<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">steps</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Шаги/Steps</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Shagi / Steps</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2412-9410</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-1765</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">steps-908</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>"Большая семья" против "малой": слухи о сыне Хрущева как прием и симптом</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The “big family” against the “little” one: rumors about Khrushchev's son as a device and a symptom</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кирзюк</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kirzyuk</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">kirzuk@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>240</fpage><lpage>250</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кирзюк А., 1970</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1970</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кирзюк А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kirzyuk A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/908">https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/908</self-uri><abstract><p>Рассматривается сюжет слухов о сыне Хрущева. История о том, что десталинизация стала результатом мести Хрущева за его сына, расстрелянного при Сталине, появилась в середине 1960-х годов, но до сих пор актуальна среди сталинистов. Этот сюжет анализируется в рамках концепции «мифа о большой семье» Катарины Кларк. Предлагается гипотеза, согласно которой устойчивость сюжета связана с оппозицией «большой» и «малой» семей, лежащей в основе представлений о правильном устройстве общества.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article considers the narrative that destalinization resulted from Khrushchev's revenge for his son, who was executed during Stalin's rule. This rumor appeared in the mid1960s and today remains current among Stalin's followers. This plot is analyzed within the framework of Katerina Clark's conception of the Stalin period “big family myth”, according to which the Soviet people as a whole was imagined like a “big family”. We put forward the hypothesis that the persistence of the plot involving Khrushchev's son is related to the opposition between the “big family” and a “little family”, an opposition that underpins the ideas about the proper organization of society.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Хрущев</kwd><kwd>сталин</kwd><kwd>слухи</kwd><kwd>"миф о большой семье"</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Khrushchev</kwd><kwd>Stalin</kwd><kwd>rumors</kwd><kwd>“big family myth”</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
