. (2021). Agitsudy kak forma agitatsionno-propagandistskoi raboty v 1920-e gg. [Agitation courts as a form of agitation and propaganda work in the 1920s]. Izvestiia Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Ser. Istoricheskie nauki i arkheologiia, 2021(5), 35–40. (In Russian).
18. Vasekha, M. V. (2018). “Krest’ianka gramotnaia”: likbez v Zapadnoi Sibiri i konstruirovanie novogo patterna zhenskogo povedeniia v 1920-e gody [“Peasant literacy”: Education program in Western Siberia and the construction of a new pattern of female behavior in the 1920’s]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Ser. Istoriia, filologiia, 17(5), 150– 160. (In Russian).
19. Vud [= Wood], E. (2020). Gender i voobrazhenie v period Grazhdanskoi voiny v Rossii: otstalye zhenshchiny i peredovye muzhchiny v ikonograficheskoi perspektive, 1917–1922 gg. [Gender and imagination in the period of the Civil War in Russia: Backward women and advanced men in iconographic perspective, 1917–1922]. In T. A. Abrosimova et al. (Eds.). Grazhdanskaia voina v Rossii: Zhizn’ v epokhu sotsial’nykh eksperimentov i voennykh ispytanii, 1917–1922: Materialy mezhdunarodnogo kollokviuma (Sankt-Peterburg, 10–13 iiunia 2019 g.) (pp. 223–237). Nestor-Istoriia. (In Russian).
20. Wood, E. A. (2005). Performing justice: Agitation trials in early Soviet Russia. Cornell Univ. Press.
Review
For citations:
Akhmetova M.V. On a dramaturgical marginalium of the 1920s. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(3):238-257. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-3-238-257
Views:
62
Email this article 