Image of Hercules by Dracontius: On political interpretation of mythological poems (Romulea 2 & 4)
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-217-224
Abstract
This paper deals with the problem of political interpretation of the works of Dracontius, a Roman poet of the late 5th century from Carthage. The thesis about the socio-political background of his poems has become increasingly widespread in recent years. The grounds for this are provided by numerous references in his works to contemporary events: the formation of the Vandal kingdom in North Africa, formerly Roman, and the parallel conflict between the old and the new elites. Nevertheless, the author’s view of this conflict and his assessment of its sides remain a matter of debate. The key to solving it largely lies in a proper understanding of the author’s sympathies and antipathies towards his own characters, borrowed from traditional ancient mythological plots, whose behaviour appears to be a projection onto contemporary events. One such character is Hercules. He appears in two poems at once, Romulea 2 and 4. His image in them breaks many stereotypical ideas about the brutal and tragic nature of this hero; the present article is an attempt to provide an explanation for this. I aim to prove that Hercules is represented as an ambivalent model: on the one hand, he is the embodiment of the Roman side in the Roman-Vandal confrontation for a Roman audience, and on the other hand, he is the model of correct behaviour in conflict in principle. In the latter sense the didactic pathos associated with him could also be addressed to Vandals.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared within the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: 075-15-2022-326)
About the Author
I. M. Nikolsky
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan M. Nikolsky, Cand. Sci. (History), Assistant Professor
Institute of Social Sciences; Department of World History
119571; Prospekt Vernadskogo, 82; Moscow
References
1. Bouquet, J., & Wolff, E. (1995). Dracontius. Œeuvres, Vol. 3: La Tragédie d’Oreste. Poèmes Profanes I–V. Les Belles Lettres.
2. Bright, D. F. (1987). The miniature epic in Vandal Africa. Univ. of Oklahoma Press.
3. Bright, D. F. (1999). The chronology of the poems of Dracontius. Classica et Mediaevalia, 50, 193–206.
4. De Gaetano, M. (2009). Scuola e potere in Draconzio. Edizioni dell’Orso.
5. Díaz de Bustamante, J. M. (1978). Draconcio y sus Carmina profana: Estudio biográfico, introducción y edición critíca. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
6. Diederich, S. (2019). Dracontius auf Konfrontationskurs: Widerständige Positionen in De laudibus Dei. Dichtung zwischen Römern und Vandalen. In K. Pohl (Ed.). Tradition, Transformation und Innovation in den Werken des Dracontius (pp. 261–272). Franz Steiner Verlag.
7. Hays, G. (2004). ‘Romuleis Libicisque Litteris’: Fulgentius and the ‘Vandal Renaissance’. In A. Merrills (Ed.). Vandals, Romans and Berbers: New perspectives on Late Antique North Africa (pp. 101–132). Ashgate.
8. Hekster, O. (2001). Commodus-Hercules, the people’s princeps. Scripta Classica Israelica, 20, 51–83.
9. Hen, Y. (2007). Roman Barbarians: The royal court and culture in the Early Medieval West. Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Michel d’Annoville, C., & Stoehr-Monjou, A. (2008). Fidélité à la tradition et détournements dans la controverse de Dracontius (Romulea 5): un poème à double sens. In M. Sartre, & C. Sotinel (Eds.). L’usage du passé entre Antiquité tardive et Haut Moyen Âge. Hommage à Brigitte Beaujard (pp. 29–45). Presses universitaires de Rennes.
11. Nikolsky, I. M. (2019a). Politicheskii diskurs v “Pokhishchenii Eleny” Drakontsiia: istoricheskie zametki [Political discourse in Dracontius’ De Raptu Helenae]. Dialog so vremenem, 67, 273–282. (In Russian).
12. Nikolsky, I. M. (2019b). Politicheskii smysl “Medei” Drakontsiia [Political meaning of Dracontius’ Medea]. Vestnik drevnei istorii, 79(2), 327–334. doi: 10.31857/S032103910005037-3. (In Russian).
13. Nikolsky, I. M. (2020). Images of animals from Historia Naturalis in political rhetoric of Late Antiquity: Blossius Aemilius Dracontius’ lion. Shagi/ Steps, 6(1), 158–167. doi: 10.22394/2412-9410-2020-6-1-158-167.
14. Nikolsky, I. M. (2021). Khristianskii apologet ili rimskii patriot? Drakontsii i exempla virorum v ego “Khvale Gospodu’ (LD III.250–467) [Christian Apologist or Roman Patriot? Dracontius and the Exempla Virorum in his ‘De Laudibus Dei’ (LD III.250–467). Vestnik drevnei istorii, 81(3), 649–658. doi: 10.31857/S032103910011314-8. (In Russian).
15. Romano, D. (1959). Studi Draconziani. U. Manfredi.
16. Stoehr-Monjou, A. (2016). Die Götter in der Ethopoiie des Dracontius (Romul. 4). Ein Versuch doppelbödiger Rede in der „Sprache des Romulus“? In Colloque international sur Dracontius: “Reddere urbi litteras”: Wandel und Bewahrung in den Dichtungen des Dracontius (Nov 2016, Wuppertal, Germany). https://hal.science/hal-01900073.
17. Wasyl, A. M. (2011). Genres rediscovered: Studies in Latin Miniature epic, love elegy, and epigram of the Romano-Barbaric age. Jagiellonian Univ. Press.
18. Weber, B. (1995). Der Hylas des Dracontius: Romulea 2. Teubner.
19. Yarkho, V. N. (Intro., Trans., Comment.) (2001). Emilii Blossii Dracontsii. Mifologicheskie poemy [Aemilius Blossius Dracontius. Mythological poems]. Labirint. (In Russian).
20. Zwierlein, O. (2017). Die ‘Carmina profana’ des Dracontius: Prolegomena und kritischer Kommentar zur Editio Teubneriana. Mit einem Anhang: Dracontius und die ‘Aegritudo Perdicae’. De Gruyter.
21. Zwierlein, O. (2019). Die ‘Carmina christiana’ des Dracontius: Kritischer Kommentar. De Gruyter.
Review
For citations:
Nikolsky I.M. Image of Hercules by Dracontius: On political interpretation of mythological poems (Romulea 2 & 4). Shagi / Steps. 2024;10(2):217-224. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-217-224
Views:
95
Email this article 