Fantasies of being somebody: Auto / biographic potential of posing conventions
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-268-285
Abstract
The article examines the tension between the individual and the collective in current mainstream photographic practice, which is considered within the long-term historical context of commercial portraiture. The individualizing tendencies of this representational tradition as well as its status as (auto)biographical fiction were astutely analyzed by the Russian avant-garde thinkers Alexander Rodchenko and Osip Brik. Criticizing the persistence of “painterly” clichés in studio photography of their time, they saw these conventional elements as something that obscures and distorts reality, substituting for it a beautiful picture. For these leftist theorists, reality was primarily defined by the interplay of social forces, and isolating the subject within the picture frame was sufficient grounds for their disapproval. Taking up their notion of cliché applied particularly to posing, this article proposes to view it, instead, as an entry point into the usually invisible collective dimension of each individual portrait. The first section of the article discusses historical precedents to current mainstream photographic portraiture in terms of class- and gender-specific pressures on the sitters which have contributed to the homogenization of the genre’s visual canon. The suggestion to view stylistically similar images of individuals as expressing a latent collectivity is developed in the second part of the article, which analyzes Jana Romanova’s photographic series W through the theoretical framework borrowed from Lauren Berlant (“intimate public”, “female complaint”) and Gayle Letherby (“auto/biography”).
About the Author
K. O. Gusarova
Russian State University for the Humanities; The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ksenia O. Gusarova, Cand. Sci. (Cultural Studies), Senior Researcher, Institute for the Advanced Studies in the Humanities; Associate Professor, Department of Cultural Studies and Social Communication
GSP-3, 125993, Moscow, Miusskaya Sq., 6
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
Tel.: +7 (499) 250-66-68
Tel.: +7 (499) 956-99-99
References
1. Annanurova, O. (2018). (Im)possible to try: Notes on Soviet fashion photography. Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture, 22(2), 187–198.
2. Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida (R. Howard, Trans.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
3. Barthes, R. (1990). The fashion system (M. Ward, & R. Howard, Trans.). Univ. of California Press.
4. Barthes, R. (2002). Société, imagination, publicité. In R. Barthes. Œuvres complètes (Vol. 3, pp. 60–72). Seuil. (In French).
5. Berger, H. (1994). Fictions of the pose: Facing the gaze of early modern portraiture. Representations, 46, 87–120.
6. Berger, H. (2000). Fictions of the pose: Rembrandt against the Italian Renaissance. Stanford Univ. Press.
7. Berlant, L. (2008). The female complaint: The unfinished business of sentimentality in American culture. Duke Univ. Press.
8. Campany, D. (2006). Posing, acting, photography. In D. Green, & J. Lowry (Eds.). Stillness and time: Photography and the moving image (pp. 97–112). Univ. of Brighton.
9. De Perthuis, K., & Findlay, R. (2019). How fashion travels: The fashionable ideal in the age of Instagram. Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture, 23(2), 219–242.
10. Gavrishina, O. (2011). “Snimaiutsia u fotografa”: rezhimy tela v sovetskoi studiinoi fotografii [“Having their picture taken”: Bodily regimes in Soviet studio photography]. In O. Gavrishina. Imperiia sveta: fotografiia kak vizual’naia praktika epokhi “sovremennosti” (pp. 31–43). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
11. Gilmore, L. (1994). Autobiographics: A feminist theory of women’s self-representation. London: Cornell Univ. Press
12. Jay, P. (1994). Posing: Autobiography and the subject of photography. In K. M. Ashley, L. Gilmore, & G. Peters. (Eds.). Autobiography and Postmodernism (pp. 191–211). The Univ. of Massachusetts Press.
13. Jones, A. (2002). The “eternal return”: Self-portrait photography as a technology of embodiment. Signs, 27(4), 947–978.
14. Lacan, J. (2005). The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In J. Lacan. Écrits: A selection (pp. 1–6) (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Routledge. (1st ed.: 1949).
15. Lejeune, Ph. (2009). On diary (K. Durnin, Trans.). Univ. of Hawai’i Press.
16. Letherby, G. (2014). Feminist auto/biography. In M. Evans et al. (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of feminist theory (pp. 45–60). SAGE.
17. Marcus, L. (2018). Autobiography: A very short introduction. Oxford Univ. Press.
18. Orlova, G. (2019). The samples of post-Soviet posing. Practices & Interpretations: A Journal of Philology, Teaching and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 53–70.
19. Rocamora, A. (2013). How new are new media? The case of fashion blogs. In Dj. Bartlett, Sh. Cole, & A. Rocamora (Eds.). Fashion media: Past and present (pp. 155–164). Bloomsbury.
20. Simon, R. (1987). The portrait in Britain and America. Phaidon.
21. Smith, S., & Watson, J. (1998). Women, autobiography, theory: A reader. Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
22. Sontag, S. (2001). On photography. Picador. (1st ed.: 1973).
23. Spicer, J. (1991). The Renaissance elbow. In J. Bremmer, & H. Roodenburg (Eds.). A cultural history of gesture: From antiquity to the present day (pp. 84–128). Polity Press.
24. Wissinger, E. (2015). This year’s model: Fashion, media, and the making of glamour. New York Univ. Press.
Review
For citations:
Gusarova K.O. Fantasies of being somebody: Auto / biographic potential of posing conventions. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(4):268-285. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-268-285
Views:
55
Email this article 