Thematic repertoire of feuilletons about the New Poet and its diachronic transformations

The article discusses the thematic range of feuilletons featuring the New Poet published in the Sovremennik magazine between 1847 and 1862, as well as the changes in their thematics over time. An analysis of the content of these feuilletons shows that their authors, including Ivan Panaev, were well aware of the existing tradition of the feuilleton genre and at first adhered to its conventions. However, over time, they moved away from conventional, genre-specific approaches to selecting feuilleton topics and adapted the notes about the New Poet to current events. The feuilleton authors of Sovremennik sought to develop an idealized image of a writer who represented the project of a new literature during the last years of the reign of Nicholas I, as who was an active member of society during the Great Reforms era — a person familiar with contemporary public debates. In addition, Panaev and his co-authors rely on the gradual expansion of the thematic diversity in the feuilleton genre, trying to orient the reader in a larger context of events and perspectives. The main methods used in the article are structural topic modeling, which highlights broad subject-semantic fields, as well as assessment of information entropy that indicates the degree of diversity in the feuilleton themes.

1. Dianina, K. (2003). The feuilleton: An everyday guide to public culture in the age of the Great Reforms. The Slavic and East European Journal, 47(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219943.

2. Ipatova, S. A. (2020). Ob odnoi stikhotvornoi parodii Novogo Poeta (I. I. Panaeva) na Feta (1847) [Concerning a parody of Fet by the New Poet (I. I. Panaev) (1847)]. Russkaia literatura, 2020(4), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.31860/0131-6095-2020-4-21-31. (In Russian).

3. Jockers, M. L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. Univ. of Illinois Press.

4. Komarovich, V. L. (1930). Peterburgskie fel’etony Dostoevskogo [Petersburg feuilletons by Dostoevsky]. In Iu. G. Oksman (Ed.). Fel’etony sorokovykh godov. Zhurnal’naia i gazetnaia proza I. A. Goncharova, F. M. Dostoevskogo, I. S. Turgeneva (pp. 89–124). Academia. (In Russian).

5. Leibov, R., & Orekhov, B. V. (2022). Mezhdu politikoi i poetikoi: topika Kryma v sovremennoi russkoiazychnoi naivnoi lirike [Between politics and poetics: Topics of the Crimea in contemporary Russian-speaking naïve poems]. Shagi /Steps, 8(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-2-205-232. (In Russian).

6. Makeev, M. S. (2017). Nikolai Nekrasov [Nikolay Nekrasov]. Molodaia gvardiia. (In Russian).

7. Mel’gunov, B. V. (1986). Nekrasov, Panaev — Novyi poet (k istorii sozdaniia zhurnal’noi maski) [Nekrasov, Panaev — The New Poet (on the history of the creation of a magazine mask)]. Russkaia literatura, 1986(3), 153–169. (In Russian).

8. Mimno, D., & Wallach, H. M., & Talley, E., & Leenders, M., & McCallum, A. (2011). Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models. In EMNLP 2011: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Proceedings of the conference (pp. 262–272) (n. p.).

9. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). STM: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02.

10. Schöch, Ch. (2017). Topic modeling genre: An exploration of French classical and Enlightenment drama. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 11(2). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/2/000291/000291.html.

11. Shadrova, A. (2021). Topic models do not model topics: epistemological remarks and steps towards best practices. Journal of Data Mining and Digital Humanities, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.46298/jdmdh.7595.

12. Shashkova, E. V. (2007). Zhurnal’no-kriticheskaia deiatel’nost’ I. I. Panaeva [Journal-critical career of I. I. Panaev]. (Cand. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, Saint Petersburg State University). (In Russian).

13. Taddy, M. A. (2012). On estimation and selection for topic models. In N. D. Lawrence, & M. Girolami (Eds.). PMLR. Vol. 22: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 21–23 April 2012, La Palma, Canary Islands (pp. 1184–1193). PMLR.

14. Thorstensson, V. (2020). “All sorts” of fires: Suvorin’s roman-feuilleton Vsiakie and the Russian polemical novel of the 1860s. Russian Literature, 113, 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruslit.2020.04.005.

15. Tynianov, Iu. N., & Kazanskii, B. V. (Eds.) (1927). Voprosy sovremennoi poetiki. Fel’eton: Sbornik statei [Questions of modern poetics. Feuilleton: Collection of articles]. Academia. (In Russian).

16. Vdovin, A. V. (2011). Kontsept “glava literatury” v russkoi kritike 1830–1860-kh godov [The concept of “head of literature” in Russian criticism of the 1830s–1860s] (PhD Diss., Tartu Univ.). Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus. (In Russian).

17. Vdovin, A. V., & Zubkov, K. Iu. (2015). “Spor Peterburga s Moskvoiu”. Literaturnaia polemika pervoi poloviny 1850-kh godov [“The dispute between St. Petersburg and Moscow”. Literary polemics of the first half of the 1850s.]. In A. V. Vdovin, K. Iu. Zubkov, & A. S. Fedotov (Eds.). “Sovremennik” protiv “Moskvitianina”: Literaturno-kriticheskaia polemika pervoi poloviny 1850-kh godov (pp. 7–33). Nestor-Istoriia. (In Russian).

18. Vdovin, A. V., Zubkov, K. Iu., & Fedotov, A. S. (Eds.) (2015). “Sovremennik” protiv “Moskvitianina”. Literaturno-kriticheskaia polemika pervoi poloviny 1850-kh godov [“Sovremennik” versus “Moskvityanin”: Literary-critical polemics of the first half of the 1850s]. Nestor-Istoriia. (In Russian).

19. Wallach, H. M., Murray, I., Salakhutdinov, R., & Mimno, D. (2009). Evaluation methods for topic models. In L. Bottou, & M. Littman (Eds.). ICML 2009: Proceedings, TwentySixth Annual International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1105–1112) (n. p.). https://doi.org/10.1145/1553374.1553515.