Between intervention and sharing: On the relationship of performances in public spaces to the milieu

The article deals with performances in public space and their ways of interaction with the milieu. Based on interviews with directors and some audience members, it analyses the theatre actors’ perception of the milieu and discursive strategies for describing theatre’s penetration into urban space. The author analyses the performances To eat Rostov by Elina Kulikova, premiered during the Transformation festival in Rostov, Attentifs, ensemble by Ici-même, Paris, D’ici on voit la tour Eiffel by Deuxième groupe d’intervention, Malakoff, and the perception failures that occurred during those shows noted either by the audience or by the directors. Examination of these failures reveals some regularities of theatre in public space. First, the performance in situ disturbs the everyday life of the place and can lead to a conflict between the users of space and theatrical actors, who proceed to appropriate space and contest the codes and practices that exist in it, a conflict that is related to the objectification process. Second, the in situ performance can immerse the audience into space and reveal the problems contained therein through the incorporation of acting scenes, whereas the presence of external monitors, such as the police, in the view of the audience impedes the immersion. Third, a performance in situ can become a platform for communication with citizens and serve to valorise everyday routines, including itineraries in non-staged, out-of-centre locations.

1. Ardenne, P. (2002). Un art contextuel. Flammarion. (In French).

2. Aronson, A. (2019). Teatr v real’nom prostranstve v vek tsifrovoi real’nosti [Theatre in a real space in the age of digital reality]. Stsena, 2019(6(122)), 70–72. (In Russian).

3. Arsen’ev, P. (2017). Teatr nastoiashchego vremeni: Remote X kak vymysel deistviia [The theatre of the present tense: Remote X as a fiction of action]. In A. Grinshteyn (Ed.). Igra. Tekst. Kul’tura: Nauchnyi sbornik (Vol. 3. pp. 103–114). Laboratoriia semiotiki kul’tury Samarskoi gosudarstvennoi oblastnoi akademii (Naianovoi). (In Russian).

4. Avanessian, A., & Hennig, A. (2012). Präsens: Poetik eines Tempus. Diaphanes. (In German).

5. Baecke, A. de. (2019). Une histoire de la marche. Perrin. (In French).

6. Cerkvenik Bren, V. (2019). Why don’t we do it in the road. A personal guide to outdoor interactive theatre. Kulturno umetnisko drustvo Ljud.

7. Certeau, M. (1990). L’invention du quotidien, (Vol. 1) Arts de faire. Gallimard. (In French).

8. Chaudoir, Ph. (2000). Discours et figures de l’espace public à travers les “Arts de la Rue”. La ville en scènes. L’Harmattan. (In French).

9. Citton, Y. (2014). Pour une écologie de l’attention. Seuil. (In French).

10. Clifford, J. (1986). On ethnographic allegory. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.). Writing culture (pp. 98–121). Univ. of California Press.

11. Delfour, J. (1997). Rue et théatre de rue: habitation de l’espace urbain et spectacle théatral. Espaces et sociétés, 1997(2(No. 90)), 145–166. (In French).

12. Drouin, E. (2008). La rue, le plus court chemin entre soi et les autres? Etudes théâtrales, 1–2 (No. 41–42), (165–170. (In French).

13. Drouin, E., & Guyomarc’h, J. (2018). Structure du spectacle vivant dans l’espace public: Deuxième Groupe d’intervention. Les cahiers de la LCD, HS1 (Hors-série N° 1), 156–166. (In French).

14. Escorne, M. (2015). L’art à même la ville. Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux. (In French).

15. Fix, F. (Ed.) (2018). Théâtre et ville. Espaces partagés: patrimoine, culture, savoir. Editions Universitaires de Dijon. (In French).

16. Formis, B. (2010). Esthétique de la vie ordinaire. Presses Universitaires de France. (In French).

17. Gaber, F. (2009). Comment ça commença. Les arts de la rue dans le contexte des années 70. Ici et là. (In French).

18. Genette, G. (1972). Discours du récit. In G. Genette. Figures III (pp. 65–278). Seuil. (In French).

19. Gonon, A. (2011). In vivo. Les figures du spectateur des arts de la rue. L’Entretemps. (In French).

20. Gordienko, E. I. (2017). Spektakli in situ: dokumental’noe prostranstvo igry [Site-specific theatre: The documentary space of the performance]. Shagi/Steps, 3(3), 81–96. (In Russian).

21. Gordienko, E. I. (2020). Neprofessionaly na professional’noĭ stsene: estetika obydennogo v sovremennom teatre i tantse [Non-professionals on the professional stage: aesthetics of the ordinary in contemporary theatre and dance]. Praktiki i interpretatsii, 5(1), 82–99. (In Russian).

22. Kaye, N. (2000). Site-specific art: Performance, place and documentation. Routledge.

23. Kleiman, Y. (2018). St. Petersburg: a site-specific stage. Theatre and Performance Design, 4(3), 261–279.

24. Lakоff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Univ. of Chicago Press.

25. Lee H.-K. (2013). Les arts de la rue en France: une logique de double jeu. L’Harmattan. (In French).

26. Lefebvre, H. (2000). La production de l’espace (4th ed.). Editions Economica. (In French).

27. Lefkowitz, M. (2015). Walk, Hands, Eyes (a city). Les laboratoires d’Aubervilliers, les Beaux Arts de Paris.

28. MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603.

29. Maleval, M., & Lachaud, J.-M. (2015). Rue des arts: Productions artistiques et espace urbain. L’Harmattan. (In French).

30. Mil’rud, R. P., & Kondakova, N. N. (2005). Teorii oshibok v metodike obucheniia inostrannomu iazyku [Theories of mistakes in the methodics of foreign language teaching]. Psikhologopedagogicheskii zhurnal “Gaudeamus”, 7, 128–134. (In Russian).

31. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.

32. Ostrowetsky, S. (1997). La rue et la thébaide. Espaces et sociétés, 1997(2(No. 90)), 139–144. (In French).

33. Ousmanova, A. (2013). Ot khudozhestvennogo aktsionizma k performativnoi politike: iskusstvo i publichnaia sfera [From artistic actionism to performative politics: art and public sphere]. In E. R. Iarskaia-Smirnova, & P. V. Romanov (Eds.). Publichnaia sfera: Teoriia, metodologiia, keis stadi [Public sphere: Theory, methodology, case studies] (pp. 125–149). OOO “Variant”; TsSPGI. (In Russian).

34. Sklez, V. (2013). Vosstanovlennaia spravedlivost’: dokumental’nyi teatr kak sud nad istoriei [Righting wrongs: Documentary theatre as history’s trial]. Artikul’t, 2013(3(11)), 24–31. (In Russian).

35. Uchitel’, K. A. (2020). Genii mesta: opyty vzaimodeistviia: Tezisy i nabliudeniia [Genius loci: interaction experiences: Theses and observations]. Teatr. Zhivopis’. Kino. Muzyka, 2020(2), 141–155. (In Russian).