Pers. 3.39–43 and the Phalaris legend
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-197-203
Abstract
Discussing how the reproaches of a guilty conscience haunt a man who has not lost the understanding of true virtue despite having fallen from its path, Persius (3.39–43) alludes to two well-known examples associated with Phalaris and Dionysius/Damocles: if Jupiter wanted to punish cruel tyrants with mental anguish, the sufferings of (a) one who is roasted in a copper bull, or (b) one over whose head a sword hangs, would seem trifling to them. The traditional explanation of these lines suggests several strong logical ‘leaps’, rightly recognized (but justified with some difficulty) by N. Rudd and R. A. Harvey. The remorse of tyrants is compared to the physical suffering of their victims, not their own; at the same time, for the sake of the balance between the two exempla, the story of Damocles is forcibly interpreted as an elaborate torture inflicted on him by Dionysius, moving away from the interpretation that Cicero and Horace give to the episode with the sword (Dionysius demonstrates to his subject what life is like for a despot who constantly fears an assassination attempt). Meanwhile, it seems possible to restore coherence to Persius’ thought by suggesting that v. 39 refers to a version of the Phalaris legend according to which the rebellious citizens of Agrigentum burned the tyrant in the same copper bull in which he burned others (cf. first of all Ovid Ibis 439–440, a passage close to Persius also lexically). In this interpretation, the punishment for tyrants’ crimes is either talionic revenge (Phalaris) or the constant fear of retribution which poisons their life (for it is Dionysius, not Damocles, who is the protagonist of vv. 40–41); but the virtual torment of remorse can be more painful than both.
About the Author
V. V. Zeltchenko
Mesrop Mashtots Institute of Ancient Manuscripts (Matenadaran)
Armenia
Armenia
Vsevolod V. Zeltchenko, Cand. Sci. (Philology), Senior Research Fellow
Department for The Study of Translated Literature
0009; Mashtots Ave., 53; Yerevan
References
1. Barr, W. (Intro., Comment.) (1987). The Satires of Persius (G. Lee, Trans.). Francis Cairns.
2. Bentley, R. (1699). A Dissertation upon the Epistles of Phalaris. With an answer to the objections of honourable Ch. Boyle, Esq. Printed by J. H.
3. Bianchetti, S. (1987). Falaride e Pseudofalaride: Storia e leggenda. L’Erma di Bretschneider.
4. Boeft, J. den, Drijwers, J. W., Hengst, D. den, & Teitler, H. C. (2013). Philological and historical commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXIX. Brill.
5. Boyle, Ch. (1699). Dr Bentley’s Dissertations on the Epistles of Phalaris, and the fables of Aesop (3<sup>rd</sup> ed.). Printed for Tho. Bennet.
6. Casaubon, I. (Ed., Comment.) (1839). Auli Persii Flacci Satirarum liber … (new ed., M. Casaubon, & F. Duebner, Eds.). E libraria Lehnholdiana.
7. Conington, J. (Trans., Comment.) (1893). The Satires of A. Persius Flaccus (H. Nettleship, Ed.) (3<sup>rd</sup> ed., rev.). Clarendon Press.
8. Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (2008). La spada di Damocle: Cicerone e il banchetto col tiranno (Tusc. 5, 61–62). In L. Castagna, & C. Riboldi (Eds.). Amicitiae templa serena: Studi in onore di G. Aricò (Vol. 2, pp. 1327–1349). Vita e Pensiero.
9. Del Amo Lozano, M. (2011). Aelii Antonii Nebrissensis grammatici in A. Persium Flaccum, poetam satyricum, interpretatio: Edición y estudio. Peter Lang.
10. Ebert, I. F. (1830). ΣΙΚΕΛΙΩΝ, sive Commentariorum de Siciliae veteris geographia, historia, mythologia, lingua, antiquitatibus sylloge (Vol. 1, Pt. 1). Sumtu fratrum Bortnaeger.
11. Gatti, P. L. (2014). Ovid in Antike und Mittelalter: Geschichte der philologischen Rezeption. Franz Steiner Verlag.
12. Gildersleeve, B. L. (Ed., Comment.) (1875). The Satires of A. Persius Flaccus. Harper & Brothers.
13. Harder, A. (Intro., Ed., Trans., Comment.) (2012). Callimachus. Aetia, Vol. 2: Commentary. Oxford Univ. Press.
14. Harvey, R. A. (1981). A commentary on Persius. Brill.
15. Hinz, V. (2001). Nunc Phalaris doctum protulit ecce caput: Antike Phalarislegende und Nachleben der Phala ris briefe. K. G. Saur.
16. Kenney, E. J. (2012). Satiric textures: Style, meter, and rhetoric. In S. Braund, & J. Osgood (Eds.). A companion to Persius and Juvenal (pp. 113–136). Wiley-Blackwell.
17. Kissel, W. (Ed., Trans., Comment.) (1990). Aules Persius Flaccus. Satiren. Karl Winter Universitätsverlag.
18. Knaack, G. (1887). Callimachea. Herrcke & Lebeling.
19. La Penna, A. (Proleg., Ed., Comment.) (1957). P. Ovidi Nasonis Ibis. La Nuova Italia.
20. Massimilla, G. (Intro., Ed., Trans., Comment.) (1996). Callimaco. Aitia: Libri primo e secondo. Giardini.
21. Polito, M. (2001). Dagli scritti di Eraclide sulle Costituzioni: Un commento storico. Arte Tipografica S. A. S.
22. Rudd, N. (1977). Lines of enquiry: Studies in Latin poetry. Cambridge Univ. Press.
23. Scivoletto, N. (Ed., Comment.) (1956). A. Persi Flacci Saturae: Testo critico e commento. La Nuova Italia.
24. Squillante, M. (2007–2008). La felicità e il potere: L’exemplum di Damocle nella rielaborazione tardoantica. Incontri triestini di filologia classica, 7, 249–260.
25. Wageningen, J. van. (1905). De Damoclis gladio. Mnemosyne, 33, 317–329.
26. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. (1921). Geschichte der Philologie. Teubner.
27. Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018). Critics, compilers, and commentators: An introduction to Roman philology, 200 BCE — 800 CE. Oxford Univ. Press.
Review
For citations:
Zeltchenko V.V. Pers. 3.39–43 and the Phalaris legend. Shagi / Steps. 2024;10(2):197-203. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-197-203
Views:
90
Email this article 