“Le traictié d’une vision faite contre Le Ronmant de la Rose” of Jean Gerson: Debates in a dream and in reality
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-12-23
Abstract
The article analyzes the treatise of Jean Gerson, the outstanding French theologian of the 15thcentury and Chancellor of the University of Paris, “Le traictié d’une vision faite contre Le Ronmant de la Rose”, written on May 18, 1402. This work was created in the midst of the so-called dispute about the Roman de la Rose, in which prominent intellectuals of the early 15thcentury, the first French humanists — Christine de Pizan, Jean de Montreuil, the brothers Gontier and Pierre Col — took part. The treatise is an account of a vision in which Jean Gerson was allegedly present at the trial brought against Jean de Meng, the author of the second part of the Roman de la Rose, which is strikingly misogynistic. The article analyzes in detail the literary techniques used in this work, the genre of the treatise, and also raises the question of why Gerson needed to transfer the real literary debates that were going on between supporters and opponents of the Roman de la Rose into a fictional reality and give them the character of judicial debates. The author concludes that Jean Gerson’s treatise may have been based on the idea of dreams as Divine revelations, as omens of future — and quite real — events. Thus, the verdict regarding the Roman de la Rose and its author, Jean de Meng, was to be pronounced not in a dream, but in reality, and not by a fictional character, but by the chancellor of the University of Paris himself.
About the Author
O. I. Togoeva
Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga I. Togoeva, Dr. Sci. (History), Chief Research Fellow
119334, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 32a
Tel.: +7(495) 954-42-96
References
1. Accarie, M. (2004). Théâtre, littérature et société au Moyen Age. Serre. (In French).
2. Badel, P.-Y. (1980). Le Roman de la Rose au XIVe siècle. Etude de la réception de l’œuvre. Droz. (In French).
3. Blumenfeld-Kosinski, R. (2006). Jean Gerson and the Debate on the Romance of the Rose. In B. P. McGuire (Ed.). A companion to Jean Gerson (pp. 317–356). Brill.
4. Burgwinkle, W. E. (2004). Sodomy, masculinity, and law in medieval literature. France and England, 1050–1230. Cambridge Univ. Press.
5. Delaruelle, E., Labande, E.-R., & Ourliac, P. (1962). L’Eglise au temps du Grand Schisme et de la crise conciliaire (1378–1449). Bloud & Gay. (In French).
6. Gribanov, A. B. (1989). Zametki o zhanre videnii na Zapade i na Vostoke [Notes on the genre of visions in the West and in the East]. In Vostok — Zapad. Issledovaniia. Perevody. Publikatsii (Vol. 4, pp. 65–77). Glavnaia redaktsitia vostochnoi literatury izdatel’stva “Nauka”. (In Russian).
7. Hicks, E., & Ornato, E. (1977). Jean de Montreuil et le débat sur le Roman de la Rose. Romania, 98, 34–64, 186–219. (In French).
8. Huot, S. (1993). The Romance of the Rose and its medieval readers: Interpretation, reception, manuscript transmission. Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. Iarkho, B. I. (1989). Iz knigi “Srednevekovye latinskie videniia” [From the book “Medieval Latin Visions”]. In Vostok — Zapad. Issledovaniia. Perevody. Publikatsii (Vol. 4, pp. 18–55). Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury izdatel’stva “Nauka”. (In Russian).
10. Kabir, A. J. (2001). Paradise, death and Doomsday in Anglo-Saxon literature. Cambridge Univ. Press.
11. Kharman, D. D. (2020). Chistilishche sviatogo Patrika — i drugie irlandskie legendy [St. Patrick’s Purgatory — and other legends of medieval Ireland]. AST. (In Russian).
12. Lachaud, F. (2014). Filiation and context: The medieval afterlife of the Policraticus. In Ch. Grellard, & F. Lachaud (Eds.). A companion to John of Salisbury (pp. 377–438). Brill.
13. Langlois, E. (1918–1919). Le traité de Gerson contre le Roman de la Rose. Romania, 45, 23–48. (In French).
14. Lefèvre, S. (1992). Roman de la Rose. In G. Hasenohr, & M. Zink (Eds.). Dictionnaire des lettres françaises. Le Moyen Age (pp. 1308–1310). La Pochothèque. (In French).
15. Mcgrady, D. (2011). De “l’onneur et louenge des femmes”: les dédicaces épistolaires du Débat sur le Roman de la Rose et la réinvention d’un débat littéraire en éloge de femmes. Etudes françaises, 47(3), 11–27. (In French).
16. Quilligan, Mt. (1981). Allegory, allegoresis, and the deallegorization of language: The Roman de la Rose, the De planctu Naturae, and the Parlement of Foules. In M. Bloomfield (Ed.). Allegory, myth, and symbol (pp. 163–186). Harvard Univ. Press.
17. Schibanoff, S. (2001). Sodomy’s mark: Alan of Lille, Jean de Meun, and the medieval theory of authorship. In G. Burger, & S. F. Kruger (Eds.). Queering the Middle Ages (pp. 28–56). Univ. of Minnesota Press.
18. Swinford, D. (2012). Dream interpretation and the organic metaphor of the State in John of Salisbury’s Policraticus. Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures, 38(1), 32–59.
19. Togoeva, O. I. (2016). Eretichka, stavshaia sviatoi. Dve zhizni Zhanny d’Ark [Heretic turned Saint. Two lives of Joan of Arc]. Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. (In Russian).
20. Togoeva, O. I. (2017). “Preniia, preispolnennye liubeznosti”. Kristina Pizanskaia i ee opponenty-muzhchiny v spore o “Romane o Rose” [“A debate full of pleasantries”. Christine de Pizan and her male opponents in the dispute over the “Romance of the Rose”]. Adam i Eva: Al’manakh gendernoi istorii, 25, 50–71. (In Russian).
21. Togoeva, O. I. (2018). Dela ploti. Intimnaia zhizn’ liudei Srednevekov’ia v prostranste sudebnoi polemiki [Works of the flesh. Intimate life and judicial polemics in the Middle Ages]. Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. (In Russian).
22. Togoeva, O. I. (2022a). “Istinnaia pravda”: Iazyki srednevekovogo pravosudiia [“Veritable Truth”: The languages of medieval justice]. AST. (In Russian).
23. Togoeva, O. I. (2022b). To, chto umerlo, umeret’ ne mozhet? Samoubiitsy i pokhoronennye zazhivo v ugolovnykh sudakh Frantsii [What is dead cannot die? Suicides and those buried alive in the criminal courts of medieval France]. In Odissei: Chelovek v istorii — 2022 (pp. 217–229). (In Russian).
24. Valentini, A. (2016). Introduction. In A. Valentini (Ed.). Le Livre des epistres du debat sus le Rommant de la Rose (pp. 7–138). Classiques Garnier. (In French).
Review
For citations:
Togoeva O.I. “Le traictié d’une vision faite contre Le Ronmant de la Rose” of Jean Gerson: Debates in a dream and in reality. Shagi / Steps. 2023;9(4):12-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-12-23
Views:
57
Email this article 