“This spirit, when you feel it, it is always very cool…”: How cultural atmospheres work and why do we like them

The paper, based on field research into cultural practices and institutions in several Russian cities (2019–2021), is the first attempt to describe and conceptualize atmosphere as a special mode of cultural production and consumption. The authors argue that atmosphere is an important element of modern cultural industry and can provide a special kind of cultural pleasure. The phenomenon of “cultural atmospheres” is considered within the field of atmosphere studies that has become widespread in recent years in philosophy, the humanities and the social sciences. In this theoretical context the research focus is set using key properties of the atmosphere phenomenon such as material nature and supermaterial effects, homogeneity, affectivity, lack of distance between the object and the subject, etc. The authors analyze the reflections and representations of their informants’ cultural life experience and show that atmosphere appears in discursive constructions not only as a characteristic of a certain place or event, but also as an independent source of affects, impressions and pleasures expected from culture. The atmosphere mode of culture consumption, implying relevant attunements provided by the perceiving subject’s work of imagination and cultural experience, free him from the “cultural consumption” imperative understood as the acquisition of a readymade product. One of the authors’ hypotheses is that it is this quality that gives cultural atmosphere a special charm.

1. Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77–81.

2. Benjamin, W. (1972) Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. In W. Benjamin. Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. 1, Part 2, pp. 471–508). Suhrkamp. (In German).

3. Bille, M. (2015). Lighting up cosy atmospheres in Denmark. Emotion, Space and Society, 15(3), 56–63.

4. Bille, M., & Simonsen, K. (2021). Atmospheric practices: On affecting and being affected. Space and Culture, 24(2), 295–309.

5. Bonami, Z. (2019). Muzei v diskurse affekta [Museum in the discourse of affect]. In A. Zavadskii, V. Sklez, & K. Suverina (Eds.). Politika affekta: muzei kak prostranstvo publichnoi istorii (pp. 51–78). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

6. Böhme, G. (1993). Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 36(1), 113–126.

7. Bräunlein, P. J. (2022). Introduction [to Part 3]. In F. Yi-Neumann, A. Lauser, A. Fuhse, & P. J. Bräunlein (Eds.). Material culture and (forced) migration: Materializing the transient (pp. 159–170). UCL Press.

8. Daniels, I. (2015). Feeling at home in contemporary Japan: Space, atmosphere and intimacy. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 47–55.

9. Eisenlohr, P. (2018). Suggestions of movement: Voice and sonic atmospheres in Mauritian Muslim devotional practices. Cultural Anthropology, 33(1), 32–57. https://doi.org.10.14506/ca33.1.02.

10. Griffero, T. (2019). Is there such a thing as an “atmospheric turn”? Instead of an introduction. In T. Griffero, & M. Tedeschini (Eds). Atmosphere and aesthetics: A plural perspectives (pp. 11–62). Palgrave Macmillan.

11. Griffero, T., & Tedeschini, M. (2019). Introduction. In T. Griffero, & M. Tedeschini (Eds). Atmosphere and aesthetics: A plural perspectives (pp. 1–7). Palgrave Macmillan.

12. Griffero, T., & Tedeschini, M. (Eds.) (2019). Atmosphere and aesthetics: A plural perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.

13. Hubbard, P. (2005). The geographies of ‘going out’: Emotion and embodiment in the evening economy. In J. Davidson, L. Bondi, & M. Smith (Eds.). Emotional geographies (pp. 117– 134). Ashgate Publishing.

14. Kolehmainen, M., & Mäkinen, K. (2019). Affective labour of creating atmospheres. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(2), 448–463.

15. Likhachev, D. S. (1982). Poeziia sadov: K semantike sadovo-parkovykh stilei [Poetry of gardens: On the semantics of gardening styles]. Nauka. (In Russian).

16. Linnet, J. T. (2011). Money can’t buy me hygge: Danish middle-class consumption, egalitarianism and the sanctity of inner space. Social Analysis, 55(2), 21–44.

17. Low, S. M. (2014). Spatialities: The rebirth of urban anthropology through studies of urban space. In D. M. Nonini (Ed.). A companion to urban anthropology (pp. 15–27). WileyBlackwell.

18. McCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603.

19. Malbon, B. (1999). Clubbing: Dancing, ecstasy and vitality. Routledge.

20. Olesen, B. B. (2010). Ethnic objects in domestic interiors: Space, atmosphere and the making of home. Home Cultures, 7(1), 25–41.

21. Peterson, M. (2021). Atmosphere. In H. Callan (Ed.). The international encyclopedia of anthropology. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2477. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2477.

22. Pine, B., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Harvard Business Review Press.

23. Riedel, F. (2019). Atmosphere. In J. Slaby, & Ch. von Scheve (Eds.). Affective societies: Key concepts (pp. 85–95). Routledge.

24. Schmitz, H. (2019). Atmospheric spaces (M. Bastert, Trans.). In T. Griffero, & M. Tedeschini (Eds.). Atmosphere and aesthetics: A plural perspectives (pp. 63–76). Palgrave Macmillan.

25. Stewart, K. (2011). Atmospheric attunements. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(3), 445–453.

26. Tutenges, S., & Bøhling, F. (2019). Designing drunkenness: How pubs, bars and nightclubs increase alcohol sales. International Journal of Drug Policy, 70, 15–21.

27. Urry, J. (1990). The tourist gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. Sage Publications.

28. Vergunov, A. P., & Gorokhov, V. A. (1996). Vertograd: Sadovo-parkovoe iskusstvo Rossii (ot istokov do nachala XX veka) [Vertograd: Landscape art of Russia (from the origins to the beginning of the 20th century)]. Kul’tura. (In Russian).