Preview

Shagi / Steps

Advanced search

The art of the storyteller: «Mystical» and «rational» aspects

https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2025-11-1-17-39

Abstract

An epic storyteller is an individual who has devoted his life to performing heroic-epic tales in front of fellow villagers or other audiences. There are many stories about how a prospective storyteller acquires his creative abilities. This acquisition basically comes in two varieties. The first type is a «mythological» one. A person receives his poetic gift in a mystical way, either voluntarily or by supernatural compulsion, which can be called «storyteller’s initiation» (by analogy with shamanic initiation). As a rule, it happens when the future narrator is a child or an adolescent, and it happens without witnesses (the boy / young man is looking after cattle, after a strong thunderstorm, in a dream, etc.). The «patron of initiation» is almost always a representative of another world, often the spirit of the hero who is celebrated in the epic. The process of acquiring the «gift» usually coincides with mystical reception of the texts themselves in their verbal and musical form. Any attempt to refuse the «gift» brings misfortune and illness. The second type is a «realistic» one. A person is interested in songs and tales from childhood, memorizes them and tries to repeat them. Having gained approval, he becomes an apprentice to a renowned storyteller (singer, musician), observes the master’s work, adopts his skills and techniques, memorizes the repertoire, learns to control his voice and handle an instrument. In addition to practical significance, «apprenticeship» can have a symbolic function. Often, only the passage through such a «school» gives a novice storyteller the right to perform in front of an audience, for which he is blessed by his mentor, who also acts as a «patron of initiation». If the otherworldly character performs an «introductory» initiation, endowing the storyteller with the gift of poetry, the mentor completes the «initiation» by granting permission to perform (sometimes it can be done by another authoritative person). Thus, there are direct correspondences between these two types, there is a certain common model based on the first (i. e. «mythological») type of «storyteller’s initiation».

About the Authors

S. Yu. Nekliudov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Sergey Yurievich Nekliudov, Dr. Sci. (Philology), Professor Chief Researcher, Center for Theoretical
Folklore Studies, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Institute for Social Sciences; Professor, Centre for Typological and Semiotic Folklore Studies

119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82;

125993, GSP-3, Moscow, Miusskaya Sq., 6



Bamao Daiji
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Daiji Bamao, Postgraduate Student (2017–2019), Centre for Typological and Semiotic Folklore Studies

125993, GSP-3, Moscow, Miusskaya Sq., 6



References

1. Bogatyrev, P. G. (1971). Aktivno-kollektivnye, passivno-kollektivnye, produktivnye i neproduktivnye etnograficheskie fakty [Active-collective, passive-collective, productive and unproductive ethnographic facts]. In P. G. Bogatyrev. Voprosy teorii narodnogo iskusstva (pp. 384–386). Iskusstvo. (In Russian).

2. Daiji Bamao (2019). Sovremennaia epicheskaia traditsiia Tibeta: skazitel’, tekst, praktiki [Modern epic tradition of Tibet: storyteller, text, practices] (Research paper on qualifying work (Dissertation), Russian State University for the Humanities). (In Russian).

3. Dikyi Palmo [= Daiji Bamao] (2014). Sovremennye ispolniteli tibetskogo eposa "Lin-Gesar" … (polevye issledovaniia leta 2013 goda) [Contemporary Tibetan performers of the epic "Ling Gesar" (Fieldwork summer 2013)]. In I. V. Kul’ganek et al. (Eds.). MongolicaXII (pp. 43–54). Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie. (In Russian).

4. Funk, D. A. (2005). Miry shamanov i skazitelei: Kompleksnoe issledovanie teleutskikh i

5. shorskikh materialov [Worlds of shamans and storytellers: A comprehensive study of Teleut and Shor materials]. Nauka. (In Russian).

6. Hatto, A. Τ. (1970). Shamanism and epic poetry in Northern Asia. Univ. of London (School of Oriental and African Studies).

7. Heissig, W. (1967). Tibet und die Mongolei als literarische Provinzen. In W. Shulemann. Die Kunst Zentralasiens als Ausdrucksform religiösen Denkens, & W. Heissig. Tibet und die Mongolei als literarische Provinzen (pp. 105–135). Westdeutscher Verlag.

8. Katashev, S. M. (1997). Altaiskii geroicheskii epos [Altai heroic epic]. In Altaiskie geroicheskie skazaniia: Ochi-Bala. Kan-Altyn (pp. 11–46). (In Russian).

9. Meletinskii, E. M., Nekliudov, S. Yu., & Novik, E. S. (2021). Istoricheskaia poetika fol’klora: ot arkhaiki k klassike [Historical poetics of folklore: from archaic to classical]. RGGU. (In Russian).

10. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (1975). [On field research in Dundgobi Province, Mongolia]. Sovetskaia etnografiia, 1975(3), 148–149. (In Russian).

11. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (1977). [On field research in Dundgobi Province, Mongolia]. Sovetskaia etnografiia, 1977(1), 148–149. (In Russian).

12. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (2003). Zvuchashchee slovo v fol’klore [The spoken word in folklore]. In Viach. Vs. Ivanov (Ed.). Evraziiskoe prostranstvo: Zvuk, slovo, obraz (pp. 108–119). Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury. (In Russian).

13. Nekliudov, S. Yu. (2019). Fol’klornyi landshaft Mongolii: Epos knizhnyi i ustnyi [Folklore landscape of Mongolia: Book and oral epic]. Indrik. (In Russian).

14. Nekliudov, S. Yu., & Dikyi [= Daiji] Bamao (2021). “Prizvanie pevtsa” kak model’ skazitel’skoi initsiatsii: tibetskaia versiia [“The singer’s calling” as a model of storytelling initiation: Tibetan version]. In N. S. Petrova (Ed.). Fol’klor i antropologiia professii: Materialy XXI Mezhdunarodnoi shkoly po fol’kloristike i kul’turnoi antropologii (pp. 5–6). RANKhiGS; RGGU. (In Russian).

15. Nekliudov, S. Yu., & Riftin, B. L. (1976). Novye materialy po mongol’skomu fol’kloru [New materials on Mongolian folklore]. Narody Azii i Afriki, 1976(2), 135–147. (In Russian).

16. Putilov, B. N. (1997). Epicheskoe skazitel’stvo: Tipologiia i etnicheskaia spetsifika [Epic storytelling: Typology and ethnic specificity]. Izdatel’skaia firma “Vostochnaia literatura”. (In Russian).

17. Rakhmatullin, K. A. (1968). Tvorchestvo manaschi [Creativity of manaschi]. In S. Musaev (Ed.). “Manas”: geroicheskii epos kirgizskogo naroda (pp. 75–147). Ilim. (In Russian).

18. Stein, R.-A. (1959). Recherches sur l’épopée et le barde au Tibet. Presses Universitaires de France.

19. Yusha, Zh. M. (2018). Fol’klor i obriad tuvintsev Kitaia v nachale XXI veka: Struktura. Semantika. Pragmatika [Folklore and ritual of Tuvans of China at the beginning of the 21st century: Structure. Semantics. Pragmatics]. Nauka. (In Russian).

20. Zhirmunskii, V. M. (2004). Legenda o prizvanii pevtsa [Legend of the singer’s calling]. In V. M. Zhirmunskii. Fol’klor Zapada i Vostoka: Sravnitel’no-istoricheskie ocherki (B. S. Dolgin, & S. Yu. Nekliudov, Eds.) (pp. 397–407). OGI. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Nekliudov S.Yu., Daiji B. The art of the storyteller: «Mystical» and «rational» aspects. Shagi / Steps. 2025;11(1):17-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2025-11-1-17-39

Views: 140


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-9410 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1765 (Online)