Tyrannical power of the bishop and social space: The case of Mérida in the late 6^th century

The article focuses on the figure of an evil bishop in the “Lives of the Fathers of Merida” in the context of the image of a tyrant. The figures of the king and the bishop, on the one hand, and the tyrant and the bad bishop, on the other, are shown to be interconnected. The rhetoric associated with the image of a tyrant reflects the connection of the bad bishop to demonic forces, his fundamental alienness from the Christian community through being a member of corpus Antichristi. This results in his destroying the community (ciuitas) entrusted to him: it becomes subject to disturbances, famine, and disease. Ciuitas is understood as a sacralized social space, organized in accordance with the ideal divine order: Therefore, any action that profaned it was an act of tyranny. In turn, the true bishop set the unity of all elements of the Christian community, whose harmony and well-being depended on maintaining the order of the sacred. The key constituents of the ciuitas thus understood were churches and relics, the integration of which was ensured by the bishop. In the “Lives of the Fathers of Merida” attempts to seize these objects and attacks against the head of the community are depicted as the main tyrannical activities precisely because they disturb the functioning of the sacred space of the ciuitas.

1. Angenendt, A. (1982). Rex et Sacerdos: zur Genese der Königssalbung. In N. Kamp, & J. Wollasch (Eds.). Tradition als historische Kraft (pp. 100–118). De Gruyter.

2. Arce, J. (1999). The City of Mérida (Emerita) in the Vitas Patrum Emeritensium (VIth century A. D.). In E. Chrysos, & I. Wood (Eds.). East and West: Modes of communication (pp. 1–14). Brill.

3. Aurov, O. V. (2010a). Vestgotskie koroli-ariane posle epokhi Iordana (kharakter, ideologiia i simvolika vlasti) [Visigothic kings-Arians after Jordanes’ era (character, ideology and symbolism of power)]. Vspomogatel’nye istoricheskie distsipliny, 31, 73–103. (In Russian).

4. Aurov, O. V. (2010b). “Gladio vindice Leuuigildi”: korol’-reformator pered litsom pamiati [“Gladio vindice Leuuigildi”: The Great King in the context of memory]. Vestnik RGGU, Ser. Istoricheskie nauki. Vseobshchaia istoriia, 2010(18(61)/10), 33–50. (In Russian).

5. Aurov, O. V. (2017a). “Istoriia Vamby” Iuliana Toledskogo i problema pravovoi zashchity korolevskoi vlasti ot uzurpatsii [Julian of Toledo’s “Historia Wambae Regis” and the problem of the legal protection of royal power against usurpation]. In O. V. Aurov, & E. S. Marei (Eds.). Teologiia i politika. Vlast’, Tserkov’ i tekst v korolevstvakh vestgotov (V — nachalo VIII vv.): Issledovaniia i perevody (pp. 99–128). Izdatel’skii dom “Delo”. (In Russian).

6. Aurov, O. V. (2017b). O varvarskom i rimskom v kharaktere korolevskoi vlasti u vestgotov (V — seredina VI veka) [Barbarian and Roman elements in the character of Visigothic royal power (5th — mid-6th century)]. In O. V. Aurov, & E. S. Marei (Eds.). Teologiia i politika. Vlast’, Tserkov’ i tekst v korolevstvakh vestgotov (V — nachalo VIII vv.): Issledovaniia i perevody (pp. 25–75). Izdatel’skii dom “Delo”. (In Russian).

7. Aurov, O. V. (2019a). Ispaniia v epokhu vestgotov. Kratkaia istoriia. [Spain of the Visigothic epoch: A short history]. Evraziia. (In Russian).

8. Aurov, O. V. (2019). Korolevskaia vlast’ v Toledskom korolevstve vestgotov (konets VI — nachalo VIII v.) [Royal power in the Visigothic kingdom of Toledo (late 6th century to early 8th century)]. In A. V. Anashkin et al. (Eds.). Monarkh i monarkhiia: K 150-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia imperatora Nikolaia II i 100-letiiu ubieniia tsarskoi sem’i (pp. 34–51). Izdatel’stvo Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. (In Russian).

9. Barbero de Aguilera, A. B. (1970). El pensamiento político visigodo y las primeras unciones regias en la Europa medieval. Hispania: Revista española de historia, 30(115), 245–326.

10. Beatrice, P. F. (2005). On the meaning of “profane” in the pagan-Christian conflict of Late Antiquity: The Fathers, Firmicus Maternus and Porphyry before the Orphic “Prorrhesis” (OF 245.1 Kern). Illinois Classical Studies, 30, 137–165.

11. Belayche, N. (2007). Des lieux pour le “profane” dans l’Empire tardo-antique? Les fêtes entre koinônia sociale et espaces de rivalités religieuses. Antiquité tardive, 15, 35–46.

12. Berger, A. (1953). Encyclopedic dictionary of Roman law. American Philosophical Society. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.

13. Birkin, M. Yu. (2020a). Durnoi episkop kak tiran v “Sententsiiakh” Isidora Sevil’skogo [Evil bishop as tyrant in Isidore of Seville’s Sententiae]. Shagi / Steps, 6(2), 259–291. (In Russian).

14. Birkin, M. Yu. (2020b). Episkop v vestgotskoi Ispanii [The bishop in Visigothic Spain]. Nauka. (In Russian).

15. Bourgain, P. (2020). Prologue-Le lexique du profane et du sacré au Moyen Âge. In C. Heid, M. Deramaix, & O. Pédeflous (Eds.). Le profane et le sacré dans l’Europe latine. V–XVI siècles (pp. 15–25). Classiques Garnier.

16. Brennan, B. (1992). The image of the Merovingian bishop in the poetry of Venantius Fortunatus. Journal of Medieval History, 10(1), 115–139.

17. Brown, P. (1981). The cult of the saints: Its rise and function in Latin Christianity. Univ. of Chicago Press.

18. Canning, J. (2014). A history of medieval political thought: 300–1450. Routledge.

19. Castellanos, S. (1996a). Conflictos entre la autoridad y el “hombre santo”: hacia el control oficial del patronatus caelestis en la Hispania Visigoda. Brocar: Cuadernos de investigación histórica, 20, 77–90. (In Spanish).

20. Castellanos, S. (1996). Las reliquias de santos y su papel social: cohesión comunitaria y control episcopal en Hispania (ss. V–VII). POLIS: Revista de ideas y formas políticas de la Antigüedad, 8, 5–21. (In Spanish).

21. Castellanos, S. (2003). The significance of social unanimity in a Visigothic hagiography: Keys to an ideological screen. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 11(3), 387–419.

22. Castellanos, S. (2018). Política y registro hagiográfico en la Hispania visigoda: Leovigildo en

23. las Vitae. In P. Castillo Pascual, & P. Iguácel de la Cruz (Eds.). Studia Historica in Honorem Prof. Urbano Espinosa Ruiz (pp. 485–499). Universidad de La Rioja. (In Spanish).

24. Castillo Lozano, J. Á. (2019). Categorías de poder en el reino visigodo de Toledo: los tiranos en las obras de Juan de Bíclaro, Isidoro de Sevilla y Julián de Toledo. Universidad de Murcia. (In Spanish).

25. Castillo Lozano, J. Á. (2020). Luchas de poder en la Mérida visigoda. Intus — legere: historia, 14(2), 104–123.

26. Chartier, R. (1990). Les origines culturelles de la Révolution française. Editions du Seuil. (In French).

27. Codoñer Merino, C. (Trans., Ed.) (1992). Isidoro de Sevilla. Diferencias. Libro I. Belles Lettres. (In Spanish).

28. Collins, R. (1980). Mérida and Toledo: 550–585. In E. James (Ed.) Visigothic Spain: New approaches (pp. 189–219). Clarendon Press.

29. Craig, C. (2004). Audience expectations, invective, and proof. In J. Powell, & J. Paterson (Eds.). Cicero the advocate (pp. 187–213). Oxford Univ. Press.

30. De Souza, M. (2010). Repousser les profanes: les progrès du militantisme religieux d’après les sources latines de Virgile à Augustin. In É. Rebillard, & C. Sotinel (Eds.). Les frontières du profane dans l’Antiquité tardive (pp. 55–71). École française de Rome.

31. Díaz, P. C. (1997). La rue à Merida au VIe siècle: usage sacré et usage profane. In A. Leménorel, & A. Corbin (Eds.). La rue, lieu de sociabilité: Rencontres de la rue. Actes du colloque de Rouen, 16–19 novembre 1994 (pp. 331–340). Publications de l’Université de Rouen.

32. Díaz, P. C. (2000). City and territory in Hispania in Late Antiquity. In G.P. Brogiolo, N. Gauthier, & N. Christie (Eds.). Towns and their territories between Late Antiquity and the Early Middles Ages (pp. 3–35). Brill.

33. Díaz, P. C. (2010). Mérida tardoantica: l’apoteosi di una città cristiana. Reti Medievali Rivista, 11(2), 67–79.

34. Díaz y Díaz, M. C. (1975). La trasmisión de los textos antiguos en la peninsula iberica en los siglos VII–XI. Settimne di Studio del Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 22, 133–178. Presso la sede del Centro.

35. Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse Univ. Press

36. Dumézil, B. (2014). Le modèle royal à l’époque mérovingienne. In M. Gaillard (Ed.).

37. L’empreinte chrétienne en Gaule, du IVe au IXe siècle (pp. 131–147). Brepols. (In French).

38. Dunkle, J. R. (1967). The Greek tyrant and Roman political invective of the late republic. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 98, 151–171.

39. Escribano, V. E. (1997). La ilegitimidad politica en los textos historiográficos y jurídicos tardios (Historia Augusta, Orosius, Codex Theodosianus). Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité, 44, 85–120.

40. Ewig, E. (1965). Zum christlichen Königsgedanken im Frühmittelalter. Vorträge und Forschungen, 3 (2nd ed.), 7–73. (In German).

41. Fear, A. T. (Ed.) (1997). Lives of the Visigothic fathers. Liverpool Univ. Press.

42. Flower, R. (2013). Emperors and bishops in late Roman invective. Cambridge Univ. Press.

43. Frighetto, R. (1999). Um protótipo de pseudo-sacerdos na obra de Valério do Bierzo: O caso de Justus (Ordo Querimoniae, 6). Arys: Antigüedad: religiones y sociedades, 2, 407–418. (In Spanish).

44. Gaddis, M. (2005). There is no crime for those who have Christ: Religious violence in the Christian Roman Empire. Univ. of California Press.

45. García Moreno, L. A. (1974). Prosopografía del reino visigodo de Toledo. Universidad de Salamanca. García Moreno, L. A. (1989). História de España visigoda. Catedra. (In Spanish).

46. Hibst, P. (1990). Gemeiner Nutzen: Begriffsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur politischen Theorie vom 5. vorchristlichen bis zum 15. nachchristlichen Jahrhundert. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 33, 60–95. (In German).

47. Howe, T. (2007). Vandalen, Barbaren und Arianer bei Victor von Vita. Verlag Antike. (In German).

48. Kantorowicz, E. H. (1946). Laudes regiae: A study in liturgical acclamations and mediaeval ruler worship. Univ. of California Press.

49. King, P. D. (1972). Law and society in the Visigothic kingdom. Cambridge Univ. Press.

50. King, P. D. (1988). The Barbarian kingdoms. In J. H. Burns (Ed.). The Cambridge history of Medieval political thought c. 350 — c. 1450 (pp. 123–154). Cambridge Univ. Press.

51. Klingshirn, W. E. (2003). Isidore of Seville’s taxonomy of magicians and diviners. Traditio, 58, 59–90.

52. Kulikowski, M. (2004). Late Roman Spain and its cities. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

53. Lester, M. (2019). Persecutio, seductio, and the limits of rhetorical intolerance in Visigothic Iberia.

54. In É. Fournier, & W. Mayer (Eds.) Heirs of Roman Persecution (pp. 213–229). Routledge.

55. Lunn-Rockliffe, S. (2007). Ambrosiaster’s political theology. Oxford Univ. Press.

56. Maranesi, A. (2018). An Emperor for all seasons — Maximian and the transformation of his political representation. In D. W. P. Burgersdijk, & A. J. Ross (Eds.). Imagining Emperors in the Later Roman Empire (pp. 63–82). Brill.

57. Marei, E. S. (2014) Entsiklopedist, bogoslov, iurist: Isidor Sevil’skii i ego predstavlenie o prave i pravosudii [An encyclopedist, theologian and jurist: Isidore of Seville and his ideas on law and justice]. Universitet Dmitriia Pozharskogo. (In Russian).

58. Markus, R. A. (1985). The sacred and the secular: From Augustine to Gregory the Great. The Journal of Theological Studies, 36(1), 84–96.

59. Markus, R. A. (1990). The end of ancient Christianity. Cambridge Univ. Press.

60. Markus, R. (2016). Between Marrou and Brown: transformations of late antique Christianity.

61. In Ph. Rousseau, & M. Papoutsakis (Eds.). Transformations of Late Antiquity (pp. 1–13). Routledge.

62. Martín, J. C. (1997). Caracterización de personajes y tópicos del género hagiográfico en el Vita Desiderii de Sisebuto. Helmantica: Revista de filología clásica y hebrea, 48(145), 111–133.

63. Mateos Cruz, P. (2000). Augusta Emerita, de capital de la Diocesis Hispaniarum a sede temporal visigoda. Memorias de la Real Academia de Buenas Letras de Barcelona, 25, 491–520.

64. Maya, A. (1994). De Leovigildo perseguidor y Masona mártir. Emérita, 62(1), 167–186. (In Spanish).

65. Mülke, M. (2016). Guter König und doch Verfolger? Die Religionspolitik des Westgotenkönigs Leovigild im Urteil der zeitgenössischen Historiker (Johannes Biclarensis und Isidor von Sevilla). Frühmittelalterliche Studien, 50(1), 99–128. (In German).

66. Musurillo, H. (Intro., Texts, Trans.) (1972). The acts of the Christian martyrs. Clarendon Press. Opelt, I. (1965). Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen. Eine Typologie. C. Winter. (In German).

67. Opelt, I. (1973). Hilarius von Poitiers als Polemiker. Vigiliae Christianae, 27(3), 203–217. (In German).

68. Orlandis, J. (1959). En torno a la noción visigoda de tiranía. Anuario de historia del derecho español, 29, 5–43. (In Spanish).

69. Orlandis, J. (1992). Semblanzas visigodas. Rialp. (In Spanish).

70. Osland, D. K. (2011). Urban change in Late Antique Hispania: The case of Augusta Emerita (Ph D. Diss., Univ. of Cincinnati).

71. Pérez Sánchez, D. (2009). La idea del “buen gobierno” y las virtudes de los monarcas del reino visigodo de Toledo. Mainake, 31, 217–227.

72. Reydellet, M. (1981). La royauté dans la littérature latine de Sidoine Apollinaire à Isidore de Séville. École Française de Rome. (In French).

73. Shkarenkov, P. P. (2009). Latinskaia ritoricheskaia traditsiia na rubezhe antichnosti i Srednevekov’ia: problemy istochnikovedcheskogo izucheniia [Latin rhetorical tradition in the times of transition from Antiquity to the Middle Ages: Problems of source studies]. Vestnik RGGU, Ser. Istoricheskie nauki. Istoriografiia, istochnikovedenie, metody istoricheskikh issledovanii, 2009(4(9)), 146–161. (In Russian).

74. Stachura, M. (2007). Kritik der superstitio und Affirmation der Orthodoxie in den Gesetzen des Codex Theodosianus. Electrum, 12, 33–61. (In German).

75. Stachura, M. (2018). Enemies of the later Roman order: A study of the phenomenon of language aggression in the Theodosian Code, post-Theodosian Novels, and the Sirmondian Constitutions. Jagiellonian Univ. Press.

76. Staubach, N. (1984). ‘Cultus divinus’ und karolingische Reform. Frühmittelalterliche Studien, 18, 546–581.

77. Stevenson, T. (2009) Antony as ‘tyrant’ in Cicero’s First Philippic. Ramus: Critical studies in Greek and Roman literature, 38(2), 174–186.

78. Teillet, S. (2011). Des Goths à la nation gothique. Les origines de l’idée de nation en Occident du Ve au VIIe siècle (2nd ed.). Les Belles Lettres. (In French).

79. Thompson, E. A. (1969). The Goths in Spain. Clarendon Press.

80. Ullmann, W (1965). The growth of Papal government in the Middle Ages. A study in the ideological relation of clerical to lay power. Methuen.

81. Velázquez, I. (Ed., Trans. and Notes) (2008). Vidas de los Santos Padres de Merida. Editorial Trotta. (In Spanish).

82. Welchering, P. (1984). PROFAN: Materialien zur Geschichte eines wenig beachteten und erforschten Begriffs. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 28, 63–99.