Preview

Shagi / Steps

Advanced search

Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?

https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-117-134

Abstract

The article examines a type of “autobiographical sadness” — the author’s feelings associated with the creation and publication of books. Varied manifestations of self-reflection and emotions are found in texts of the autobibliographic genre, which flourished in the era of humanism and early printing. The synthesisof bibliography and biography, which had Greek and Roman prototypes and was characteristic, among others, of humanist handbooks in bibliography, contributed to the explicit expression of the authorial “self” in such seemingly technical, dry and “objective” works. The very structure of these handbooks implied the inclusion of an article about its compiler in the text. In this article, two examples of such texts are analyzed — namely, the autobibliographies by the Swiss polymath Conrad Gessner and by the English clergyman and historian John Bale. Written only three years apart (in 1545 and 1548, respectively), they nevertheless differ significantly, in both the organization of the biographical narrative and in the nature of book presentation. The article shows that the peculiarity of these texts is largely due to differences in the self-identification and self-presentation of their authors. While for Bale the acquisition of the true faith and confessional polemics were of fundamental importance, Gessner, though also a Protestant, places his own formation as a humanist author and interaction with book publishers in the focus of the story.

About the Author

M. L. Sergeev
S. I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg Branch; National Library of Russia
Russian Federation

Mikhail L. Sergeev, Cand. Sci. (Philology), Researcher; Senior Researcher

199034, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya Emb., 5 B

191069, St. Petersburg, Sadovaya Str., 18

Tel.: +7 (812) 328-47-12

Tel.: +7 (812) 310-83-36



References

1. Arnold, K. (1993). “De viris illustribus”. Aus den Anfängen der humanistischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung. Johannes Trithemius und andere Schriftstellerkataloge des 15. Jahrhunderts. Humanistica Lovaniensia, 42, 52–70. (In German).

2. Beyer, J., & Penman, L. T. I. (2013). Printed autobibliographies from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. In M. Walsby, & N. Constantinidou (Eds.). Documenting the early modern book world: Inventories and catalogues in manuscript and print (pp. 161–184). Brill.

3. Blair, A. (2010). Too much to know: Managing scholarly information before the Modern Age. Yale Univ. Press.

4. Blair, A., & Patton, M. (2021). A quantitative study of the paratexts in Erasmus-Froben imprints. Erasmus Studies, 41(2), 99–181.

5. Bloemendal, J., & Nellen, H. J. M. (2014). Philology: Editions and editorial practices in the Early Modern period. In Ph. Ford, J. Bloemendal, & Ch. Fantazzi (Eds.). Brill’s encyclopaedia of the Neo-Latin world (pp. 185–206). Brill.

6. Cavallo, G., & Chartier, R. (Eds.). (2001). Histoire de la lecture dans le monde occidental. Seuil. (In French).

7. Eisenstein, E. L. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformation in early modern Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press.

8. Enenkel, K. (2022). “Identities” in humanist autobiographies and related self-presentations. In K. Scholten et al. (Eds.). Memory and identity in the learned world: Community formation in the Early Modern world of learning and science (pp. 31–80). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004507159_003.

9. Gilmont, J.-F., & Vanautgaerden, A. (2008). La page de titre à la Renaissance. Brepols. (In French).

10. King, J. N. (2004). Bale, John. In H. C. G. Matthew, & B. Harrison (Eds.). Oxford dictionary of national biography (Vol. 3, pp. 482–486). Oxford Univ. Press.

11. Leu, U. B. (2016). Conrad Gessner (1516–1565): Universalgelehrter und Naturforscher der Renaissance. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. (In German).

12. Lewis, M. S. (2008). Introduction. The dedication as paratext. In I. Bossuyt et al. (Eds.). “Cui dono lepidum novum libellum?”: Dedicating Latin works and motets in the sixteenth century (pp. 1–11). Leuven Univ. Press.

13. Maillard, J.-F., Monok, I., & Nebbiai, D. (Publ.) (2009). Matthias Corvin, les bibliothèques princières et la genèse de l’état moderne. Országos Széchényi Könyvtár. (In French).

14. Nenarokova, M. R. (2022). Blazhennyi Ieronim Stridonskii i traditsiia traktatov “O znamenitykh muzhakh” [St. Jerome and the Tradition of “De viris illustribus” treatises]. In M. R. Nenarokova (Ed.). “Istoriia literatury”: nenauchnye istoki odnogo nauchnogo zhanra (pp. 38–61). IMLI RAN. (In Russian).

15. Prolygina, I. V. (2017). Galen. O sobstvennykh knigakh [Galen. On my own books]. ΣΧΟΛΗ. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaia traditsiia, 11(2), 636–677. https://doi.org/10.21267/AQUILO.2017.11.6485. (In Russian).

16. Reske, Ch. (2015). Die Buchdrucker des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts im deutschen Sprachgebiet: Auf der Grundlage des gleichnamigen Werkes von Josef Benzing (2nd ed.). Harrassowitz. (In German).

17. Sabba, F. (2012). La “Bibliotheca universalis” di Conrad Gesner: Monumento della cultura europea. Bulzoni. (In Italian)

18. Sergeev, M. L. (2014). Grechesko-latinskii slovar’ 1537 goda: svidetel’stva sostavitelia i izdatelia [Greek-Latin dictionary of 1537: Editor’s and printer’s testimonies]. Vox medii aevi, 2014(1, no. 11), 40–46. (In Russian).

19. Sergeev, M. L. (2018). Grechesko-latinskie leksikony XVI v. v otsenkakh leksikografov togo vremeni [The 16th-century Greek-Latin Lexica reviewed by contemporary lexicographers]. Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia, 22(2), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp230690152288. (In Russian).

20. Simon, K. R. (2010). Istoriia inostrannoi bibliografii [History of foreign bibliography]. Izdatel’stvo Vsesoiuznoi knizhnoi palaty. (In Russian).

21. Steffen, Ch. (1970). Untersuchungen zum “Liber de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis” des Johannes Trithemius. Ein Beitrag zu den Anfängen der theologischen Bibliographie. Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, 10, 1247–1354. (In German).


Review

For citations:


Sergeev M.L. Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about? Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(4):117-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-117-134

Views: 63


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-9410 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1765 (Online)