Alone in the theatre: The phenomenon of a performance for a single spectator

The situation when the viewer finds himself alone with the performer or with another kind of actor (performative space, technological object, etc.) is used more and more frequently in unconventional theatrical projects. The conditions of the game vary, but the principle of the spectator’s loneliness obviously influences the theatrical plot. What’s going on with the plot? What happens to the viewer when he is fully responsible for the result of the performance? The article examines performances for a single spectator, created in the field of installation theater and theater of objects, where the situation of a sole viewer intensifies the viewer’s experience without depriving him of subjectivity. Participatory productions, where a single spectator comes into close contact with the performer, are also analyzed in detail. In Russia, the spread of such experiences is associated with the pandemic that provoked the development of digital theater. The performances, establishing oneon-one contact with the audience, worked with a situation of permanent involvement outside a real communication, with a situation of anxiety and loneliness. Possessing a therapeutic value, such projects also inevitably objectify the viewer, since in an extremely concentrated situation of the absence of someone other than the performer and the viewer, he is deprived of the opportunity to control the gaze directed at him from the outside.

1. Aronson, A. (2018). The history and theory of environmental scenography. Methuen Drama.

2. Gardner, L. (2009, August, 11). How intimate theatre won our hearts. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2009/aug/11/intimate-theatre-edinburgh.

3. Grois [= Groys], B. (2007). Genealogiia partitsipativnogo iskusstva [Geneology of participatory art]. Moskovskii khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, 67–68. http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/25/article/394. (In Russian).

4. Grois [= Groys], B. (2010). O territorii, materii, plemenakh, klassovoi bor’be i inykh slozhnostiakh... [About territory, substance, tribes, class fight and other weirdness] (V. Miziano, Interviewer). Moskovskii khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, 111. http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/100/article/2215. (In Russian).

5. Iampolski, M. (2019). Izobrazhenie: Kurs lektsii [Image: Lecture series]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

6. Kleiman, Y. (2019). Running in circles: The Homo Novus Festival 2018 in Riga. Theatre and Performance Design, 5(3–4), 296–309.

7. Kleiman, Y. Spontannaia programma festivalia “Tochka dostupa”: onlain proekty kak opyt vzaimodeistviia [Spontaneous program of “The Access Point Festival” as an experience of interaction]. In A. Yerkebay, E. Jafarov, & L. Chkhartishvili (Eds.). Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi distantsionnoi nauchnoi konferentsii “TEATR ONLINE”. 11 Maia 2020 = Materials of the International scientific online conference “THEATRE ONLINE”. 11 May 2020 (pp. 77– 80). International Union of Theatre Critics. (In Russian).

8. McLuhan, H. M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw Hill.

9. Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L’Être et le néant: Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Gallimard. (In French).

10. Schechner, R. (1994). Environmental theatre. Applause Books.

11. Zerihan, R. (2009). Introduction. In R. Zerihan (Ed.). One to one performance (pp. 3–7). Live Art Development Agency.