Teaching and preaching in the Derveni Papyrus: observations on mantike techne in Archaic and Classical Greece
https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-140-153
Abstract
According to a number of ancient authors, including the recently discovered treatise by Galen, “On my own opinions,” Prota goras suggested doubting everything that concerns the gods and their essence. Remarkably, Philostratus (Lives of the Sophists 1.10.2) sees the source of this doubt in Protagoras’ “Persian education” because, in his opinion, the Persian magi, while continuing to call on the gods in their secret rituals, would not admit it publicly, fearing that otherwise people, having realized that their supernatural abilities were linked to divine influences, would stop turning to them. In other words, in this way of reasoning, the magi were anxious not to lose their jobs. Should we accept the historicity of this strange message of Philostratus, or should we consider it a typical reflection of the Hellenistic and Roman historiographic stance to see an “eastern trace” in every doctrine or art? A famous statement from the Derveni papyrus (col. XX), which is fundamental to understanding its authorship, may help us answer this question. We will see the reasons why it is impossible to unequivocally answer the question of whether the author of the papyrus was a practicing telestes. However, it becomes clear that he contrasts himself not with the practitioners of the mysteries (including professional mantis), but with those who participate in them without understanding the meaning of what is going on and “without even asking questions.” On the contrary, he intends to provide answers to possible questions and to reveal the true meaning of the authoritative text by exegetical means. We shall also try to answer the question regarding the purpose for which the author of the papyrus sought to utilize various cosmological associations. Whether we are faced with an ancient philologically oriented “commentator,” or whether, by associating Zeus with air, Moira with pneuma, and Demeter and other female deities with the earth, he seeks to uncover the secret intentionally concealed in the poem and understandable only to the initiated?
About the Author
E. V. AfonasinRussian Federation
Evgeny V. Afonasin, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Professor
Higher School of Philosophy, History and Social Sciences
236041; Alexander Nevsky Str., 14; Kaliningrad
References
1. Bernabé, A. (2006). Magoi en el Papiro de Derveni: ¿magos persas, charlatanes u oficiantes órficos? In E. Calderón, A. Morales, & M. Valverde (Eds.). Koinòs logos: Homenaje al profesor José García López (pp. 99–109). Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia.
2. Bernabé, A. (2007). The Derveni theogony: Many questions and some answers. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 103, 99–133.
3. Bernabé, A., & Piano, V. (forthcoming). The Derveni Papyrus text and commentary.
4. Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, theology, and interpretation. Cambridge Univ. Press.
5. Betegh, G. (2007). The Derveni papyrus and early Stoicism. Rhizai, 4(1), 133–151.
6. Bremmer, J. (2014). Initiations into the mysteries of the ancient world. De Gruyter.
7. Brisson, L. (2003). Sky, sex and sun: The meaning of αἰδοῖος/αἰδοῖον in the Derveni papyrus. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 144, 19-29.
8. Brisson, L. (2009). Zeus did not commit incest with his mother: An interpretation of column XXVI of the Derveni Papyrus. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 168, 27–39.
9. Burkert, W. (1992). The Orientalizing revolution: Near Eastern influence on Greek culture in the early archaic age. Harvard Univ. Press.
10. Burkert, W. (1999). Da Omero ai magi: La tradizione orientale nella cultura greca. Marsilio.
11. Burkert, W. (2003). Die Griechen und der Orient: Von Homer bis zu den Magiern. C. H. Beck.
12. Burkert, W. (2004). Babylon, Memphis, Persepolis: Eastern context of Greec culture. Harvard Univ. Press.
13. Casadesús, F. (2005). Orpheus and Orphism: new approaches (A paper given at the International Colloquium “Orfeo e el Orfismo: Nuevas perspectivas”, Palma de Mallorca, 2005, Feb. 3–5).
14. Edmonds III, R. G. (2008). Extra-ordinary people: Mystai and magoi, magicians and Orphics in the Derveni Papyrus. Classical Philology, 103(1), 16–39. doi: 10.1086/590092.
15. Edwards, M. (1991). Notes on the Derveni commentator. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 86, 203–211.
16. Janko, R. (2001). The Derveni Papyrus (Diagoras of Melos, Apopyrgizontes logoi?): A new translation. Classical Philology, 96(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1086/449521.
17. Jeffery, L. H. (1961) The local scripts of Archaic Greece. Clarendon Press.
18. Jourdan, F. (2003). La papyrus de Derveni. Les Belles Lettres.
19. Kovacs, D. (Ed.) (1994) Euripides. Cyclops. Alcestis. Medea. Harvard University Press.
20. Laks, A., & Most, G. (Eds.) (1997). Studies in the Derveni Papyrus. Clarendon Press.
21. Mansfeld, J., & Runia, D. (2020). Aetiana V: An edition of the reconstructed text of the Placita with a commentary and a collection of the related texts. Brill.
22. Most, G. W. (1997). The fire next time: Cosmology, allegoresis, and salvation in the Derveni Papyrus. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 117, 117–135.
23. Obbink, D. (2010). Early allegory. In R. Copeland, & P. T. Struck (Eds.). The Cambridge companion to allegory (pp. 15–25). Cambridge Univ. Press.
24. Rusiaeva, A. S. (1978). Orfizm i kul’t Dionisa v Ol’vii [Orphism and the cult of Dionysus in Olbia]. Vestnik drevnei istorii, 1978(1, no. 143), 87–104. (In Russian).
25. San Cristо`bal, A. (2019). Rites and officiants in col. XX of the Derveni Papyrus. In M. A. Santamaria (Ed.). The Derveni Papyrus: Unearthing ancient mysteries (pp. 129–142). Brill.
26. Shorey, P. (Trans.) (1969). Plato (In 2 Vols., Vols. 5 & 6). Harvard Univ. Press.
27. Themelis, P., & Touratsoglou, J. (1997). Oi taphoi tou Derbeniou. Ekdosē tou Tameiou Archaiologikōn Porōn kai Apallotriōseōn. (In Greek).
28. Tsantsanoglou, K. (1997). The first columns of the Derveni Papyrus and their religious significance. In A. Laks, & G. W. Most (Eds.). Studies on the Derveni Papyrus (pp. 93–128). Clarendon Press.
29. Turcan, R. (1986). Bacchoi ou bacchants? De la dissidence des vivants à la ségrégation des morts. In O. de Cazanove (Ed.). L’association dionysiaque dans les sociétés anciennes (pp. 227–246). École Française de Rome.
30. West, M. (1983). The Orphic poems. Clarendon Press.
31. West, M. L. (1997). Hocus-pocus in East and West: Theogony, ritual, and the tradition of esoteric commentary. In A. Laks, & G. W. Most (Eds.). Studies on the Derveni Papyrus (pp. 81–90). Clarendon Press.
Review
For citations:
Afonasin E.V. Teaching and preaching in the Derveni Papyrus: observations on mantike techne in Archaic and Classical Greece. Shagi / Steps. 2024;10(2):140-153. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2024-10-2-140-153