The aestheti cs of evoluti on: Darwin versus Venus de’ Medici
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-93-117
Abstract
The article addresses the aesthetic views of Charles Darwin, which are considered within the framework of wider Victorian discussions on the nature of beauty as well as influential earlier thought on the topic. Particular emphasis is placed on 1860s–1880s fashion satire, since these visual and textual sources can yield useful insights into the cross-pollination between scientific knowledge and the popular culture of the era. The juxtaposition of a statue of Venus and a fashionable lady of the day, ubiquitous in mid-Victorian journalism and caricature, lurks across the pages of several of Darwin’s works, where it takes on a completely different meaning. While fashion satire presented Venus as a timeless ideal, which at the same time was seen as an epitome of «natural» beauty, Darwin questioned the very possibility of such an ideal. Rather than concentrated in a fixed set of bodily forms and proportions, he saw beauty in nature and in human societies as perpetually fluid and infinitely variable, as if following the logic of fashion, which many of his contemporaries blamed for corrupting classical aesthetics. Indeed, in The Descent of Man Darwin directly attacks Venus de’ Medici, pointing to the limitations of this image of perfection and proposing a radical non-human aesthetics instead.
About the Author
K. O. GusarovaRussian Federation
Ksenia O. Gusarova – Cand. Sci. (Cultural Studies) Senior Researcher; Associate Professor, Department of Cultural
Studies and Social Communication
125993, GSP-3, Moscow, Miusskaya Sq., 6;
119571, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82
Tel.: +7 (499) 250-66-68;
Tel.: +7 (499) 956-99-99
References
1. Gusarova, K. (2021). Kryl’ia, nogi i khvosty: zoomorfnye modnitsy v zhurnale “Panch” [Wings, legs and tails: Zoomorphic fashion lovers in Punch magazine]. Teoriia mody: Odezhda. Telo. Kul’tura, 60, 273–311. (In Russian).
2. Hollander, A. (2016). Fabric of vision: Dress and drapery in painting. Bloomsbury.
3. Iampol’skii, M. (2019). Izobrazhenie: Kurs lektsii [The image: A series of lectures]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
4. Krasner, J. (2009). “One of a long row only”: Sexual selection and the male gaze in Thomas Hardy’s “Tess of the D’Urbervilles”. In F. Brauer, & B. Larson (Eds.). Art of evolution: Darwin, Darwinisms, and visual culture (pp. 155–172). Dartmouth College Press.
5. Krauss, R. (1986). The originality of the Avant-Garde. In R. Krauss. The originality of the Avant-Garde and other modernist myths (pp. 151–170). The MIT Press.
6. Mayr, E. (2000). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard Univ. Press.
7. Moruzi, K. (2009). Fast and fashionable: The girls in “The Girl of the Period Miscellany”. Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies, 14(1), 9–28.
8. Richards, E. (2017). Darwin and the making of sexual selection. Univ. of Chicago Press.
Review
For citations:
Gusarova K.O. The aestheti cs of evoluti on: Darwin versus Venus de’ Medici. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(1):93-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-93-117