stepsШаги/StepsShagi / Steps2412-94102782-1765The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationZNGCCYsteps-308Research ArticleРЕЦЕНЗИИBOOK REVIEWSИсторическая аретология науки: Херман Пол о научных добродетелях и ценностных горизонтах историков от античности до наших днейHistorical aretology of science: Herman Paul on scholarly virtues and value horizons of historians from Antiquity to the present dayhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1327-568XПлешковА. А.PleshkovA. A.

Алексей Александрович Плешков, кандидат философских наук научный сотрудник, Центр философских исследований (PHI), постдокторант фонда «Солидарность»

1050, Brussels, Avenue Franklin Roosevelt, 50

Aleksei Aleksandrovich Pleshkov, Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) Research Fellow, Philosophy Research Center (PHI), Solidarity Fund Postdoctoral Fellow

1050, Brussels, Avenue Franklin Roosevelt, 50

sheginoid@gmail.comБрюссельский свободный университетБельгияFree University of Brussels (ULB)Belgium202518062025112347364Copyright © Плешков А.А., 20252025Плешков А.А.Pleshkov A.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/308

Рецензия на: Paul H. Historians’ virtues: From Antiquity to the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022. (Cambridge Elements: Historical Theory and Practice). 66 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993067.

A review of: Paul, H. (2022). Historians’ virtues: From Antiquity to the twenty-first century. Cambridge Univ. Press. 66 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993067.

ReferencesБедекер 2010 — Бедекер Х. Размышления о методе истории понятий // История понятий, история дискурса, история метафор / Под ред. Х. Бедекера; Пер. с нем. М.: Нов. лит. обозрение, 2010. С. 34–66.Armitage, D. (2012). What’s the big idea? Intellectual history and the longue durée. History of European Ideas, 38(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2012.714635.Дастон, Галисон, 2018 — Дастон Л. Галисон П. Объективность / Пер. с англ. Т. Вархотов и др. М.: Нов. лит. обозрение, 2018.Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.Дастон, 2015 — Дастон Л. Дисциплинирование дисциплин: академии и единство знания / [Пер. с англ. А. Плешкова] // Науки о человеке: история дисциплин / Сост. и. отв. ред. А. Н. Дмитриев, И. М. Савельева. М.: Изд. дом Высш. шк. экономики, 2015. С. 105–123.Bakker, E. J. (2002). Khrónos, Kléos, and ideology from Herodotus to Homer. In M. Reichel, & A. Rengakos (Eds.). EPEA PTEROENTA: Beiträge zur Homerforschung: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann zum 75. Geburtstag (pp. 11–30). Steiner.Касавин 2019 — Касавин И. Т. Эпистемология добродетелей: к сорокалетию поворота в аналитической философии // Эпистемология и философия науки. Т. 56. № 3. 2019. С. 6–19. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956341.Bödeker, H. (2002). Reflexionen über Begriffsgeschichte als Methode. In H. Bödeker (Ed.) Begriffsgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte, Metapherngeschichte (pp. 73–123). Wallstein Verlag.Лурье 1947 — Лурье С. Я. Геродот. М., Л.: Изд-во Акад. наук СССР, 1947.Cooper, J. M. (1998). The unity of virtue. Social Philosophy and Policy, 15(1), 233–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003149.Матвеев 2020 — Матвеев С. Р. «Ученый-большевик призван оценивать объективно»: рецензии в советской исторической периодике 1930–1950-х годов // Научное рецензирование в гуманитарных дисциплинах: Жанр, исследования, тексты / Сост. и отв. ред. Н. М. Долгорукова, А. А. Плешков. М.: Изд. дом Высш. шк. экономики, 2020. C. 113–124.Daston, L. (1999). Academies and the unity of the sciences: Disciplining the disciplines. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 67–86.Моретти, 2016 — Моретти Ф. Дальнее чтение / Пер. с англ. А. Вдовина и др. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2016.Daston, L., Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Zone Books.Савельева, Полетаев 1997 — Савельева И. М., Полетаев А. В. История и время: в поисках утраченного. М.: Языки рус. культуры, 1997.Daston, L., & Sibum, O. H. (2003). Scientific personae and their histories. Science in Context, 16(1–2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988970300067X.Скиннер 2018 — Скиннер К. Значение и понимание в истории идей / Пер. с англ. Т. Пирусской // Кембриджская школа: теория и практика интеллектуальной истории / Сост. Т. Атанашев, М. Велижев. Москва: Нов. лит. обозрение, 2018. С. 53–122.Eskildsen, K. R. (2021). Virtues of history: Exercises, seminars, and the emergence of the German historical discipline, 1830–1900. In K. Chang, & A. Rocke (Eds.). A global history of research education: Disciplines, institutions, and nations. 1840–1950 (pp. 27–40). Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844774.003.0003.Armitage 2012 — Armitage D. What’s the big idea? Intellectual history and the longue durée // History of European Ideas. Vol. 38. No. 4. 2012. P. 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2012.714635.Hershbell, J. P. (1993). Plutarch and Herodotus — The beetle in the rose. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 136(2), 143–163.Austin 1962 — Austin J. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.Kasavin, I. T. (2019). Epistemologiia dobrodetelei: k sorokaletiiu povorota v analiticheskoi filosofii [Virtue epistemology: on the 40th anniversary of the turn in analytical philosophy]. Epistemologiшa i filosofiшa nauki, 56(3), 6–19. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956341.Bakker 2002 — Bakker E. J. Khrónos, Kléos, and ideology from Herodotus to Homer // EPEA PTEROENTA: Beiträge zur Homerforschung: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann zum 75. Geburtstag / Hrsg. von M. Reichel, A. Rengakos. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2002. S. 11–30.Koselleck, R. (1989). Social history and conceptual history. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 2(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384827.Cooper, 1998 — Cooper J. M. The unity of virtue // Social Philosophy and Policy. Vol. 15. No. 1. 1998. P. 233–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003149.Lur’e, S. Ia. (1947). Gerodot [Herodotus]. Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. (In Russian).Daston, Sibum 2003 — Daston L., Sibum O. H. Scientific personae and their histories // Science in Context. Vol. 16. No. 1–2. 2003. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988970300067X.Matveev, S. R. (2020). “Uchenyi-bol’shevik prizvan otsenivat’ ob”ektivno”: retsenzii v sovetskoi istoricheskoi periodike 1930–1950-kh godov [“A Bolshevik scholar ought to make objective evaluations”: Reviews in Soviet historical periodicals in the 1930s–1950s]. In N. M. Dolgorukova, & A. A. Pleshkov (Eds.). Nauchnoe retsenzirovanie v gumanitarnykh distsiplinakh: Zhanr, issledovaniia, teksty (pp. 113–124). Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. (In Russian).Eskildsen 2021 — Eskildsen K. R. Virtues of history: exercises, seminars, and the emergence of the German historical discipline, 1830–1900 // A global history of research education: Disciplines, institutions, and nations. 1840–1950 / Ed. by K. Chang, A. Rocke. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2021. (History of Universities; Vol. 34; no. 1). P. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844774.003.0003.Meeus, A. (2020). Truth, method and the historian’s character: The epistemic virtues of Greek and Roman Historians. In A. Turner (Ed.). Reconciling ancient and modern philosophies of history (pp. 83–122). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110627305-005.Hershbell 1993 — Hershbell J. P. Plutarch and Herodotus — The beetle in the rose // Rheinisches Museum für Philologie. Bd. 136. Heft. 2. 1993. S. 143–163.Momigliano, A. (1966). Time in ancient historiography. History and Theory, 6(Beiheft 6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504249.Koselleck 1989 — Koselleck R. Social history and conceptual history // International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. Vol. 2. No. 3. 1989. P. 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384827.Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso.Meeus 2020 — Meeus A. Truth, method and the historian’s character: The epistemic virtues of Greek and Roman historians // Reconciling ancient and modern philosophies of history / Ed. by A. Turner. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2020. P. 83–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110627305-005.Ng, O.-Ch., & Wang, E. Q. (2005). Mirroring the past: The writing and use of history in imperial China. Univ. of Hawai’i Press.Momigliano 1966 — Momigliano A. Time in ancient historiography // History and Theory. Vol. 6. Beiheft 6. 1966. P. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504249.Nussbaum, M. (1993). Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. In M. Nussbaum, & A. Sen (Eds.). The quality of life (pp. 242–269). Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0020.Ng, Wang 2005 — Ng O.-Ch., Wang E. Q. Mirroring the past: The writing and use of history in imperial China. Honolulu: Univ. of Hawai’i Press, 2005.Paul, H. (2014). What is a scholarly persona? Ten theses on virtues, skills, and desires. History and Theory, 53(3), 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10717.Nussbaum 1993 — Nussbaum M. Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach // The quality of life / Ed. by M. Nussbaum, A. Sen. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. P. 242–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0020.Pleshkov, A., & Surman, J. (2021). Book reviews in the history of knowledge. Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 20, 629–650. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.21.018.14049.Paul 2014 — Paul H. What is a scholarly persona? Ten theses on virtues, skills, and desires // History and Theory. Vol. 53. No. 3. 2014. P. 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10717.Savel’eva, I. M., & Poletaev, A. V. Istoriia i vremia: v poiskakh utrachennogo [History and time: In search of the lost]. Iazyki russkoi kul’tury. (In Russian).Pleshkov, Surman 2021 — Pleshkov A., Surman J. Book reviews in the history of knowledge // Studia Historiae Scientiarum. Vol. 20. 2021. P. 629–650. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.21.018.14049.Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53.Ten Hagen 2022 — Ten Hagen S. Evaluating knowledge, evaluating character: Book reviewing by American historians and physicists (1900–1940) // History of Humanities. Vol. 7. No. 2. 2022. P. 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1086/721313.Ten Hagen, S. (2022). Evaluating knowledge, evaluating character: Book reviewing by American historians and physicists (1900–1940). History of Humanities, 7(2), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1086/721313.Todorov 1976 — Todorov Ts. The origin of genres // New Literary History. Vol. 8. No. 1. 1976. P. 159–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/468619.Todorov, Ts. (1976). The origin of genres. New Literary History, 8(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/468619.Verburgt 2023 — Verburgt L. M. Introduction to the symposium “What makes a philosopher (good or bad)? Philosophical virtues and vices: Past and present” // Metaphilosophy. Vol. 54. No. 2–3. 2023. P. 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12617.Verburgt, L. M. (2023). Introduction to the symposium “What makes a philosopher (good or bad)? Philosophical virtues and vices: Past and present”. Metaphilosophy, 54(2–3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12617.Zagzebski 2017 — Zagzebski L. T. Exemplarist moral theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2017.Zagzebski, L. T. (2017). Exemplarist moral theory. Oxford Univ. Press.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.