<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">steps</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Шаги/Steps</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Shagi / Steps</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2412-9410</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-1765</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-1-190-199</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">steps-61</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АРХАИЧЕСКОЕ И СОВРЕМЕННОЕ НА СЦЕНЕ И В КИНЕМАТОГРАФЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THE ARCHAIC AND THE CONTEMPORARY IN THEATRE AND CINEMA</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Стратегия деконструкции и поиск жизненных ориентиров в фильме «Обход» (1971)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Deconstruction strategy and the search for life values in the film “Walkabout” (1971)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0131-9526</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Торбург</surname><given-names>М. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Torburg</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Марина Робертовна Торбург кандидат философских наук доцент кафедры социальных наук и технологий</p><p>119991, Москва, Ленинский пр-т, д. 4</p><p>Тел: +7 (499) 237-65-80</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Marina (R) Torburg, Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences</p><p>119991, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 4</p><p>Tel.: +7 (499) 237-65-80</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">m.torburg@misis.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5563-1350</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Добронравов</surname><given-names>С. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Dobronravov</surname><given-names>S. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сергей Викторович Добронравов кандидат философских наук доцент, кафедра философии и общегуманитарных дисциплин</p><p>19049, Москва, Ленинский пр-т, д. 8</p><p>Тел.: +7 (499) 237-40-372</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sergey (V.) Dobronravov, Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Humanitarian Disciplines</p><p>19049, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 8 </p><p>Tel.: +7 (499) 237-40-372</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">philospost@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский технологический университет «МИСиС»<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru">Московский гуманитарно-экономический университет<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Moscow Humanitarian Economic University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>01</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>190</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Торбург М.Р., Добронравов С.В., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Торбург М.Р., Добронравов С.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Torburg M.R., Dobronravov S.V.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/61">https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/61</self-uri><abstract><p>Целью статьи является исследование своеобразия воплощения стратегии деконструкции в фильме «Обход» (1971), снятом британским режиссером и оператором Николасом Роугом. Создатели фильма следуют постмодернистским концепциям от­рицания тождества в качестве предметного и смыслового посто­янства, децентрации субъекта, отказа от логоцентризма, фоно­центризма, фаллоцентризма, подвергают критике рационализм как способ познания действительности. Через деконструкцию ри­туалов и ценностей, лежащих в основании социальных практик как представителей индустриальной цивилизации, так и перво­бытного общества, авторы фильма показывают тотальную несво­боду человека. Авторы статьи приходят к выводу, что создатели фильма, пользуясь преимуществами рационалистического под­хода и высокоразвитой техники, без которых невозможно созда­ние высококачественного кино, способствуют пониманию про­блем современной им культуры, а выходя за пределы стратегии деконструкции, настраивают зрителей на определенные жизнен­ные ориентиры, в основе которых синтез первобытной солидарно­сти и технических достижений цивилизации.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of this article is to study how the strategy of deconstruction is implemented in the film “Walkabout” (1971), created by British director and cameraman Nicholas Roeg. On the one hand, the film touches upon eternal philosophical questions, and with an arc — reflects the intellectual atmosphere of the time of its creation. “Walkabout” embodied the ideas of the French phi­losophers J. F. Lyotard and J. Derrida, with whom the form of post­modernism as a philosophical trend begins. The film presents phil­osophical ideas generated by modern capitalist society, such as the disintegration of identity, the decentralization of man in the world, disillusionment with scientific and technological progress and glo­balization of the world community, the collapse of traditional val­ues. The choice of location for filming reflects a trend characteris­tic of modern Western society — an increase in interest in exotic cultures and, especially, in their spiritual practices. The authors of the film use irony, hints, allegories and other favorite formalis­tic devices of postmodern thought. The film embodies postmodern ideas — the denial of identity as semantic and objective constancy, the decentering of the personality, as well as the delegitimization of the attitudes of classical culture based on the concepts of logo­centrism, phonocentrism, phallocentrism and criticism of Western rationalism. By deconstructing the rituals and values that underlie the social practices of representatives of modern and primitive cul­tures, the filmmakers reveal their difference, which is opposite to the rationalistic and mythological view of the world, and the similarity, which lies in the absolute absence of freedom in their lives. The ex­istence of representatives of these cultures is completely determined by factors external to their personalities. The authors of the article come to the conclusion that the filmmakers, using a rationalistic ap­proach and highly developed technology, without which it is impos­sible to create high-quality film, contribute to an understanding of the problems of modern culture. In addition, by going beyond the framework of postmodern thought, they tune the audience to certain life values, which are based on a synthesis of primitive solidarity and the technical achievements of modern civilization.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>стратегия деконструкции</kwd><kwd>плюрализм</kwd><kwd>релятивизм</kwd><kwd>жизненные ориентиры</kwd><kwd>экзотические культуры</kwd><kwd>синхроническое рассмотрение</kwd><kwd>делигитимация классической культуры</kwd><kwd>критика рационализма</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>deconstruction strategy</kwd><kwd>pluralism</kwd><kwd>relativism</kwd><kwd>life values</kwd><kwd>exotic cultures</kwd><kwd>synchronic consideration</kwd><kwd>delegitimization of classical culture</kwd><kwd>criticism of rationalism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Автономова 2000 — Автономова Н. Деррида и грамматология // Деррида Ж. О грамматологии / Пер. с фр. и вступ. ст. Н. Автономовой. М.: Ad Marginem, 2000. С. 7-107.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avtonomova, N. (2000). Derrida i grammatologiia [Derrida and Grammatology]. In Zh. Derrida [= J. Derrida]. O grammatologii (pp. 7-107). Ad Marginem. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вельш 1992 — Вельш В. «Постмодерн». Генеалогия и значение одного спорного понятия / Пер. с нем. // Путь. 1992. № 1. С. 109-136.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derrida, J. (1972). Positions. Paris: Ed. de Minuit. (In French).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Деррида 1992 — Деррида Ж. Письмо японскому другу / Пер. с фр. А. Гараджи // Вопросы философии. 1992. № 4. С. 53-57.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derrida, J. (1985). Lettre a un ami japonais. Le Promeneur, 42, 2-4. (In French).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Деррида 1996 — Деррида Ж. Позиции. Киев: Д. Л., 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Donald Gordon Payne 1924-2018 (2018). Westcott Village Magazine, 2018(October), 40-41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Джеймисон 2019 — Джеймисон Ф. Постмодернизм, или Культурная логика позднего капитализма / Пер. с англ. Д. Кралечкина; Под науч ред. А. Олейникова. М.: Изд-во Ин¬та Гайдара, 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elkin, A. (1938). The Australian aborigines: How to understand them. Angus &amp; Robertson.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лиотар 1998 — Лиотар Ж.-Ф. Состояние постмодерна / Пер. с фр. Н. А. Шматко. М.: Ин-т эксперим. социологии СПб.: Алетейя, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke Univ. Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малявин 1991 — Малявин В. В. Мифология и традиция постмодернизма // Логос: Ленинградские международные чтения по философии культуры. Кн. 1: Разум. Духовность. Традиции. Л.: Изд-во Ленинград. ун-та, 1991. С. 51-59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Ed. de Minuit. (In French).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Павлов 2018 — Павлов А. Социальная теория: постмодернистский поворот — модернистский разворот // Общественные науки и современность. 2018. № 5. С. 158-170.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maliavin, V. V. (1991). Mifologiia i traditsiia postmodernizma [Mythology and tradition of post¬modernism]. Logos: Leningradskie mezhdunarodnye chteniia po filosofii kul'tury, (Vol. 1) Razum. Dukhovnost'. Traditsii (pp. 51-59). Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Павлов 2019 — Павлов А. Странная жизнь постмодернизма // Джеймисон Ф. Постмодернизм, или Культурная логика позднего капитализма / Пер. с англ. Д. Кралечкина; Под науч. ред. А. Олейникова. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2019. С. 7-53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlov, A. (2018). Sotsial'naia teoriia: postmodernistskii povorot — modernistskii razvorot [So¬cial theory: Postmodern turn — modernist turn]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2018(5), 158-170. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Роуз 1989 — Роуз Ф. Аборигены Австралии. Традиционное общество / Пер. с англ. Е. В. Говор. М.: Прогресс, 1989.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlov, A. (2019). Strannaia zhizn' postmodernizma [The strange life of Postmodernism]. In F. Dzheimison [= Jameson]. Postmodernizm, ili Kul'turnaia logika pozdnego kapitalizma (pp. 7-53). Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gaidara. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Токарев 2005 — Токарев С. А. Религия в истории народов мира. 5-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Республика, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose, F. G. G. (1987). The traditional mode of production of the Australian aborigines. Angus &amp; Robertson.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Элькин 1952 — Элькин А. Коренное население Австралии / Сокр. пер. с англ. Л. Я. Бровика, В. П. Михайлова. М.: Изд-во иностр. лит., 1952.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tokarev, S. A. (2005). Religiia v istorii narodov mira [Religion in the history of the peoples of the world] (5th ed., enl. and ed.). Respublika. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Payne 2018 — Donald Gordon Payne 1924-2018 // Westcott Village Magazine. 2018. October. P. 40-41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Welsch, V. (1988). “Postmoderne” — Genealogie und Bedeutung eines umstrittenen Begriffs. In P. Kemper (Ed.). “Postmoderne”, oder, Kampf um die Zukunft. Die Kontroverse in Wissen- schaft, Kunst und Gesellschaft (pp. 9-36). Fischer Taschenbuch. (In German).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
